Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

97%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
397 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
168 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
285 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
121 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
175 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
76 FPS
3.7ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 76 117 142 175
1440p QHD 121 189 231 285
1080p Full HD 168 268 326 397

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 268
1920x1080 Low 397
1920x1080 Medium 326
1920x1080 Ultra 168
2560x1440 High 189
2560x1440 Low 285
2560x1440 Medium 231
2560x1440 Ultra 121
3840x2160 High 117
3840x2160 Low 175
3840x2160 Medium 142
3840x2160 Ultra 76

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers exceptional performance in Downfall, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold across every tested resolution and settings combination. The data shows a system that is not merely playable but overwhelmingly overqualified for this horror title, with average FPS figures ranging from a low of 75.9 FPS at 4K Ultra to a high of 396.6 FPS at 1080p Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the benchmark results show a clear progression in frame rates as settings are reduced. The Ultra preset produces an average of 75.9 FPS, which comfortably clears the 60 FPS playable threshold while delivering maximum visual fidelity. Dropping to High settings increases performance to 117 FPS, a substantial 54% improvement over Ultra. Medium settings yield 142.2 FPS, and Low settings reach 174.7 FPS. The scaling between Ultra and Low at 4K represents a 130% performance uplift, demonstrating that the RTX 4080 SUPER has significant headroom even at the most demanding resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates climb substantially. Ultra settings deliver 120.6 FPS, more than double the 4K Ultra result and exactly double the 60 FPS threshold. High settings reach 188.9 FPS, Medium hits 231 FPS, and Low achieves 284.6 FPS. The gap between Ultra and High at 1440p is 68.3 FPS, which is a larger absolute difference than the 41.1 FPS gap seen at 4K between the same two presets. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU begins to play a more significant role, though the GPU remains the primary bottleneck in most scenarios.

At 1920x1080, the system produces extraordinary frame rates that approach or exceed the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. The Ultra preset averages 167.9 FPS, which is already far beyond what most displays can show. High settings reach 268.3 FPS, Medium hits 326.1 FPS, and Low peaks at 396.6 FPS. The progression from Ultra to Low at 1080p represents a 136% performance increase, closely mirroring the scaling observed at 4K. Notably, the difference between 1440p and 1080p at the same settings is substantial: Ultra improves from 120.6 FPS to 167.9 FPS, a 39% gain, while Low improves from 284.6 FPS to 396.6 FPS, a 39% gain as well.

The min and max FPS values are not provided in the data, so the analysis relies entirely on average frame rates. This is a limitation, as frame time consistency and 1% lows are critical in horror games where sudden spikes in action can cause stutters. However, the extremely high average FPS figures suggest that even if minimum frame rates were significantly lower, they would likely remain above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this CPU-GPU pairing in Downfall is 298 out of 3716 tested combinations. This places it in the top 8% of all systems tested, which is a strong showing for a configuration featuring a 12th-generation Intel processor and an RTX 4080 SUPER. The percentile ranking for the CPU alone is 85, meaning the i7-12700KF outperforms 85% of all CPUs in the benchmark database. Similarly, the GPU percentile is 86, indicating the RTX 4080 SUPER is faster than 86% of all GPUs tested.

The combination of a top-15% CPU and top-14% GPU results in a system that ranks in the top 8% of combos, suggesting that the pairing is well-balanced and that neither component is significantly bottlenecking the other in this particular game. The rank of 298 out of 3716 means there are 297 tested combinations that perform better, but the vast majority of systems — over 3,400 — are slower. For a horror game like Downfall, which likely does not require extreme hardware, this combo is far more powerful than necessary for a smooth experience.

It is notably the combo rank is specific to Downfall and may not translate directly to other games. The game's engine, optimization level, and graphical demands all influence how a given CPU-GPU pair performs. In this case, the data indicates that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the dominant factor in determining frame rates, as evidenced by the significant performance drops when moving to higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K Ultra settings above 60 FPS?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 75.9 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate this combo achieves in Downfall?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 396.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1080p compared to 4K at the same settings?

A: At Ultra settings, 1080p delivers 167.9 FPS versus 75.9 FPS at 4K, which is 121% faster. At Low settings, 1080p delivers 396.6 FPS versus 174.7 FPS at 4K, a 127% improvement.

Q: Which component is more important for this game at 4K?

A: The data shows that frame rates drop significantly from 1440p to 4K at the same settings, indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The RTX 4080 SUPER's performance scales with resolution, while the CPU's role diminishes.

Q: Does this combo rank in the top 10% of all tested systems for Downfall?

