Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
285 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
141 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
225 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
95 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
54 FPS
4.9ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 20,468
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 78 99 128
1440p QHD 95 137 174 225
1080p Full HD 141 204 259 285

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 204
1920x1080 Low 285
1920x1080 Medium 259
1920x1080 Ultra 141
2560x1440 High 137
2560x1440 Low 225
2560x1440 Medium 174
2560x1440 Ultra 95
3840x2160 High 78
3840x2160 Low 128
3840x2160 Medium 99
3840x2160 Ultra 54

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a dominant performance profile in Evolve, with benchmark results showing that every resolution tested clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at multiple settings. The data indicates a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s six Zen 3 cores provide ample headroom for high frame rates at 1080p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces exceptional frame rates across all presets. The Low preset averages 285 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure for this combo. Medium settings average 259 FPS, with a minimum of 221 FPS and a maximum of 298 FPS. High settings average 204 FPS, while the demanding Ultra preset still averages 141 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a reduction of approximately 50% in average frame rate, yet even the most demanding preset remains far above any playability concern.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results show a proportional decline but remain remarkably strong. Low settings average 225 FPS, Medium averages 174 FPS with a minimum of 148 FPS and a maximum of 200 FPS. High settings average 137 FPS, and Ultra still delivers a smooth 95 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 130 FPS, indicating that the RTX 4080’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are not strained by the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens noticeably. Low settings produce a 128 FPS average, Medium delivers 99 FPS with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 114 FPS, and High averages 78 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to a 54 FPS average, which is the only measured configuration that dips below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The transition from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings costs 41 FPS, highlighting the raw pixel throughput demands of 4K rendering.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a clear division of labor between the Ryzen 5 5600 and the RTX 4080. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance — evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 882 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2584 — is sufficient to feed the GPU’s high frame rates. The 285 FPS Low preset result suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution, as the GPU can operate near its maximum output without being starved of draw calls.

When resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU begins to dominate the workload. The 225 FPS Low result versus the 174 FPS Medium result shows a 51 FPS drop, which is a GPU-side scaling pattern. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 5641 and max-thread score of 5659 indicate that even multi-threaded workloads are well within the processor’s capabilities. The Ryzen 5 5600’s 12 threads and 32 MB of shared L3 cache provide consistent performance without bottlenecking.

At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the primary performance driver. The 128 FPS Low result at 3840x2160 compared to the 285 FPS at 1080p Low shows a 157 FPS reduction, which correlates directly with the 4x increase in pixel count. The RTX 4080’s 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 76 RT cores are tasked with rendering 8.3 million pixels per frame, and the benchmark shows that even this powerful GPU struggles with the Ultra preset at 54 FPS. The CPU’s role at this resolution is diminished to frame pacing and physics calculations, which the 5000-series architecture handles without issue.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, with an average of 78 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 54 FPS, making High the optimal choice for 4K gaming. This setting balances visual fidelity with the 60 FPS threshold, and the 24 FPS margin above the playability limit provides some headroom for demanding scenes.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves a 95 FPS average, which is the highest quality setting available and remains comfortably above the 60 FPS barrier. The 35 FPS margin means that even with significant on-screen action, the frame rate is unlikely to drop below playable levels. This makes Ultra the clear recommendation for 1440p displays.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers a 141 FPS average, which is more than double the playable threshold. All four presets exceed 60 FPS, with even the most demanding configuration providing a smooth experience. The 141 FPS result at Ultra ensures that high-refresh-rate monitors can be fully utilized, and the system has substantial headroom for future driver optimizations.

The Verdict

This PC can run Evolve exceptionally well across all three tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best option at 78 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 54 FPS is the sole exception to the 60 FPS rule, making it unsuitable for 4K gaming with this combination.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is unequivocal: all four presets clear 60 FPS. The Ultra setting averages 95 FPS, which is the best quality-to-performance ratio among the tested configurations. The 1440p results show that this combo is overqualified for standard high-refresh-rate monitors, providing a 35 FPS buffer above the playability threshold.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 285 FPS at Low, 259 FPS at Medium, 204 FPS at High, and 141 FPS at Ultra. Every setting produces a frame rate that exceeds the needs of even 240 Hz displays. The Ultra preset’s 141 FPS average suggests that the CPU-GPU pairing is well balanced for competitive play, where high frame rates are more important than visual fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest playable setting at 3840x2160?

A: High settings are the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, with an average of 78 FPS. The Ultra preset averages only 54 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold.

Q: How does the 1440p Ultra result compare to the 1080p Ultra result?

A: At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 95 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 141 FPS. The 46 FPS difference reflects the additional pixel workload at 1440p.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded at Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160, Medium ranges from 84 FPS minimum to 114 FPS maximum. At 2560x1440, the range is 148 to 200. At 1920x1080, the range is 221 to 298.

Q: Which resolution shows the largest performance gap between Low and Ultra?

A: At 2560x1440, the gap is 130 FPS, from 225 FPS at Low to 95 FPS at Ultra. The 1080p gap is 144 FPS, and the 4K gap is 74 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance at 1920x1080?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary performer at 1080p. The 285 FPS Low result and the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 882 suggest the Ryzen 5 5600 provides sufficient processing power to avoid becoming a bottleneck.

Q: Is the RTX 4080’s memory bandwidth sufficient for 4K gaming?

A: The 716.8 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory support 4K Medium at 99 FPS and 4K High at 78 FPS. The Ultra preset’s 54 FPS result indicates that raw compute power, rather than memory bandwidth, is the limiting factor at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The Ryzen 5 5600 and RTX 4080 combination ranks 323 out of 3700 tested combos for Evolve, placing it in the top 8.7% of all configurations. This high percentile is consistent with the measured FPS results, which show strong performance at every resolution. The ranking reflects the synergy between the CPU’s 74th percentile performance among all CPUs and the GPU’s 86th percentile standing among all GPUs. The substantial frame rates at 1440p and 1080p suggest that this combo is better suited for high-refresh-rate gaming than for maximum 4K fidelity, given the Ultra preset’s 54 FPS result at that resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU’s nearest rivals provide insight into hardware that would behave similarly in this configuration. The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has an average score of 20454, which is 0.1% different from the Ryzen 5 5600’s 20468 average. This indicates that swapping the AMD processor for this Intel part would result in nearly identical frame rates. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G offers a 0.2% difference at 20425, making it another close match. The AMD EPYC 9454P and EPYC 7713, with scores of 20422 and 20363 respectively, also fall within 0.5% of the Ryzen 5 5600, though these server-class processors would be impractical for gaming desktops.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest rival with an average score of 54209, just 0.1% different from the RTX 4080’s 54247. This means the SUPER variant would produce virtually identical FPS in Evolve. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher, and would provide a marginal performance increase. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S score 55698 and 55757 respectively, representing 2.6% and 2.7% higher scores. These alternatives suggest that users seeking similar performance could consider the RTX 4080 SUPER as a direct substitute, while the AMD options would offer slightly better benchmark results but with different driver and feature characteristics.