Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

62%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
58 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
92 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
39 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
52 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
22 FPS
12ms Frame Time
18ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 21,088
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 22 32 40 52
1440p QHD 39 56 71 92
1080p Full HD 58 83 106 137

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 83
1920x1080 Low 137
1920x1080 Medium 106
1920x1080 Ultra 58
2560x1440 High 56
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 39
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 52
3840x2160 Medium 40
3840x2160 Ultra 22

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a clear performance picture in Evolve, with measured frame rates that scale predictably across resolutions and presets. The data shows a system that is firmly capable at 1080p, solidly playable at 1440p with settings adjustments, and out of reach for smooth 4K gameplay. This analysis walks through the measured FPS data, identifies the best settings per resolution, and examines the role of each component in determining performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data for Evolve, recorded at three resolutions and four quality presets, provides a complete map of this combo's capabilities. Starting at 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 22, which is far below the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings improve the average to 32 FPS, while Medium settings reach 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 and a maximum of 47. Low settings at 4K yield an average of 52 FPS, which is the closest this combo gets to smooth gameplay at this resolution, yet it still falls short of the 60 FPS target.

Moving down to 2560x1440, the performance picture improves substantially. Ultra settings produce an average of 39 FPS, which remains unplayable. High settings bring the average to 56 FPS, just shy of the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings cross the line with an average of 71 FPS, a minimum of 60, and a maximum of 82, making this the first preset that delivers consistently smooth gameplay. Low settings at 1440p reach 92 FPS on average, indicating headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1920x1080, the combo shows its strength. Ultra settings average 58 FPS, which is marginally below the 60 FPS target. High settings deliver a comfortable 83 FPS average. Medium settings reach 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 and a maximum of 122. Low settings top out at 137 FPS average, demonstrating that the system can handle competitive frame rates at the most common resolution.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution costs roughly 25-30 FPS at the same settings, while each step down in quality from Ultra to Low gains approximately 20-30 FPS at the same resolution. The gap between 1440p Medium (71 FPS) and 1080p Medium (106 FPS) is particularly notable, showing that resolution has a more significant impact than preset changes alone.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data identifies which settings presets clear the 60 FPS playable threshold at each resolution. At 3840x2160, no settings preset reaches 60 FPS. The best available average is 52 FPS at Low settings, but this does not meet the playability criterion, so the database records no playable settings for 4K.

At 2560x1440, two presets are playable: Low and Medium. The most demanding playable preset is Medium, which averages 71 FPS. This represents the optimal balance between visual quality and smoothness, as High settings fall to 56 FPS and Ultra drops to 39 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p also maintains a minimum of 60 FPS, ensuring that frame drops do not interrupt gameplay.

At 1920x1080, three presets are playable: High, Low, and Medium. The most demanding playable preset is High, averaging 83 FPS. This is the clear recommendation for 1080p gaming, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (106 FPS) while still maintaining a robust margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings at 1080p average 58 FPS, which fails to meet the playability standard, making High the ceiling for this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets reveals which component limits Evolve at each setting. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The Arc B570's workload increases dramatically with resolution, and the frame rates at 3840x2160 (22-52 FPS depending on preset) indicate that the graphics card cannot keep up with the pixel count. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, has ample headroom at this resolution, as the frame rate is constrained by rendering throughput rather than processor logic.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The Medium preset achieves 71 FPS, while High drops to 56 FPS and Ultra to 39 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is still the primary limiter, but the CPU's role becomes more significant. The Ryzen 5 5600G's single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 872 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1409, is sufficient to feed the GPU at these settings, but the frame rate drop from Medium to High (71 to 56 FPS) indicates that the GPU's rendering capabilities are the binding constraint.

At 1080p, the CPU and GPU roles are more balanced. The Ryzen 5 5600G's multi-thread capabilities, shown by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10551 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 8428, allow it to maintain high frame rates at Low and Medium settings (137 and 106 FPS respectively). However, the drop to 58 FPS at Ultra settings suggests that the GPU becomes the limiting factor when graphical effects are maximized. The Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for most presets, but the most demanding settings expose its limits.

