Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Evolve
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 32 | 40 | 52 |
| 1440p QHD | 39 | 56 | 71 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 58 | 83 | 106 | 137 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B570 combination presents a classic mid-range pairing for a game like Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. The data indicates that this system is highly capable at mainstream resolutions, though 4K gaming demands significant compromises. The benchmark results show clear scaling patterns across the three tested resolutions, with the system's performance envelope defined by both the CPU's compute throughput and the GPU's rasterization capabilities.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Evolve at 1080p with maximum settings?
A: No. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system produces an average of 58 FPS, which falls just below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings at the same resolution deliver an average of 83 FPS, making it the highest playable preset.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings are the most demanding preset that maintains playability, yielding an average of 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS. Low settings reach 92 FPS, but Medium provides a better balance of visual quality and performance.
Q: Is 4K gaming possible with this hardware?
A: The data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. Even on Low settings, the average FPS is only 52, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The best result at 4K is 52 FPS on Low, while Ultra drops to 22 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F, scores 20802, which is a 0.3% difference, indicating nearly identical performance.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, ranking in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a 0.1% difference, while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, a 0.1% difference, showing very tight grouping.
Q: What is the frame time consistency like at 1080p Medium settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the system delivers an average of 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS. This 90 FPS floor indicates strong frame pacing with no significant drops below playable levels.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals how the CPU and GPU share the workload in Evolve. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 137 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 83 FPS on High, a 39% reduction. The Ryzen 5 5600GT, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides sufficient headroom at this resolution to keep the Arc B570 fed, as the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck when settings increase. The CPU's single-thread score of 913 in 3DMark and its 74th percentile ranking support this, as the game's FPS logic benefits from strong per-core performance.
Moving to 2560x1440, the gap between Low and High narrows to 36 FPS (from 92 to 56), indicating that the GPU is now the dominant constraint. The Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are tasked with rendering more pixels, and the frame rate scales accordingly. At 4K, this trend intensifies: the difference between Low (52 FPS) and High (32 FPS) is 20 FPS, and Ultra drops to 22 FPS. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS is insufficient for 4K Ultra, while the CPU's role diminishes as the resolution increases.
The preset scaling at each resolution further clarifies the division of labor. At 1080p, moving from Medium (106 FPS) to Ultra (58 FPS) costs 45% performance, which is a GPU-bound penalty. At 1440p, Medium (71 FPS) to Ultra (39 FPS) costs 45% as well, showing consistent GPU scaling. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17272 suggests it can handle the game's physics and AI workloads without becoming a limiting factor, even at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 100 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates a wide performance range across presets. Low settings produce an average of 137 FPS, which is the highest result recorded for this combination. Medium settings yield 106 FPS average, with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS, indicating smooth performance. High settings drop to 83 FPS average, while Ultra falls to 58 FPS, just below the playable threshold. The 1080p results show that the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at medium presets.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. Low settings achieve 92 FPS average, providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium settings deliver 71 FPS average, with a minimum of 60 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS, making it the recommended preset for this resolution. High settings produce 56 FPS average, which is below the playable threshold, and Ultra drops to 39 FPS. The 1440p data shows that the system can handle competitive play at medium settings without frame drops.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playability. Low settings yield 52 FPS average, which is 8 FPS below the 60 FPS target. Medium settings produce 40 FPS average, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS, indicating inconsistent frame delivery. High settings drop to 32 FPS, and Ultra falls to 22 FPS. None of the 4K presets meet the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution unsuitable for smooth gameplay.
The Verdict
The data clearly shows that this PC can run Evolve at 1080p and 1440p, but not at 4K. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold on Low (137 FPS), Medium (106 FPS), and High (83 FPS) presets. The best playable setting at this resolution is High, which delivers 83 FPS average, providing both visual quality and performance headroom. At 2560x1440, the playable settings are Low (92 FPS) and Medium (71 FPS), with Medium being the best option as it maintains a 60 FPS minimum. At 3840x2160, the verdict is negative: no preset achieves 60 FPS, with the closest being Low at 52 FPS.
For gamers targeting 1080p, this combination offers excellent performance across most presets, with only Ultra falling short. The 1440p experience is solid at medium settings, though users seeking higher visual fidelity would need to reduce resolution. The 4K results are not playable, and the system is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming. The Ryzen 5 5600GT's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with the Arc B570's 10 GB memory, provide a balanced foundation for this game's requirements.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 83 FPS. This preset provides the best visual quality available at this resolution while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium is also viable at 106 FPS, but High offers superior graphical fidelity without sacrificing playability.
At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, with an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS. This preset balances resolution and detail, ensuring that the frame rate never dips below the playable threshold. Low settings achieve 92 FPS, but Medium provides a more visually appealing experience at a still-smooth frame rate.
At 3840x2160, no setting meets the 60 FPS requirement. The closest is Low at 52 FPS, which is not playable by the defined threshold. Users attempting 4K would need to lower the resolution to 1440p or reduce other graphical options, but the data shows no playable 4K preset for this combination.
How This Combo Ranks
Among the 3700 tested combinations in the database, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 2971st in Evolve. This places it in the lower 20% of all tested systems, which is noteworthy given the individual components' percentiles. The CPU ranks in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, yet their combined performance in this specific game is relatively low. This suggests that Evolve may be particularly demanding on certain hardware configurations, or that the pairing has inefficiencies specific to this title.
The rank of 2971 out of 3700 indicates that many other combinations deliver higher frame rates in this game. However, the measured data shows playable performance at 1080p and 1440p, so the low rank reflects the competitive field rather than a fundamental inability to run the game. The system's performance at 1080p High (83 FPS) is respectable, but the 4K results drag down its overall standing.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks provide context for alternative processors. The Intel Core i5-12490F scores 20802, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 5 5600GT's 20733. The Intel Xeon 6325P scores 20821 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U scores 20826 (0.4% higher). These CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in Evolve, as their benchmark scores are within a fraction of a percent. The AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845, 0.5% higher, but its server-oriented design may not translate directly to gaming performance.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals show similar parity. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, which is 0.1% lower than the Arc B570's 20556. The Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, 0.1% higher, making it the closest match. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.5% higher, while the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.4% lower. These GPUs would behave similarly in Evolve, with frame rates within a few percentage points of the Arc B570's results.
Users seeking comparable performance could consider any of these alternatives, as the benchmark deltas are minimal. The Intel Arc A750 is particularly noteworthy as a direct competitor from the same manufacturer, offering nearly identical synthetic scores. The RTX 3070 Mobile represents a laptop-class option that matches the desktop Arc B570 in compute performance, though thermal and power constraints may affect real-world results.