Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Evolve
FPS 2015

Evolve

72%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
195 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
85 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
57 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
77 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
33 FPS
8.1ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,482
Your CPU 21,484
Graphics Card
Required 27,876
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 47 60 77
1440p QHD 57 83 105 136
1080p Full HD 85 123 157 195

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Low 195
1920x1080 Medium 157
1920x1080 Ultra 85
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 105
2560x1440 Ultra 57
3840x2160 High 47
3840x2160 Low 77
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 Ultra 33

Performance Analysis: Evolve on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 sits in a dense performance neighborhood. The database shows its average benchmark score at 21,484, placing it in the 75th percentile among all tested CPUs. The nearest rivals are remarkably close in raw average scoring. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V records an average score of 21,440, a mere 0.2% behind the Ryzen. The Intel Core i9-11900H is also nearly identical at 21,367, which is 0.5% slower. On the other side, the Intel Xeon D-1746TER posts 21,635, edging out the Ryzen by 0.7%, while the AMD EPYC 9454 reaches 21,223, sitting 1.2% behind. These deltas are small enough that in a game like Evolve, any of these processors would deliver broadly similar frame pacing. The practical takeaway: if a system already has one of these CPUs installed, swapping to the Ryzen 5 2600 would not produce a meaningful shift in CPU-bound scenarios.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 carries an average benchmark score of 26,331 and lands in the 72nd percentile of all tested GPUs. Its nearest rivals are again tightly grouped. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26,401, just 0.3% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 also scores 26,421, again 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% ahead at 26,553. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT falls 1.2% behind at 26,011. In practical terms, these four GPUs should behave almost interchangeably in Evolve at the same settings and resolution. The data suggests the RTX 5060 is not an outlier in its class; it is squarely within a cluster of similarly performing graphics cards. When reading the measured FPS results for this combo, it is reasonable to expect nearby GPUs to produce within a few frames of the same averages.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Evolve at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, but only on Low and Medium settings. At 3840x2160, Low averages 77 FPS and Medium averages 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and maximum of 69 FPS. High drops to 47 FPS and Ultra falls to 33 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best setting at 2560x1440?

A: High is the most demanding preset that stays playable at 1440p. It averages 83 FPS. Medium averages 105 FPS and Low averages 136 FPS, but High offers the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS bar. Ultra averages 57 FPS, just under the threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26,331. The AMD Radeon 860M is 0.3% higher at 26,401, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is 0.3% higher at 26,421, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% higher at 26,553, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% lower at 26,011. These are all within a narrow band.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 2600 a strong CPU by modern standards?

A: The CPU sits in the 75th percentile of all tested CPUs with an average benchmark score of 21,484. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, is only 0.2% different in average score. It holds up well in the mid-range, though it is not near the top of the database.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1920x1080 on Ultra?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the combo averages 85 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. For comparison, High averages 123 FPS, Medium averages 157 FPS, and Low averages 195 FPS at the same resolution.

Q: Does the system ever drop below 60 FPS at playable settings?

A: Only at 4K Medium, where the minimum recorded FPS is 51. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 90 FPS and at 1080p Medium the minimum is 134 FPS. The 4K Medium preset is the only playable setting where the minimum dips below 60.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers four settings across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo starts at 195 FPS average on Low. Medium drops to 157 FPS average, with a minimum of 134 FPS and maximum of 181 FPS. High averages 123 FPS, and Ultra averages 85 FPS. All 1080p presets clear the playable threshold with substantial margin.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages scale downward as expected. Low delivers 136 FPS average. Medium averages 105 FPS, with a minimum of 90 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS. High averages 83 FPS. Ultra is the only 1440p preset that fails to reach 60 FPS, averaging 57 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra at this resolution is 26 FPS, which suggests Ultra imposes a heavy load on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the picture changes significantly. Low averages 77 FPS. Medium averages exactly 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and maximum of 69 FPS. High falls to 47 FPS average, and Ultra bottoms out at 33 FPS average. The 4K data shows a steep drop-off between Medium and High, a 13 FPS difference, and an even larger 27 FPS drop from High to Ultra. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium is worth noting: at 51 FPS, there will be moments below the 60 FPS target even on a preset that averages exactly at the threshold.

