Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 presents a specific performance profile for Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. The data indicates this combination delivers strong frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but requires careful settings management at 4K to maintain playability. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with 96 MB of L3 cache, provide a robust foundation, while the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth handles the game’s rendering demands. The following analysis breaks down how this hardware behaves in practice, what alternatives exist, and what settings to use for the best experience.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark database places the Ryzen 7 5800X3D at the 80th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27896. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close in aggregate performance, making them viable alternatives if availability or platform preferences differ. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887, a delta of 0% — essentially identical in overall benchmark output despite being a mobile-oriented chip. The Intel Core i9-10900K is also nearly indistinguishable, scoring 27872 with a delta of 0.1%. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27932, showing a delta of -0.1%, meaning it is marginally faster in aggregate terms. The Intel Core i5-12600KF completes the group with a score of 27799 and a delta of 0.3%. For Evolve specifically, any of these CPUs would deliver virtually the same performance headroom, as the game’s workload is unlikely to stress the differences between these chips.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rivals are less intuitive, including older and integrated solutions. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the RTX 4060 is slightly slower in aggregate benchmarks despite being generations newer. The AMD Radeon 780M integrated graphics score 17588, a delta of 0.3%, placing it nearly on par with the discrete RTX 4060 in these synthetic tests. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 score 17551 and 17509, with deltas of 0.5% and 0.7% respectively. In practical terms for Evolve, the RTX 4060’s actual measured frame rates are what matter most, and the synthetic scores suggest that other GPUs in this range might offer similar raw throughput, though driver optimizations and feature support will differ.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest quality preset that maintains at least 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 delivers an average of 81.9 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playability threshold comfortably. All four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at this resolution.

Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance, with an average of 71.1 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 56.9 FPS, and High drops to 41.4 FPS, while Ultra is unplayable at 29.8 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X3D has an average benchmark score of 27896. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, scores 27887, a delta of 0%, meaning the two are effectively tied in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4060 ranks in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. This places it above the median but not in the top tier of performance.

Q: At which resolution does the Ultra preset become unplayable?

A: The Ultra preset is unplayable at both 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, with average frame rates of 53.6 FPS and 29.8 FPS respectively. It is only playable at 1920x1080.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 127.6 FPS, while Ultra averages 53.6 FPS. This represents a difference of 74.0 FPS, showing a significant performance cost for maximum visual fidelity.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 81.9 FPS. This allows for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smooth gameplay. The data shows all presets at this resolution are playable, so users can prioritize visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, delivering an average of 78.3 FPS. The Ultra preset drops below the 60 FPS threshold at 53.6 FPS, so High is the optimal balance of quality and performance. Medium and Low presets also remain playable, but they do not offer the same visual experience as High.

At 3840x2160, only the Low preset meets the 60 FPS requirement, with an average of 71.1 FPS. The Medium preset at 56.9 FPS is close but falls short, meaning users at 4K must accept significant graphical compromises to maintain smooth frame rates.

The Verdict

This PC configuration can run Evolve, but the experience depends heavily on the chosen resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with all presets including Ultra clearing the 60 FPS threshold — Ultra averages 81.9 FPS, while High, Medium, and Low achieve 114.6, 147.2, and 188.8 FPS respectively. This is the sweet spot for this hardware, offering maximum visual quality without any performance concerns.

At 2560x1440, the system remains playable but with limitations. The High preset averages 78.3 FPS, which is solid, and Medium at 99.1 FPS and Low at 127.6 FPS are also viable. However, Ultra drops to 53.6 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Users with 1440p monitors should stick to High or lower settings for a consistent experience.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher settings. Only Low preset at 71.1 FPS clears the threshold. Medium at 56.9 FPS and High at 41.4 FPS are below 60 FPS, and Ultra is effectively unplayable at 29.8 FPS. This resolution is only recommended for users willing to accept low graphical settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high. The Low preset averages 188.8 FPS, Medium averages 147.2 FPS, High averages 114.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 81.9 FPS. All presets deliver well above the 60 FPS threshold, with significant headroom even at Ultra.

At 2560x1440, performance scales predictably. The Low preset averages 127.6 FPS, Medium averages 99.1 FPS, High averages 78.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 53.6 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra represents a substantial 24.7 FPS decrease, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a heavy load on the GPU at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limits become clear. The Low preset averages 71.1 FPS, Medium averages 56.9 FPS, High averages 41.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 29.8 FPS. The progression shows a steady decline, with each settings tier costing roughly 12-15 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 41.3 FPS, demonstrating the extreme performance cost of high settings at 4K.

Across all resolutions, the data shows no variance data (min/max FPS are not provided), but the average frame rates are consistent with the expected behavior of this CPU and GPU combination.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and RTX 4060 ranks 2043 out of 3700 tested combos for Evolve. This places it in the 55th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of configurations but is not among the top performers. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this pairing — the CPU is strong, ranking in the 80th percentile, but the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking pulls the overall combo down.

The measured performance data supports this ranking. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent frame rates that would satisfy most users, but at 3840x2160, it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at medium and higher settings. This suggests that the RTX 4060 is the limiting factor for high-resolution play, while the CPU provides ample headroom for the game’s processing demands. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this combo ranks reasonably well; for 4K enthusiasts, the ranking reflects its limitations. The 3700 total combos tested indicate a wide field, and this system sits in the middle, making it a practical choice for mainstream gaming rather than a high-end configuration.