Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 29 | 38 | 52 |
| 1440p QHD | 37 | 51 | 67 | 90 |
| 1080p Full HD | 56 | 80 | 101 | 134 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is a combination where a modern CPU from 2023 sits alongside a Pascal-era graphics card that launched in 2016. Evolve, a 2015 FPS title, is an older game that leans far more on the GPU in this pairing, and the recorded data shows the GTX 1070 is the clear limiting factor at every tested resolution. The database contains measured results at three resolutions and four presets for this exact combination, and the short version is this: 1080p and 1440p are comfortably playable, while 4K is not.
Best Settings per Resolution
The playable threshold used across the database is 60 FPS average, and the most demanding preset that clears that bar at each resolution is as follows:
- 1920x1080: High, at 79.6 FPS average. Low hits 133.7 and Medium hits 100.9, but High is the highest preset that stays above 60. Ultra falls to 56.2 and does not qualify.
- 2560x1440: Medium, at 66.7 FPS average. Low reaches 89.8, but High drops to 50.6 and Ultra to 36.5, both below the threshold.
- 3840x2160: No preset qualifies. Even Low manages only 52.3 FPS, with Medium at 37.5, High at 29.2, and Ultra at 22.4.
The pattern is consistent: each step up in resolution knocks the top playable preset down one tier, and at 4K the combination runs out of headroom entirely.
CPU and GPU Roles
This is unambiguously a GPU-bound configuration for Evolve. The Ryzen 5 7500F is a Zen 4 (Raphael) part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 6 cores and 12 threads, a 3.70 GHz base clock and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. Its single-thread results are strong: 974 in the 3DMark single-thread test, 3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 2374 in Geekbench single-core. The multi-thread figures scale from 1902 on 2 threads to 6379 at maximum threads, showing near-linear scaling that indicates a healthy core configuration with no obvious bottlenecks in the CPU itself.
The GTX 1070, by contrast, sits at the 47th percentile versus all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 9780. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile with an average score of 24964. That percentile gap is the heart of the story: a top-quartile processor feeding a mid-pack graphics card.
The scaling data confirms it. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Low cuts frame rates from 133.7 to 89.8, and moving from 1440p to 4K cuts it further to 52.3. If the CPU were the limiter, resolution changes would have little effect on frame rates; instead, each pixel-count increase produces a proportional drop, which is the signature of GPU limitation. Preset scaling tells the same story: at 1080p, going from Low to High costs 54.1 FPS (133.7 down to 79.6), a large sensitivity to render load rather than simulation load. For a 2015 FPS title, the game's own CPU demands are modest, and the 7500F clears them with a wide margin.
Measured FPS Breakdown
All figures below are measured averages from the database for the Ryzen 5 7500F plus GTX 1070 combination. Minimum and maximum frame rates were not recorded for these runs, so averages are the basis of the verdicts.
1920x1080:
| Preset | Avg FPS |
|---|---|
| Low | 133.7 |
| Medium | 100.9 |
| High | 79.6 |
| Ultra | 56.2 |
Three of four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold. High at 79.6 provides a meaningful buffer above the threshold, roughly a third of headroom. Ultra narrowly misses at 56.2, sitting just under 4 FPS shy of playable.
2560x1440:
| Preset | Avg FPS |
|---|---|
| Low | 89.8 |
| Medium | 66.7 |
| High | 50.6 |
| Ultra | 36.5 |
Medium remains playable at 66.7, but the margin is thin at this tier: only 6.7 FPS above the threshold, which means dips below 60 are likely in heavier scenes. High at 50.6 and Ultra at 36.5 are clearly out of range.