The pattern across resolutions is consistent. At 1080p, even Ultra is smooth. At 1440p, High is the ceiling. At 4K, only Low and Medium are viable, and Medium sits right at the edge with its minimum dipping into the 50s.

The Verdict

This PC can run Evolve, but the answer depends heavily on resolution. According to the verdict data, at 3840x2160 the playable settings are Low and Medium, with Medium being the best option at an average of 60 FPS. That is exactly at the playable threshold, so it is functional but not headroom-heavy. At 2560x1440, the playable settings expand to High, Low, and Medium. The best setting is High with an average of 83 FPS, which gives a comfortable margin above 60. At 1920x1080, every preset is playable: High, Low, Medium, and Ultra. The best setting is Ultra at 85 FPS average.

The verdict is clear. At 1080p, this combo has no trouble with Evolve, even at maximum settings. At 1440p, it remains strong, with High delivering a smooth experience. At 4K, the system is playable only if the user accepts Medium settings or lower, and even then the minimum FPS at Medium is 51, which could cause occasional stutter in demanding scenes. For anyone targeting a locked 60 FPS experience, 1440p High is the sweet spot. For 4K, the data suggests staying on Low for safety or accepting the borderline Medium preset.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Medium, with an average FPS of 60. The minimum of 51 FPS means it is not a rock-solid 60, but the average meets the threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, averaging 83 FPS. This is a strong result, leaving 23 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium and Low are also playable but offer lower visual quality.

At 1920x1080, the best playable preset is Ultra, averaging 85 FPS. This is the highest settings tier available in the data, and the combo handles it with 25 FPS of headroom. For users who want maximum visual fidelity, 1080p Ultra is the clear choice.

These results indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU has enough headroom at 1080p to let the GPU stretch, but at 4K the GPU cannot maintain high preset performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1789 out of 3700 tested combos in Evolve. That places it roughly in the middle of the database, just past the halfway point. In percentile terms, it sits around the 51.6% mark, meaning about 48.4% of tested combos perform better in this game.

This mid-pack ranking is somewhat surprising given the GPU's strong average benchmark score. The RTX 5060 is in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, and the CPU is in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Yet when combined in Evolve, the rank drops to the middle of the pack. The likely explanation is that Evolve, released in 2015, may not scale well with modern hardware, or the combination hits a bottleneck at certain settings. The measured FPS data supports this: at 1080p Ultra the combo averages 85 FPS, which is respectable but not exceptional for a GPU of this class. The data shows the combo is capable, but it is not a top-tier performer in this specific title.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 2600 and the RTX 5060 becomes clearer when comparing FPS scaling across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 195 on Low to 85 on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 110 FPS, a massive spread that indicates the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting. At 1440p, the spread narrows to 79 FPS, from 136 on Low to 57 on Ultra. At 4K, the spread narrows further to 44 FPS, from 77 on Low to 33 on Ultra.

This pattern shows that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes more dominant. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, has enough single-thread performance to keep up at lower resolutions, where frame rates are high. At 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor in the Low and Medium presets, since the GPU could theoretically push even higher frame rates if the CPU could feed it faster. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the frame rates drop dramatically regardless of preset.

The preset scaling also tells a story. At 4K, going from Low to Medium costs 17 FPS, while going from Medium to High costs 13 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 14 FPS. These are relatively even steps. At 1440p, Low to Medium costs 31 FPS, Medium to High costs 22 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 26 FPS. At 1080p, Low to Medium costs 38 FPS, Medium to High costs 34 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 38 FPS. The larger jumps at lower resolutions suggest the GPU has more headroom there, and each preset step has a bigger absolute impact.

For Evolve specifically, the data implies the RTX 5060 is the component to upgrade if 4K performance matters. The Ryzen 5 2600 is sufficient at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU cannot handle Ultra at 1440p or High at 4K. Conversely, if a user only plays at 1080p, the CPU could become a constraint at Low and Medium settings, where frame rates exceed 150 FPS. The measured results indicate a balanced pairing for mainstream 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the GPU taking over as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.