Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
280 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
117 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
191 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
83 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
108 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
47 FPS
6ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 29,879
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 13,745

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 63 83 108
1440p QHD 83 117 147 191
1080p Full HD 117 168 220 280

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 168
1920x1080 Low 280
1920x1080 Medium 220
1920x1080 Ultra 117
2560x1440 High 117
2560x1440 Low 191
2560x1440 Medium 147
2560x1440 Ultra 83
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Low 108
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 Ultra 47

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT delivers a wide spread of frame rates in Evolve, ranging from 46.8 FPS at 4K Ultra to 279.9 FPS at 1080p Low. The data reveals a system that is clearly overqualified for 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K presents a more nuanced challenge where preset selection becomes critical. This analysis examines the measured performance across three resolutions and four settings, interprets what the numbers mean for the CPU-GPU balance, and places this combo in the broader context of the benchmark database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptionally high frame rates across all presets. Low settings yield an average of 279.9 FPS, which is the highest figure recorded for this configuration. Medium settings drop to 220.3 FPS, while High settings come in at 168.3 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still maintains a strong 116.9 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a reduction of 163 FPS, or roughly 58% of the Low preset's performance, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom even when fully loaded.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance curve shifts downward but remains robust. Low settings produce 191.3 FPS, Medium delivers 147.3 FPS, and High achieves 117.2 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution average 83 FPS, which is a substantial drop from the 116.9 FPS seen at 1080p Ultra, representing a 29% decrease when moving up one resolution tier. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 108.3 FPS, showing that the preset choice has a significant impact on the experience at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the data tells a different story. Low settings still deliver a playable 107.6 FPS, and Medium maintains 82.9 FPS. High settings barely clear the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 62.9 FPS. Ultra settings, however, fall below playability with 46.8 FPS, marking the only measured configuration that fails to reach 60 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is dramatic: a 60.8 FPS drop, which is a 56.5% reduction from the Low preset's performance. The min and max FPS values are not provided in the data, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates to characterize the experience.

The progression across resolutions reveals consistent behavior. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 279.9 FPS at 1080p to 191.3 FPS at 1440p and further to 107.6 FPS at 4K. This represents a 61.5% reduction from 1080p to 4K. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 116.9 FPS to 83 FPS to 46.8 FPS across the same resolution ladder, a 60% reduction. The consistency of these drops suggests that the GPU is the primary scaling factor, with the CPU maintaining sufficient throughput to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at lower resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 116.9 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold, indicating that users have substantial headroom to enable all visual features without concern for frame rate degradation. The data shows no preset at this resolution falls below 60 FPS, so the best settings are simply the highest quality option available.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, with an average of 83 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by 23 FPS, providing a comfortable margin for demanding scenes. The High preset at this resolution delivers 117.2 FPS, but since Ultra remains above 60 FPS, it is the recommended choice for maximum visual fidelity. The gap between Ultra and High at 1440p is 34.2 FPS, which is a meaningful difference that users may consider if they prefer higher frame rates over maximum quality.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The best settings that maintain 60 FPS or above are High, with an average of 62.9 FPS. This barely clears the threshold, leaving only 2.9 FPS of headroom. Medium settings offer 82.9 FPS and Low settings offer 107.6 FPS, both of which are playable, but High represents the highest quality preset that remains playable. Ultra at 4K falls to 46.8 FPS, which is 13.2 FPS below the playable threshold, making it unsuitable for a smooth experience.

The verdict data confirms these findings. For 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best choice. For both 2560x1440 and 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra being the best settings at each resolution. This means users targeting 4K must compromise on preset selection, while those at lower resolutions can run the game at maximum quality.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the GPU is the dominant factor in Evolve's performance, particularly at higher resolutions. The consistent frame rate drops when moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K—regardless of preset—point to the RX 7900 XT being the limiting component. At 1080p Low, the system produces 279.9 FPS, which is far beyond what most displays can show, suggesting the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU rapidly. The Ryzen 7 5800XT, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 3 architecture, provides sufficient single-thread and multi-thread performance for this game.

The scaling between resolutions reveals that the CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high that the CPU must work harder to keep up with the GPU's output, but the data shows no signs of a CPU bottleneck—the system still achieves 279.9 FPS at Low settings. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear constraint, as evidenced by the 46.8 FPS at Ultra settings, which is a frame rate that would typically be limited by GPU compute rather than CPU throughput.

The preset scaling provides additional insight. At 1440p, going from Low to Ultra reduces the frame rate from 191.3 FPS to 83 FPS, a 56.6% drop. At 4K, the same preset change reduces performance from 107.6 FPS to 46.8 FPS, a 56.5% drop. The similarity of these percentages suggests that the preset settings have a consistent impact on GPU load, regardless of resolution. This is characteristic of a game where visual effects scale uniformly with resolution, placing the burden squarely on the GPU.