A: Yes. The combo ranks 298 out of 3716, which places it in the top 8% of all tested combinations.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at all three tested resolutions?

A: Yes. Ultra settings produce 75.9 FPS at 4K, 120.6 FPS at 1440p, and 167.9 FPS at 1080p, all above the 60 FPS threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-13700T scores an average benchmark of 35403, which is 0.1% lower than the i7-12700KF's 35365. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a 0.2% difference, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, also a 0.2% difference. These processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Downfall, meaning the choice between them would have minimal impact on frame rates in this game.

For the GPU, the closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which scores 54247 versus the RTX 4080 SUPER's 54209, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a 2.7% difference. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a 2.8% difference. These GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Downfall, though the AMD cards' higher benchmark scores suggest they might offer marginally better performance in some scenarios.

In practical terms, users with an RTX 4080 (non-SUPER) would see nearly identical results, with a 0.1% difference being imperceptible in real-world gameplay. The AMD alternatives, despite having higher average benchmark scores, would likely perform within a few percentage points of the RTX 4080 SUPER in Downfall. Given that the RTX 4080 SUPER already delivers 75.9 FPS at 4K Ultra, any of these alternatives would also clear the 60 FPS threshold at all resolutions and presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 75.9 FPS. This is the recommended setting for users who prioritize visual quality and have a 4K display. The 15.9 FPS margin above the threshold provides some headroom for demanding scenes, though users concerned about frame time consistency might prefer High settings at 117 FPS for a larger safety margin.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is also the best choice, producing 120.6 FPS. This is exactly double the 60 FPS threshold, providing significant headroom. Users with high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors (144Hz or higher) would still benefit from High settings at 188.9 FPS, but Ultra remains the best balance of quality and performance for most users.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver 167.9 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and also exceeds the refresh rate of most 1080p monitors (typically 60Hz or 144Hz). The Ultra preset is the recommended choice here, as it provides the best visual quality while still delivering frame rates that exceed common display refresh rates. Users with 240Hz or higher monitors could consider High settings at 268.3 FPS, but this comes at the cost of reduced graphical fidelity.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: this PC can run Downfall at or above 60 FPS at every resolution and preset combination tested. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average FPS of 75.9 at 4K, 120.6 at 1440p, and 167.9 at 1080p.

The 4K Ultra result of 75.9 FPS is particularly noteworthy, as it demonstrates that this combo can handle maximum graphical settings at the most demanding resolution while maintaining a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The 1440p and 1080p results are so far above the threshold that they invite the question of whether the game's engine has an internal frame rate cap or whether the hardware is simply overkill for this title. In any case, users can confidently enable Ultra settings at any resolution without worrying about performance issues.

The only caveat is the absence of min and max FPS data, which means the analysis cannot account for frame time spikes or stutters. However, given the high average FPS figures, even a significant drop in minimum frame rates would likely keep the experience smooth. For a horror game like Downfall, where immersion is key, this level of performance ensures that the gameplay remains fluid and responsive.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals which component dominates performance in Downfall. At 4K Ultra, the system produces 75.9 FPS, while at 1440p Ultra it produces 120.6 FPS — a 59% increase. At 1080p Ultra, the frame rate rises to 167.9 FPS, another 39% increase. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the RTX 4080 SUPER's workload increases significantly with pixel count.

At lower resolutions, the CPU's role becomes more prominent, though the data suggests it remains secondary. The difference between 1440p and 1080p at the same settings is roughly 39%, which is slightly less than the 59% difference between 4K and 1440p. This diminishing scaling as resolution decreases suggests that the i7-12700KF is beginning to limit performance at 1080p, but it is not a severe bottleneck — the CPU still allows frame rates above 160 FPS at Ultra settings.

The preset scaling within a given resolution also provides insight. At 4K, the difference between Ultra and Low is 98.8 FPS (from 75.9 to 174.7), while at 1080p the difference is 228.7 FPS (from 167.9 to 396.6). The larger absolute difference at 1080p indicates that the GPU has more headroom at lower resolutions, and the CPU becomes a more significant factor in determining frame rates. However, the i7-12700KF's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance — as shown by its 3DMark scores of 1043 single-thread and 9983 max-threads — ensures it keeps pace with the RTX 4080 SUPER even at 1080p.

In summary, the GPU is the dominant component for Downfall at 4K and 1440p, while the CPU plays a larger but still secondary role at 1080p. For users considering upgrades, the data suggests that improving the GPU would yield the largest frame rate gains at higher resolutions, while a CPU upgrade would provide diminishing returns given the already high performance of the i7-12700KF.