Downfall

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Downfall, a 2016 horror title. Benchmark data shows this pairing is overwhelmingly powerful for this game, clearing 60 FPS at every resolution and preset combination tested, including 4K Ultra. The data indicates a massive performance headroom, making this system a definitive overachiever for the game's demands.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, the data confirms it can run at 3840x2160 on all tested settings. The average frame rate at Ultra settings is 62 FPS, which is the lowest recorded for this resolution but still clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest quality setting that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is playable, with an average frame rate of 100 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested, and it maintains a significant margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48995. This puts it within a very tight performance band of its rivals, with a -0.4% delta compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and a +0.8% delta compared to the Intel Core i5-14600K.

Q: Is the GPU's performance similar to any other graphics cards?

A: Yes, the data shows the RTX 5070's average score of 40377 is closely matched by several AMD Radeon Pro cards. It is just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this system?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 334, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset. This shows the system's capability to push frame rates far beyond the requirements of a 60Hz display at lower resolutions.

Q: Does the system ever drop below 60 FPS in the measured data?

A: No, the lowest average FPS recorded across all resolutions and presets is 62 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. The minimum FPS data available also supports this, with the lowest recorded minimum being 103 FPS at 4K Medium settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals that this game is far less demanding on the CPU and GPU than what this combo offers. The performance scaling between resolutions indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, though even that bottleneck is incredibly high. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 140 FPS to 100 FPS, a 40 FPS reduction. The subsequent jump to 3840x2160 Ultra yields a further drop to 62 FPS, another 38 FPS reduction. This consistent decline with increasing pixel count strongly suggests that the graphics card is the limiting factor, as the workload scales directly with resolution.

The CPU's role appears to be secondary, as even at the lowest resolution and preset (1920x1080 Low), the system achieves 334 FPS. This extreme frame rate indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more data than is necessary for this title, even at its most demanding settings. The CPU's high single-thread performance, evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4394, likely prevents any CPU-bound limitations from appearing, even in a horror game that may have physics or AI calculations. The processing headroom is substantial, as the system is never close to a CPU performance ceiling.

The scaling from Low to Ultra presets at each resolution also highlights the GPU's dominance. At 2560x1440, the average FPS goes from 238 on Low to 100 on Ultra, a 58% reduction in performance. This is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario where increasing graphical fidelity directly impacts the render time. The game's age is a factor here, as modern GPUs like the RTX 5070, which scores in the 82nd percentile, are able to brute-force this title with ease. The data shows a system that is never stressed, with the GPU's rendering capabilities far exceeding the game's requirements.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 sits in a very narrow performance band. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, has an average score of 49196, which is just 0.4% higher. In practical terms, a system with this AMD processor would deliver virtually identical frame rates in Downfall. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is also extremely close, with an average score of 49228, a 0.5% delta. These differences are within the margin of error for benchmarking and would not produce a noticeable difference in gameplay.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5070's nearest rivals are professional workstation cards. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 has an average score of 40318, just 0.1% lower, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is slightly higher, with an average score of 40870, a -1.2% delta from the RTX 5070. While these cards are not typically used for gaming, the data suggests they would produce nearly identical performance in Downfall. A user with any of these GPUs would see the same high frame rates, reinforcing that this game is not a demanding benchmark for modern hardware.

The fact that the RTX 5070's closest competition comes from older professional cards, rather than newer gaming GPUs, reflects its raw power. In this specific title, the choice between these GPUs is irrelevant, as all of them far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold at the highest settings.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Downfall? The data unequivocally answers yes. The verdict by resolution confirms that every single tested configuration is playable. At 3840x2160, the system averages 62 FPS on Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This makes it a definitive 4K Ultra-capable machine for this game.

At 2560x1440, performance is even more comfortable. The Ultra preset averages 100 FPS, and the High preset averages 160 FPS. This resolution provides a perfect balance of visual fidelity and high refresh rate capability. For 1920x1080, the system is massively overqualified, with the Ultra preset averaging 140 FPS. This means a user with a 144Hz monitor could play at 1080p with all settings maxed out and still have headroom. This system is not just capable of running the game; it is capable of running it at the highest settings with high frame rates at any resolution, making it an ideal choice for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are high but show the most variance. On Low settings, the system averages 148 FPS. Moving to Medium drops the average to 121 FPS, with a minimum of 103 FPS and a maximum of 139 FPS. The High preset averages 99 FPS, and the most demanding Ultra preset brings the average down to 62 FPS. This is the only configuration that comes close to the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the system delivers excellent performance across the board. The Low preset is exceptionally fast, averaging 238 FPS. The Medium preset averages 195 FPS, with a minimum and maximum of 166 and 224 FPS, respectively. The High preset averages 160 FPS, and the Ultra preset still manages an impressive 100 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra here is substantial, showing the scaling of graphical load.

At 1920x1080, the system operates at its peak. The Low preset produces an astronomical 334 FPS average. The Medium preset is also very fast, averaging 273 FPS with a minimum of 232 FPS and a maximum of 314 FPS. The High preset averages 224 FPS, and the Ultra preset is still able to maintain a 140 FPS average. These numbers indicate that the system is never stressed, and the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 768th out of 3716 tested combos in the database for this game. This places it in the top 21% of all systems tested. While this might seem lower than expected given the absolute performance, it is important to consider the context. Downfall is a 2016 title, and many systems with more powerful, modern components can achieve similar high frame rates.

The rank is more indicative of the system's placement among other high-end hardware, rather than a measure of its ability to run the game. Since the system clears the playable threshold with ease at all settings, the rank reflects a performance ceiling that has been reached. The high percentile of the individual components (90th for the CPU, 82nd for the GPU) shows that this is a top-tier setup, but the game's low requirements mean that even mid-range systems can achieve comparable results. This rank, therefore, confirms it is a very capable gaming PC, but the game itself doesn't differentiate well between the top performers.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra. The system averages 62 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset tested and offers the highest visual quality while remaining playable.

For 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra. The system averages 100 FPS at this setting, providing a substantial performance buffer. This is the best choice for a high refresh rate monitor, as it provides a fluid experience with all graphical features enabled.

For 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra as well. With an average of 140 FPS, this configuration delivers the highest frame rates while maintaining maximum visual fidelity. This is the ideal setup for competitive play or for users who prioritize a very high, consistent frame rate. The data shows that the Ultra preset is the optimal choice at every resolution, as it consistently provides a playable experience.