The CPU's benchmark scores support its role as a capable partner. The 3dmark single-thread score of 959 and the cinebench r23 single-core score of 3359 indicate strong per-core performance, which is important for games that rely on a few heavily threaded tasks. The passmark multithread score of 28053 and the cinebench r23 multicore score of 23794 show that the CPU can handle multi-threaded workloads as well. However, since Evolve is a 2015 FPS title, the data suggests that the GPU's raw rasterization power, demonstrated by the passmark g3d score of 29009, is the primary driver of frame rates.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU provide a context for how this processor compares to other options. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H has an average benchmark score of 29868, which is essentially identical to the Ryzen 7 5800XT's 29879, with a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29955, which is 0.3% higher than the 5800XT. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29713, which is 0.6% lower. These deltas are minimal, meaning users with any of these CPUs would see nearly identical performance in Evolve, assuming the same GPU is used.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show a wider variance in average scores. The AMD Radeon 660M scores 13812, which is 0.5% lower than the RX 7900 XT's 13745. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13821, also 0.5% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13871, which is 0.9% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543, which is 1.5% higher than the 7900 XT. These deltas are all within 2%, suggesting that these GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Evolve, though the RX 9070 XT might offer a slight edge.

It is important to note that the GPU's nearest rivals include some unusual entries, such as the Radeon 660M, which is an integrated GPU, and the RTX A2000 Mobile, which is a laptop part. This is a reflection of the benchmark database's scoring methodology, which groups GPUs by their average benchmark scores rather than their market positioning. The practical takeaway is that the RX 7900 XT's performance in Evolve is closely matched by these alternatives, and users upgrading from any of them would see a negligible difference.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 3840x2160?

A: High settings, which achieves an average of 62.9 FPS. Medium and Low are also playable, but Ultra falls to 46.8 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Can this combo run Evolve at 2560x1440 on Ultra?

A: Yes, Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 83 FPS, which is 23 FPS above the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29879, while the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868, a delta of 0%, meaning they perform nearly identically.

Q: Which GPU rival is slightly faster than the RX 7900 XT?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT has an average score of 13543, which is 1.5% higher than the RX 7900 XT's 13745, making it a marginally faster alternative.

Q: Is the RX 7900 XT's score in the 55th percentile of all GPUs?

A: Yes, the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus field is 55, indicating it performs better than 55% of all GPUs in the database.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1920x1080?

A: Low settings average 279.9 FPS, while Ultra averages 116.9 FPS, a difference of 163 FPS or a 58.2% reduction in performance when enabling the highest preset.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 741 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve. This places it in the top 20% of all configurations in the database. The percentileVsAllCpus for the CPU is 81, meaning the processor outperforms 81% of all CPUs tested, while the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus is 55, indicating it outperforms 55% of all GPUs. The discrepancy between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing, which is reflected in the high frame rates at lower resolutions where CPU performance matters more.

The rank of 741 out of 3700 means there are 740 combos that perform better in Evolve, but the vast majority of the 3700 tested configurations—roughly 2959—fall below this combo. This ranking is influenced by the game's age and the fact that it is an FPS title with relatively modest requirements compared to modern releases. The data indicates that this combo is well above average for Evolve, even though the GPU's percentile is only 55. This suggests that Evolve is not particularly GPU-intensive at the resolutions tested, or that the CPU's strong single-thread performance compensates for any GPU limitations.

The ranking also reflects the fact that the RX 7900 XT is an end-of-life product, with a successor in the Navi IV architecture. Despite this, the combo still ranks in the top 20% for this game, which speaks to the raw power of the GPU and the efficiency of the CPU. Users with this combo can expect a strong experience in Evolve, particularly at 1080p and 1440p where the frame rates are exceptionally high.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT can run Evolve, but the experience depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra delivering 116.9 FPS and Low reaching 279.9 FPS. This resolution offers the best experience, with frame rates far exceeding the 60 FPS threshold on every setting.

At 2560x1440, the combo also runs the game at every preset, with Ultra averaging 83 FPS and High at 117.2 FPS. There is no risk of dropping below 60 FPS at this resolution, making it a safe choice for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 83 FPS at Ultra provides a good balance between visual quality and smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more conditional. High settings are playable at 62.9 FPS, but this is close to the 60 FPS threshold, leaving minimal headroom for demanding scenes. Medium settings at 82.9 FPS offer a more comfortable margin, while Low settings at 107.6 FPS provide the smoothest experience. Ultra settings are not playable at 4K, with an average of 46.8 FPS. Users targeting 4K should stick to High or Medium settings to ensure a consistent frame rate above 60 FPS.

The data clearly shows that this combo is more than sufficient for Evolve at 1080p and 1440p, and it remains viable at 4K with preset adjustments. The verdictByResolution data confirms that High is the best playable setting at 4K, while Ultra is the best at both 1440p and 1080p. This is a capable gaming system for Evolve, with the only caveat being the 4K Ultra preset, which falls short of the playable threshold.