Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 55 | 67 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 88 | 108 | 132 |
| 1080p Full HD | 77 | 124 | 151 | 185 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a performance profile that is heavily dependent on resolution and quality preset in Downfall. At 1920x1080, the combination is overwhelmingly capable, posting an average of 185 FPS at Low settings and 77 FPS at Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong, with High settings producing an 88 FPS average. At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits, with only Low and Medium settings maintaining average frame rates above the 60 FPS playability threshold, while Ultra drops to 34 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rate data for this combination in Downfall covers three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low settings yield an average of 185 FPS, Medium produces 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 174 FPS, High achieves 124 FPS, and Ultra settles at 77 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 108 FPS, indicating that the GPU has substantial headroom even at the highest settings.
At 2560x1440, the average frame rates scale down predictably. Low settings deliver 132 FPS, Medium produces 108 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 124 FPS, High reaches 88 FPS, and Ultra drops to 55 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 77 FPS, which is narrower than at 1080p, suggesting that the higher resolution begins to constrain the GPU’s ability to maintain extreme frame rates at Ultra settings.
At 3840x2160, the performance envelope tightens considerably. Low settings produce an average of 82 FPS, Medium yields 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS and a maximum of 77 FPS, High falls to 55 FPS, and Ultra drops to 34 FPS. Notably, the Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum frame rate of 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold even though the average is above it, indicating occasional dips that could be perceptible in gameplay. The Ultra preset at this resolution is essentially unplayable by the 60 FPS standard, with an average that is nearly half the required threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
Analysis of the frame rate scaling between resolutions and presets clarifies the division of labor between the Intel Core i7-14700K and the Intel Arc B580 in Downfall. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is substantial — 108 FPS — which indicates that the GPU is the primary performance driver. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, has ample headroom to feed the GPU at this resolution, as evidenced by the 185 FPS average at Low settings.
When moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average frame rates at each preset drop by roughly 28-30%, which is consistent with the increased pixel count. This scaling pattern suggests that the GPU remains the bottleneck, as the CPU’s performance does not degrade with resolution. The fact that Ultra at 1440p drops to 55 FPS while High remains at 88 FPS indicates that the Arc B580’s rendering capabilities, rather than CPU throughput, are the limiting factor at higher quality settings.
At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more aggressive. The difference between Low (82 FPS) and Medium (67 FPS) is only 15 FPS, while the drop from High (55 FPS) to Ultra (34 FPS) is 21 FPS. This non-linear progression points to the GPU’s memory bandwidth and shading resources being saturated at 4K, particularly with the Ultra preset’s increased demand on the 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus. The CPU’s role at 4K is diminished further, as even the Low preset cannot push frame rates above 82 FPS, confirming that the Arc B580 is the definitive bottleneck at this resolution. Benchmark results indicate that the i7-14700K is never the limiting factor in this configuration, with the GPU governing performance across all tested scenarios.
FAQ
Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 77 FPS, which is 17 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold. This preset is listed as playable in the verdict data, with an average of 77 FPS.
Q: What is the highest playable preset at 2560x1440?
A: High settings are the most demanding preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, producing 88 FPS. Ultra settings at this resolution drop to 55 FPS, which fails to meet the playability threshold.
*Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware in Downfall?*
A: Partially. At 3840x2160, Low settings (82 FPS) and Medium settings (67 FPS) are playable. However, the Medium preset has a minimum frame rate of 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting intermittent stutters. High and Ultra presets are not playable, with averages of 55 FPS and 34 FPS respectively.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 2080, in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 has an average score of 22895. This puts the Arc B580 0.6% ahead of the RTX 2080 in aggregate benchmark performance.
Q: What is the performance difference between the i7-14700K and the Ryzen 9 7950X in CPU benchmarks?
A: The Intel Core i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515. The i7-14700K trails the Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.2% in average CPU benchmark score, making them effectively equivalent in synthetic tests.
Q: Does the 4K Medium preset ever drop below 60 FPS?
A: Yes. The minimum frame rate for 3840x2160 Medium settings is 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playability threshold. While the average of 67 FPS is playable, the minimum indicates that frame times are not consistently stable.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i7-14700K with the Intel Arc B580 can run Downfall across all three tested resolutions, but the playable settings vary significantly. At 1920x1080, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold at every preset, with Ultra settings delivering a 77 FPS average. This is the only resolution where the maximum quality preset is fully playable.
At 2560x1440, the verdict data lists High, Low, and Medium as playable settings. The best settings are High, producing an average of 88 FPS. Ultra at this resolution falls short at 55 FPS, missing the 60 FPS target by a margin of 5 FPS.
At 3840x2160, only Low and Medium are playable. The best settings are Medium, with an average of 67 FPS. However, the minimum frame rate of 57 FPS at this preset is a concern, as it dips below the threshold. High and Ultra are not playable, with averages of 55 FPS and 34 FPS respectively. For users prioritizing 4K, the data suggests that Medium is the ceiling, and even then, frame pacing may not be perfectly smooth.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the Intel Core i7-14700K, the nearest CPU rivals in benchmark performance are the AMD EPYC 9115, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. The i7-14700K scores 69355 on average, which is 0.1% above the EPYC 9115’s 69288 and 0.2% below the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 69515. The Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875, putting it 0.7% ahead, and the Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996, 0.9% ahead. In gaming workloads, these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Downfall, as the gap in synthetic benchmarks is negligible and the game is GPU-bound at most settings.
For the Intel Arc B580, the nearest GPU rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, and NVIDIA P106-100. The Arc B580’s average benchmark score of 23021 is 0.2% below the RX 580 2048SP’s 23061, 0.6% above the RTX 2080’s 22895, 0.7% below the RTX 3080’s 23172, and 1% below the P106-100’s 23249. In practical terms, any of these GPUs would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the Arc B580 in Downfall. Users with an RTX 3080 should expect nearly identical performance, while those with a P106-100 would see a marginal improvement of about 1% in average FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 77 FPS. This is the recommended setting for full visual quality at this resolution, with no playability concerns.
At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is High, delivering 88 FPS. Ultra is not viable here, so High provides the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS on average is Medium, with an average of 67 FPS. However, the minimum frame rate of 57 FPS means that the experience may not be consistently smooth. Users who prioritize frame time stability over visual quality may prefer Low settings, which produce an average of 82 FPS with no reported minimum below the threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested hardware combinations for Downfall, the Intel Core i7-14700K and Intel Arc B580 configuration ranks 2802 out of 3716 total combos. This places it in the 75th percentile of all tested systems, meaning roughly 75% of tested combinations deliver higher average frame rates. The ranking reflects the Arc B580’s position as a mid-tier GPU — it outperforms the 32% of GPUs below it in the percentile ranking but is outpaced by the majority of higher-end cards. The i7-14700K, by contrast, ranks in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that the processor is not the limiting factor in this pairing. The combo’s rank is thus a direct consequence of the GPU’s performance class, and users seeking higher rankings would need to pair the i7-14700K with a more powerful graphics card.