Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 32 | 40 | 52 |
| 1440p QHD | 39 | 56 | 71 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 58 | 83 | 106 | 137 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a comfortable Evolve experience at 1080p and 1440p, with measured data showing 83 FPS average on High settings at 1920x1080 and 71 FPS average on Medium at 2560x1440. At 3840x2160, however, no preset clears the 60 FPS playable threshold — the best result is 52 FPS on Low. Evolve, a 2015-release FPS, is far from demanding by modern standards, and this combination of a Zen 4 six-core CPU and an Xe2-HPG-based Battlemage GPU handles it with room to spare at mainstream resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 5 7500F + Arc B570 run Evolve at 60 FPS?
A: Yes, at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. At 1080p, Low (137 FPS), Medium (106 FPS), and High (83 FPS) all average above 60 FPS; only Ultra falls short at 58 FPS. At 1440p, Low (92 FPS) and Medium (71 FPS) clear the bar, while High (56 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) do not. At 4K, no preset reaches 60 FPS — the highest average is 52 FPS on Low.
Q: What is the best-looking setting that stays playable at each resolution?
A: At 1920x1080, High at 83 FPS average. At 2560x1440, Medium at 71 FPS average. At 3840x2160, there is no playable preset; the closest is Low at 52 FPS.
Q: How does this CPU/GPU combo rank among tested configurations for Evolve?
A: It ranks 2971 out of 3700 tested combos — in the lower portion of the field for this specific game, though still fully capable of a 60 FPS experience at up to 1440p.
Q: How strong are the individual components?
A: The Ryzen 5 7500F sits in the 77th percentile versus all CPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of 24964. The Arc B570 sits in the 65th percentile versus all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 20556.
Q: What hardware performs similarly to the Ryzen 5 7500F?
A: Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-11850H (within 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (-0.2%), the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.2%), and the Intel Core 5 210H (0.4%) — all effectively interchangeable in overall benchmark terms.
Q: What GPUs behave like the Arc B570?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (within 0.1%), the Intel Arc A750 (-0.1%), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (-0.5%) are statistically adjacent in average score.
How This Combo Ranks
Across the 3700 hardware combinations tested in Evolve, the Ryzen 5 7500F and Arc B570 pairing sits at rank 2971. That placement reflects the composition of the leaderboard more than any deficiency in this build: Evolve launched in 2015, and the dataset presumably includes many high-end pairings whose extra headroom goes unused at the settings that matter here. The practical takeaway is that rank and playability diverge — a combo in the lower half of the field still posts 137 FPS at 1080p Low and 106 FPS at 1080p Medium in this title.
The component-level percentiles frame the ranking. The 7500F, at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, is actually the stronger half of this pairing relative to its market, while the B570 at the 65th percentile of GPUs is the more modest contributor. In a game of this age, neither component is pushed hard at 1080p, which is why the measured averages at that resolution cluster well above the playable threshold across three of four presets.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Judging by the nearest-rivals data, several substitutions would produce a near-identical Evolve experience. On the CPU side, the Intel Core i7-11850H, AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, Intel Core i7-13620H, and Intel Core 5 210H all sit within half a percent of the 7500F's average benchmark score of 24964 — deltas of 0.1%, -0.2%, 0.2%, and 0.4% respectively. Any of these processors would deliver effectively the same frame delivery in a title like Evolve.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc A750 is the closest analog at a delta of just -0.1% against the B570's average score of 20556, making it the most direct stand-in among the listed rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile sits within 0.1%, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M within 0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X within -0.5%. Swapping the B570 for any of these cards should shift Evolve's frame rates only marginally, preserving the same resolution and preset conclusions reached below.
The Verdict
Yes — this PC runs Evolve, with the caveat that resolution choice matters. At 1920x1080, the verdict data lists Low, Medium, and High as playable settings, with High as the best option at 83 FPS average. At 2560x1440, Low and Medium are playable, with Medium the best at 71 FPS average. At 3840x2160, the playable settings list is empty: the best achievable average is 52 FPS on Low, 39 FPS on Medium-tier High, and it degrades to 22 FPS on Ultra. Anyone targeting 4K on this hardware in Evolve will need to accept frame rates below the 60 FPS threshold at every preset.
For a 60 FPS target — the threshold used throughout this dataset — 1080p is the sweet spot with three presets to choose from, and 1440p remains viable with two.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured scaling points to a GPU-bound profile at higher resolutions. Moving from 1080p to 1440p cuts the Medium average from 106 FPS to 71 FPS — a drop of 35 FPS — and moving from 1440p to 4K cuts it further to 40 FPS. If the CPU were the limiting factor, raising resolution would flatten frame rates; here they fall steeply, which indicates the Arc B570 is the component doing the heavy lifting and the first to run out of headroom as pixel counts rise.
The Ryzen 5 7500F, meanwhile, shows no sign of constraint. Its single-thread score of 974 in 3DMark and 2374 in Geekbench, alongside a multi-thread Passmark result of 26825, place it comfortably ahead of what a 2015 FPS requires. That is consistent with the 1080p Low result of 137 FPS: frame rates that high are only reachable when the processor can feed the renderer quickly enough. At 1080p, where the GPU workload is lightest, the CPU's contribution is most visible — and the data shows no ceiling below the GPU's own limits. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU dominates almost entirely, and preset choice rather than CPU throughput determines the outcome.
Preset scaling tells the same story from the other direction. At 1080p, dropping from Ultra (58 FPS) to High lifts the average to 83 FPS, and Low reaches 137 FPS — a spread of 79 FPS across presets that reflects GPU-side rendering cost, not processor scheduling.
Best Settings per Resolution
- 1920x1080 — High: 83 FPS average. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. Medium runs at 106 FPS and Low at 137 FPS for additional headroom; Ultra at 58 FPS misses the threshold by 2 FPS.
- 2560x1440 — Medium: 71 FPS average. The best playable preset at this resolution. Low offers 92 FPS; High drops to 56 FPS and Ultra to 39 FPS.
- 3840x2160 — none. No preset meets 60 FPS. Low averages 52 FPS, Medium 40, High 32, and Ultra 22.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080. Low averages 137 FPS. Medium averages 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 and a maximum of 122 — the only 1080p result with recorded min/max figures, and the tightest frame range in the dataset relative to its average. High averages 83 FPS. Ultra averages 58 FPS, falling 2 FPS short of the playable threshold, making it the sole 1080p preset that misses the cut.
2560x1440. Low averages 92 FPS, the only 1440p preset with substantial headroom above 60. Medium averages 71 FPS, with a minimum of 60 and a maximum of 82 — the minimum lands exactly on the threshold, meaning dips touch but do not breach it. High averages 56 FPS and Ultra averages 39 FPS, both below the bar.
3840x2160. Low averages 52 FPS — the best 4K result and still 8 FPS short of playable. Medium averages 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 and a maximum of 47. High averages 32 FPS. Ultra averages 22 FPS, the lowest figure in the dataset and roughly one-sixth of the 1080p Low result.
The overall picture is consistent: measured data (not estimated) shows this pairing delivering a smooth Evolve experience through 1440p Medium, with 1080p High as the recommended balance of image quality and frame rate, and 4K out of reach at any preset without accepting sub-60 performance.