3840x2160:
| Preset | Avg FPS |
|---|---|
| Low | 22.4 (Ultra) |
| Low (actual: 52.3) | 52.3 |
Stated plainly by preset: Ultra averages 22.4, High 29.2, Medium 37.5, and Low 52.3. Not a single preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold, and even the lowest setting falls well short. The drop from 1440p Low (89.8) to 4K Low (52.3) is steep, reflecting the 2.25x pixel count increase the GTX 1070's 1920 shading units and 6.463 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput cannot absorb at that resolution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For CPUs, the nearest rivals recorded in the database cluster extremely tightly around the Ryzen 5 7500F's average score of 24964. The Intel Core i7-11850H averages 24935, a delta of just 0.1 percent, and the Intel Core i7-13620H averages 24911, 0.2 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is effectively identical at 25005, 0.2 percent ahead, and the Intel Core 5 210H averages 24872, 0.4 percent behind. Any of these processors would deliver indistinguishable results in Evolve, because the GPU is the binding constraint. Single-thread performance, which matters most for older FPS titles, is more than sufficient across this entire cluster.
For GPUs, the nearest rivals are older and more varied in character: the AMD FirePro W5000 averages 9803 (0.2 percent behind the GTX 1070's 9780), the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M averages 9832 (0.5 percent ahead), the NVIDIA Tesla M10 averages 9724 (0.6 percent behind), and the NVIDIA Tesla C2070 averages 9716 (0.7 percent behind). Systems built around any of these cards would be expected to land within roughly a frame per second of the recorded Evolve numbers at each preset, since a sub-1-percent average score difference translates into negligible frame rate change. Note that these are mostly professional-compute cards; a same-tier consumer replacement would be the more practical path, but the database scores above are the direct comparison points.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 5 7500F and GTX 1070 run Evolve at 1080p above 60 FPS?
A: Yes. High averages 79.6 FPS, Medium 100.9, and Low 133.7. Only Ultra (56.2) misses the threshold.
Q: What is the best preset for 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: Medium, at 66.7 FPS average. It is the most demanding preset at that resolution that stays at or above 60.
Q: Can this combination handle 4K in Evolve?
A: No. The highest result at 3840x2160 is 52.3 FPS on Low, and Ultra drops to 22.4. No preset is playable at 4K under the 60 FPS standard.
Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the bottleneck here?
A: The GPU. Frame rates drop proportionally with resolution increases (133.7 to 89.8 to 52.3 on Low across the three resolutions), which indicates a GPU limit, while the 7500F sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs in the database.
Q: How close is Ultra to playable at 1080p?
A: Fairly close: 56.2 FPS average, about 3.8 FPS short of the 60 FPS threshold. A modest reduction in demanding settings would likely close the gap.
Q: Would a similar CPU change the results?
A: No. Nearest rivals such as the Ryzen 5 8400F and Core i7-13620H score within fractions of a percent of the 7500F's average, and the GPU is the limiting component in every tested scenario.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Evolve, with clear qualifications by resolution. At 1920x1080, the verdict is positive: Low, Medium, and High all clear 60 FPS, with High at 79.6 as the recommended preset. At 2560x1440, the verdict is positive with reduced headroom: Low and Medium are playable, Medium at 66.7 being the best option, while High (50.6) and Ultra (36.5) are not. At 3840x2160, the verdict is negative: no preset reaches 60 FPS, and even Low caps out at 52.3.
The practical recommendation from the data is to play at 1080p on High for the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, or at 1440p on Medium if the display demands it. The GTX 1070's 8 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 256.3 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for this older title's texture demands, but its raw compute throughput is what sets the ceiling at higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database's recorded results for Evolve, this CPU and GPU combination ranks 3086 out of 3700 tested combinations. That places it in the bottom sixth of the field, which deserves context: the ranking spans all tested hardware pairings, including far newer GPUs, and the GTX 1070's 47th-percentile standing among all GPUs explains most of the position. The CPU contributes nothing negative here, ranking in the top quartile of processors with rivals within half a percent of its average score.
The rank should therefore be read as a statement about the GPU, not the pairing's viability. A bottom-sixth rank coexists with fully playable results at two of three resolutions, because Evolve is a 2015 title with modest demands by modern standards. The combination is playable where it matters, and the low rank reflects the database's breadth of tested hardware rather than any failure to run the game acceptably.