Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 89 | 109 | 133 |
| 1440p QHD | 90 | 143 | 175 | 214 |
| 1080p Full HD | 125 | 201 | 245 | 299 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a remarkably consistent high-refresh-rate experience in Downfall, with the data showing that the CPU’s 95th percentile standing and the GPU’s 68th percentile position are more than sufficient for this horror title. Across the three tested resolutions, the combo clears the 60 FPS playability threshold in nearly every preset, with the only exception being Ultra settings at 4K, which dips to 56 FPS average. This pairing shows its strength at 1440p and 1080p, where it can handle even the most demanding settings with substantial headroom above the playable mark.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes, at 4K the combo is playable on High, Low, and Medium settings. High settings deliver an average of 89 FPS, Medium averages 109 FPS, and Low averages 133 FPS. Ultra settings fall below the 60 FPS threshold at 56 FPS average.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this hardware?
A: At 2560x1440, the best settings preset is Ultra, which maintains an average of 90 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available and still clears the 60 FPS playability threshold by 30 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 3080 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 3080’s average benchmark score of 23172 places it just 0.3% behind the NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon R9 M290X. These deltas are negligible, indicating near-identical synthetic performance.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the combo produces an average of 245 FPS, with a minimum of 208 FPS and a maximum of 282 FPS. This far exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold.
*Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck in this pairing for Downfall?*
A: The data suggests not; the i9-14900K sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 79097. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900KF by only 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus by 0.6%, while leading the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7%.
Q: What 4K settings should I avoid with this configuration?
A: Avoid Ultra settings at 3840x2160, as the average FPS drops to 56, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. High settings at 4K provide 89 FPS average and are the recommended maximum for that resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Intel Core i9-14900K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 shifts predictably as resolution increases, but the CPU’s dominance in this pairing means it rarely limits frame delivery. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the primary constraint, yet the data shows the combo still achieves 299 FPS on Low settings and 125 FPS on Ultra, indicating that even at lower resolutions where CPU load is typically higher, the i9-14900K’s 24 cores and 32 threads are not a limiting factor. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a typical GPU-bound pattern: Ultra settings drop from 125 FPS to 90 FPS, a 28% reduction, while Low settings fall from 299 FPS to 214 FPS, a 28% decrease as well. This proportional scaling across presets suggests that the RTX 3080 is the active component determining frame rates, with the CPU having ample headroom.
Moving from 1440p to 4K, the GPU’s role becomes even more pronounced. Ultra settings at 2560x1440 average 90 FPS, but at 3840x2160 this collapses to 56 FPS, a 38% drop that reflects the dramatic increase in pixel count and the RTX 3080’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory being pushed harder. Conversely, Low settings at 4K still average 133 FPS, indicating that when the GPU load is lightened, the system easily handles the resolution. The CPU’s contribution is best illustrated by the fact that at 4K High settings, the combo produces 89 FPS, which is only 1 FPS less than the 1440p Ultra result of 90 FPS; this suggests that at higher resolutions, the CPU is not the bottleneck, and the RTX 3080’s raw throughput—measured at 29.77 TFLOPS FP32—is the deciding factor. For this horror game, the data indicates that the GPU governs performance at all resolutions, with the CPU providing consistent support without ever becoming the limiting component.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific configuration of Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 1057 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places the pairing in the upper third of all systems tested, which is a strong result given that the GPU alone sits in only the 68th percentile of all graphics cards. The rank is likely buoyed by the CPU’s superior 95th percentile standing, which compensates for the RTX 3080’s mid-tier position relative to newer hardware. The gap between the combo’s rank and the GPU’s percentile suggests that the i9-14900K’s high synthetic scores—such as 39399.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 21697 in Geekbench multi-core—help the system punch above its GPU weight in this title.
Compared to the GPU’s nearest rivals, which include the NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon RX 6600M, the RTX 3080’s synthetic scores are nearly identical, with deltas under 0.5%. However, the combo rank of 1057 out of 3716 indicates that in real-world Downfall testing, this system outperforms the majority of configurations, likely due to the CPU’s exceptional single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. The rank also reflects that many of the 3716 combos likely pair weaker CPUs with similar GPUs, and the i9-14900K’s 6.00 GHz boost clock and high cache hierarchy provide a distinct advantage in maintaining frame pacing. For a game released in 2016, this modern CPU and GPU combination is overqualified, and the rank confirms that users can expect top-tier performance relative to the broader database.
The Verdict
The benchmark data unequivocally shows that this PC can run Downfall with excellent performance across all tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the verdict lists High, Low, and Medium as playable settings, with High being the best at 89 FPS average. This is a strong result for 4K gaming, and the fact that Medium also clears the threshold at 109 FPS provides flexibility for users who prefer smoother motion. Ultra at 4K is not playable, falling to 56 FPS, which is 4 FPS below the 60 FPS playability threshold.
At 2560x1440, all four settings presets are playable, with Ultra being the best at 90 FPS average. This means users can max out the game’s visual quality while maintaining a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The 1920x1080 resolution is where this combo truly excels, with Ultra settings hitting 125 FPS average, more than double the playability threshold. Low settings at 1080p reach 299 FPS, which is near the limit of most high-refresh monitors. For a horror game where smooth frame delivery is critical to atmosphere, this system provides a definitive yes: it runs Downfall flawlessly at 1080p and 1440p on the highest presets, and at 4K with high settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160, the combo starts at 56 FPS on Ultra, which is the only sub-60 result in the entire dataset. High settings at 4K jump to 89 FPS, Medium reaches 109 FPS with a minimum of 92 and maximum of 125, and Low tops out at 133 FPS. The gap between Ultra and High at 4K is substantial at 33 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset introduces a significant rendering cost that the RTX 3080 cannot sustain at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the results are consistently above 90 FPS. Low settings produce 214 FPS, High averages 143 FPS, and Medium delivers 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 and maximum of 201. Ultra at 1440p averages 90 FPS, which is exactly the same as the best 4K setting, illustrating the scaling efficiency of this GPU when resolution drops. At 1920x1080, the performance is exceptional across the board: Low hits 299 FPS, High averages 201 FPS, Medium reaches 245 FPS with a minimum of 208 and maximum of 282, and Ultra still delivers 125 FPS. The 1080p results show that this combo is capable of driving high-refresh displays even at the most demanding preset.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the best settings preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 89 FPS. This is the recommended choice for 4K gaming, as it provides a solid balance between visual fidelity and frame rate. Medium is also viable at 109 FPS, but High offers better image quality with only a 20 FPS penalty. Low settings at 133 FPS are available for users prioritizing maximum smoothness, but High is the optimal choice for most players.
At 2560x1440, the best settings preset is Ultra, achieving 90 FPS average. This is the highest preset available and still clears the 60 FPS threshold by 30 FPS, making it the clear recommendation for 1440p displays. The data shows no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution, as even the most demanding settings maintain a comfortable margin. For 1920x1080, Ultra is also the best settings preset, with an average of 125 FPS. This provides more than double the playability threshold and ensures that even in the most intense horror sequences, frame rates remain smooth. The 1080p Ultra result also demonstrates that this combo has significant headroom, meaning users could potentially enable additional visual enhancements beyond the preset if the game allows, though the data only accounts for the tested presets.