Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

90%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
185 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
77 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
132 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
55 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
82 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
8.1ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 64,640
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 55 67 82
1440p QHD 55 88 108 132
1080p Full HD 77 124 151 185

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 124
1920x1080 Low 185
1920x1080 Medium 151
1920x1080 Ultra 77
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 132
2560x1440 Medium 108
2560x1440 Ultra 55
3840x2160 High 55
3840x2160 Low 82
3840x2160 Medium 67
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p gaming experience in Downfall, with 4K remaining a viable option at reduced settings. The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions, with the system demonstrating strong headroom for high refresh rates at lower resolutions while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at 4K Ultra.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The benchmark data places both components within well-established performance brackets. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 achieves an average benchmark score of 64,640, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database show remarkably tight clustering: the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64,438 (0.3% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65,104 (0.7% higher). The AMD EPYC 7343 trails slightly at 64,202, a 0.7% deficit. This sub-1% variance across all four rivals means that in CPU-bound scenarios, swapping between these processors would yield virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Downfall.

For the graphics side, the Intel Arc B580 sits at the 68th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 23,021. Its nearest rivals form a similarly tight group: the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23,061 (0.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22,895 (0.6% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23,172 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249 (1.0% higher). The presence of the RTX 3080 in this grouping is notable — despite being a higher-tier product, its average benchmark score lands within 1% of the Arc B580, suggesting that in Downfall specifically, these cards would produce similar average frame rates. The RTX 2080, an older generation card, also falls within this narrow band, indicating that the Arc B580 competes effectively with established NVIDIA offerings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 185 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 151 FPS on Medium and 124 FPS on High. The scaling from Low to High represents a 33% performance reduction, indicating that the GPU is actively engaged but the CPU maintains sufficient headroom to keep frame rates high. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 77 FPS, a substantial 38% drop from High, which points to the GPU becoming increasingly stressed by the most demanding settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern intensifies. Low settings produce 132 FPS, Medium drops to 108 FPS, High to 88 FPS, and Ultra to 55 FPS. The transition from 1080p Low (185 FPS) to 1440p Low (132 FPS) represents a 29% reduction, while the 1440p Ultra figure of 55 FPS falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This suggests that at 1440p, the GPU is the limiting factor for Ultra settings, as the CPU's performance headroom cannot compensate for the increased pixel workload.

At 3840x2160, the GPU bottleneck becomes dominant. Low settings yield 82 FPS, Medium 67 FPS, High 55 FPS, and Ultra drops to 34 FPS. The scaling from 1440p Low to 4K Low shows a 38% reduction, and from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra a 38% reduction as well. This consistent ~38% penalty across the resolution jump indicates the GPU is the primary constraint at 4K, with the CPU's role diminishing as pixel throughput demands increase. The difference between 1080p Ultra (77 FPS) and 4K Ultra (34 FPS) — a 56% reduction — further underscores that resolution scaling hits the Arc B580's bandwidth and compute limits hard.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 2,802 out of 3,716 tested configurations for Downfall, placing it in the 75th percentile of all combos. This mid-to-upper tier ranking reflects the system's ability to handle the game at high settings across most resolutions, but it also shows that a substantial number of configurations outperform it. The rank is consistent with the component-level percentiles: the CPU at the 93rd percentile pulls the combo upward, while the GPU at the 68th percentile prevents it from reaching the top quartile. The data suggests that in Downfall, the GPU is the limiting factor for the combo's overall ranking — a CPU from the top 7% of all processors cannot fully realize its potential when paired with a GPU in the 68th percentile, particularly at higher resolutions where the Arc B580's 12 GB memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth become the binding constraints.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, but only at Low and Medium settings. The measured data shows 82 FPS average on Low and 67 FPS average on Medium at 3840x2160. High settings drop to 55 FPS, and Ultra falls to 34 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: High settings at 2560x1440 produce an 88 FPS average, which is the highest preset that maintains at least 60 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution drop to 55 FPS, so High is the recommended choice for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score is 23,021, while the RTX 2080 scores 22,895, a difference of 0.6%. This places them within 1% of each other, indicating comparable overall performance in the benchmark database.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the system achieves 185 FPS on Low and 124 FPS on High, indicating the CPU has sufficient headroom and the GPU is the primary factor in frame rate variation across settings. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures it does not bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p Ultra?

A: The measured data shows 77 FPS average at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, making Ultra a playable configuration at this resolution.

Q: Does the system support ray tracing for this game?

A: The Intel Arc B580 features 20 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing capabilities. However, the FACT PACK does not include ray tracing performance data for Downfall, so no specific frame rate information is available.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest performance. Low settings produce an average of 185 FPS. Medium settings yield 151 FPS average, with a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 174 FPS. High settings achieve 124 FPS average. Ultra settings produce 77 FPS average. All presets at 1080p exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU's limits. Low settings deliver 132 FPS average. Medium settings reach 108 FPS average, with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 124 FPS. High settings achieve 88 FPS average. Ultra settings drop to 55 FPS average, falling below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system's 4K capabilities are constrained. Low settings produce 82 FPS average. Medium settings achieve 67 FPS average, with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS. High settings yield 55 FPS average. Ultra settings fall to 34 FPS average, representing a 59% reduction compared to the 1080p Ultra figure.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which produces 77 FPS average. This is the highest setting available and comfortably clears the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the best playable preset is High, delivering 88 FPS average. While Medium (108 FPS) and Low (132 FPS) also exceed 60 FPS, High offers the best visual quality while remaining above the threshold. Ultra at 55 FPS is not recommended for consistent smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the best playable preset is Medium, achieving 67 FPS average. Low (82 FPS) also qualifies, but Medium provides superior visuals while remaining above 60 FPS. High (55 FPS) and Ultra (34 FPS) fall short of the playable threshold.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B580 combination can run Downfall effectively across all tested resolutions, with specific settings limitations at higher resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system achieves playable frame rates on all presets, including Ultra at 77 FPS. At 2560x1440, High settings deliver 88 FPS, while Ultra falls to 55 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, Medium settings produce 67 FPS, but High and Ultra configurations drop to 55 FPS and 34 FPS respectively. The verdict data confirms that Low and Medium are playable at 4K; High, Low, and Medium are playable at 1440p; and all four presets are playable at 1080p. The system's 75th percentile combo ranking reflects its balanced performance, with the CPU's substantial headroom enabling smooth gameplay at lower resolutions while the GPU defines the ceiling at 4K.