The scaling data indicates that the GPU governs performance more heavily at higher resolutions, while the CPU's influence grows at 1080p where frame rates are higher and per-frame processing time is shorter. The Ryzen 5 5600G's 16 MB of L3 cache and 65 W TDP contribute to its ability to sustain high frame rates without thermal throttling, but the Arc B570's 150 W TDP and dual-slot design suggest it is the more power-hungry component.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rival data for the CPU and GPU provides context for how this combo compares to other hardware. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G has an average benchmark score of 21088, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core i3-1220P with an average score of 21066 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V at 21112 (0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U at 21133 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U at 21174 (0.4% faster). These CPUs would behave nearly identically to the Ryzen 5 5600G in Evolve, as the performance differences are negligible.

The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (0.1% faster), the Intel Arc A750 at 20582 (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.4% faster), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (0.5% slower). In Evolve, a system equipped with any of these GPUs would produce frame rates within a few percent of the Arc B570's results, making them viable alternatives for similar performance.

For users building a system around this CPU-GPU pairing, the benchmark data suggests that swapping the Ryzen 5 5600G for any of its nearest rivals would yield no meaningful change in Evolve's frame rates. Similarly, replacing the Arc B570 with an RTX 3070 Mobile or Arc A750 would result in nearly identical performance, as the delta percentages are all under 0.5%.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K?

A: No. The best 4K result is 52 FPS at Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium settings average 40 FPS, High averages 32 FPS, and Ultra averages 22 FPS.

Q: What is the best 1440p setting for this combo?

A: Medium settings deliver an average of 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 and a maximum of 82, making it the most demanding playable preset at this resolution. High settings average 56 FPS, which is below the threshold.

Q: Is 1080p Ultra playable on this system?

A: No. Ultra settings at 1920x1080 average 58 FPS, just under the 60 FPS target. High settings average 83 FPS and are the most demanding playable preset at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G's average benchmark score of 21088 places it within 0.4% of the Intel Core i3-1220P, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, and Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, meaning these CPUs perform nearly identically.

Q: What GPU is most similar to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Intel Arc A750 is the closest rival with an average score of 20582 (0.1% slower than the B570's 20556). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% faster, while the Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M390X differ by 0.4% and 0.5% respectively.

Q: Does the system have enough FPS headroom for 1440p?

A: At Medium settings, the 71 FPS average provides an 11 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold, with a minimum of 60 FPS. This is sufficient for consistent smoothness, but there is limited headroom for demanding scenes.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2971 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve, placing it in the bottom 20% of all systems evaluated. This rank reflects the system's inability to achieve playable frame rates at 4K and its limitations at 1440p Ultra settings. The benchmark percentile data for the individual components—74th for the CPU and 65th for the GPU—indicates that both parts are mid-range performers, but their combined capabilities in this specific game do not boost the system's overall standing.

The rank is consistent with the measured FPS data. At 1080p, the combo performs well with three playable presets, but at 1440p and 4K, the system's limitations become apparent. The 3700-combo pool includes systems with higher-end GPUs that can handle 4K gaming, which pushes this pairing down the rankings. For context, the GPU's 65th percentile ranking suggests it is below average among all GPUs, and when paired with a CPU that is also below the top quartile, the combined system lands in the lower portion of the overall rankings.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Evolve depends entirely on the target resolution and settings. The verdict data is clear: at 3840x2160, no settings preset achieves 60 FPS, making 4K gaming impossible with this combo. At 2560x1440, the system can run the game at Low or Medium settings, with Medium providing an average of 71 FPS and a minimum of 60 FPS, which qualifies as playable. At 1920x1080, the system excels, with High settings averaging 83 FPS, Medium averaging 106 FPS, and Low reaching 137 FPS, all comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

For users seeking the best visual experience, the data recommends High settings at 1080p (83 FPS) as the optimal configuration. For those with 1440p monitors, Medium settings (71 FPS) is the highest quality preset that maintains smooth gameplay. The system cannot handle 4K gaming under any settings, and 1080p Ultra (58 FPS) and 1440p High (56 FPS) both fall marginally below the playable threshold. This is a capable 1080p gaming system with acceptable 1440p performance at moderate settings, but it is not designed for high-resolution or maximum-quality gaming.