Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
306 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
156 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
248 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
105 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
4.4ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 86 110 141
1440p QHD 105 151 193 248
1080p Full HD 156 225 279 306

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 225
1920x1080 Low 306
1920x1080 Medium 279
1920x1080 Ultra 156
2560x1440 High 151
2560x1440 Low 248
2560x1440 Medium 193
2560x1440 Ultra 105
3840x2160 High 86
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 110
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination produces a decisive performance profile for Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. Measured benchmark data shows this pairing ranks 145th out of 3,700 tested configurations, placing it in the top 4% of all combos. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Raphael part with a 4.50 GHz boost clock and 96 MB of shared L3 cache, carries a launch MSRP of $269, while the RTX 4090, an Ada Lovelace flagship with 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, carries a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD. Across all resolutions, the system sustains playable frame rates, with the most demanding preset at each resolution hitting at least 60 FPS, as the data confirms.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured averages reveal a clear hierarchy. On Low settings, the combo delivers 141 FPS. Stepping up to Medium drops the average to 110 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 93 FPS and maximum of 126 FPS. High settings yield 86 FPS, and Ultra settles at exactly 60 FPS. The transition from Low to Ultra costs 81 FPS, a 57% reduction in average frame rate. Notably, the min/max data is only available for the Medium preset at this resolution, indicating that the frame pacing is most variable there.

Moving to 2560x1440, the headroom expands considerably. Low settings produce 248 FPS, Medium averages 193 FPS with a minimum of 164 FPS and maximum of 221 FPS, High reaches 151 FPS, and Ultra maintains 105 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 143 FPS, which is nearly double the 4K delta. This suggests that at 1440p, the GPU is still heavily engaged but has more bandwidth to exploit.

At 1920x1080, the combo becomes extremely fast. Low settings hit 306 FPS, Medium averages 279 FPS with a minimum of 237 FPS and maximum of 321 FPS, High delivers 225 FPS, and Ultra still manages 156 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is 150 FPS, the largest absolute drop across all resolutions. The min/max spread at Medium (237 to 321) shows an 84 FPS range, indicating that even at 1080p, frame times can fluctuate significantly under load. Overall, the measured data shows a monotonic decrease in FPS as settings increase, with the steepest relative penalty occurring at 4K where Ultra is exactly half of Low's average.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 145th out of 3,700 tested configurations, which places it in the 96th percentile of all combos. The CPU holds a percentile rank of 89 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44,573. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, scores 44,466, a delta of 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i9-13950HX is 0.5% higher at 44,342, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is 0.6% higher at 44,309. The only rival that scores lower is the Intel Core i5-14600 at 44,889, which is 0.7% lower than the 7500X3D. These deltas are remarkably tight, indicating that the CPU's performance is well within a single percentage point of its closest competitors.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4090 holds a percentile rank of 88 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,347. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60, scores 60,326, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140, which is 0.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, a 2.5% higher delta. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, which is 2.9% lower. The 4090's rank of 145 out of 3,700 is driven by the synergy of both components; the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile combine to place the system in the top 4% overall. The data suggests that no single component is a bottleneck at this level, as the rank is better than either component's individual percentile would predict on its own.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 7500X3D and the RTX 4090 becomes apparent when examining scaling across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the CPU's influence is strongest. The 306 FPS on Low settings is a frame rate that can only be achieved when the CPU can feed the GPU quickly enough. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,494 and multithread score of 25,047 from Passmark tests support this capability. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 150 FPS, which is the largest absolute reduction, meaning the GPU is being pushed harder as settings rise, but the CPU still maintains a high floor. At this resolution, the GPU is not the primary limiter; the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with 96 MB of L3 cache, provide enough headroom to keep the GPU saturated.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts. The drop from Low to Ultra is 143 FPS, nearly identical to 1080p, but the absolute FPS values are lower. The 4090's 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth become more relevant as pixel count increases. The CPU's role diminishes slightly, but the data shows that even at Ultra, the system maintains 105 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin. The min/max at Medium (164 to 221) indicates that the GPU is handling the load with acceptable frame pacing.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The drop from Low to Ultra is 81 FPS, which is the smallest absolute reduction across all resolutions, but the starting point is much lower (141 FPS on Low). The Ultra preset lands at exactly 60 FPS, the playable threshold. This indicates that the 4090's compute resources—16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs—are fully utilized at 4K Ultra. The CPU's contribution is less critical here, as the frame rate is limited by the GPU's pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,290.2 GTexel/s. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Ultra (156 to 60 FPS) shows a 61% reduction, which aligns with the 4x pixel count increase, confirming that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and RTX 4090 run Evolve at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra averaging exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playable threshold of 60 FPS.

Q: What is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver an average of 105 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. In fact, all presets are playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44,573. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, scores 44,466, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i5-14600 is 0.7% lower at 44,889.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4090 scores 60,347 on average. The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60,326, a 0% difference, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% higher at 60,140, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% lower at 58,657.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each component?

A: The CPU has a launch MSRP of $269, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD.

Q: How does the combo rank overall among tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 145th out of 3,700 tested configurations, placing it in the top 4% of all combos. The CPU holds an 89th percentile rank and the GPU an 88th percentile rank.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data, the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's performance is closely matched by several CPUs. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H has an average score of 44,466, a 0.2% delta from the 7500X3D, meaning it would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Evolve. The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44,342 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309 (0.6% higher). The Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44,889, which is 0.7% lower, so it would be marginally slower but still within a rounding error. For users considering a CPU swap, any of these four parts would behave almost identically in this game, with differences of less than 1% in synthetic benchmarks.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4090's nearest rivals are all within a narrow band. The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60,326, a 0% delta, meaning it would produce essentially the same frame rates as the 4090 in Evolve. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896 (2.5% higher), which would give a slight edge. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (2.9% lower), so it would be marginally slower but still in the same performance class. It is important to note that these rivals are different architectures—Arc, Vega, and RDNA—but the benchmark deltas indicate that for Evolve's specific load, the frame rates would be nearly indistinguishable. The data suggests that users with any of these GPUs paired with the 7500X3D would see very similar gameplay experiences.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages exactly 60 FPS. This is the maximum visual quality available while maintaining playability, though it leaves no headroom for frame rate drops. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 105 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold while delivering the highest visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 156 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold and allows for high refresh rate displays. In all three resolutions, the playable settings list includes High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, meaning every preset is viable. However, the best settings per resolution are Ultra at 1440p and 1080p, and Ultra at 4K—the latter being exactly at the threshold. The data confirms that this combo can run Evolve at maximum settings across all tested resolutions, with the only caveat being the exact 60 FPS average at 4K Ultra.