Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

73%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
174 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
74 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
124 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
51 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
75 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
35 FPS
8.5ms Frame Time
13ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 15,290

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 53 64 75
1440p QHD 51 83 105 124
1080p Full HD 74 117 143 174

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 117
1920x1080 Low 174
1920x1080 Medium 143
1920x1080 Ultra 74
2560x1440 High 83
2560x1440 Low 124
2560x1440 Medium 105
2560x1440 Ultra 51
3840x2160 High 53
3840x2160 Low 75
3840x2160 Medium 64
3840x2160 Ultra 35

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 presents a compelling dataset for evaluating performance in the horror title Downfall. The recorded measurements show a system that is highly capable at standard resolutions, yet it encounters predictable limitations when pushed to 4K. The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions and four quality presets, with the average frame rates revealing where this combination of a 12th Gen Intel processor and a Turing-architecture GPU excels and where it falls short of the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination demonstrates its strongest performance, with all presets clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Low preset delivers an average of 173.7 FPS, while the Medium preset reaches 143.2 FPS. High settings produce an average of 117.3 FPS, and even the maximum Ultra preset maintains a solid 73.5 FPS. This data suggests that at 1080p, the RTX 2060 has ample headroom, making the Ultra preset a viable option for users seeking maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smooth gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains robust but begins to show the strain of increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 123.9 FPS, and Medium settings follow at 105.1 FPS. High settings still comfortably exceed the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 82.7 FPS. However, the Ultra preset drops to an average of 50.8 FPS, which falls below the playable threshold. This marks the first instance in the dataset where the hardware cannot maintain 60 FPS at the highest quality level.

At 3840x2160, the limitations of the RTX 2060 become pronounced. The Low preset averages 74.6 FPS, which remains playable, and the Medium preset averages 63.5 FPS, just clearing the threshold. High settings, however, yield an average of 52.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard. The Ultra preset produces an average of 34.5 FPS, a significant drop that indicates the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K resolution. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep, particularly for the Ultra preset, which loses 16.3 FPS, while the High preset loses 30 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-12700KF provide context for its processing power. The Intel Core i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35403, which is 0.1% higher than the i7-12700KF's score of 35365. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, a 0.2% advantage. Conversely, the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, which is 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, also 0.2% lower. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the i7-12700KF sits in a tightly contested performance band where users would not experience meaningful differences in CPU-bound scenarios.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, the nearest rivals show a similar clustering. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 has an average score of 15283, effectively identical to the RTX 2060's 15290. The AMD Radeon 680M scores 15270, a 0.1% difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171, which is 0.8% lower than the RTX 2060. This data suggests that the RTX 2060 performs on par with much older hardware like the GTX 580 in this benchmark, which is surprising given the architectural generational gap, while also being competitive with newer entry-level cards.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Downfall, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ranks 2925 out of 3716 recorded configurations. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, at approximately the 78th percentile, meaning roughly 79% of tested combos perform better in this game. The ranking suggests that while the CPU is a strong performer, ranking in the 85th percentile against all CPUs, the GPU's 58th percentile standing against all GPUs drags the overall combo down. The data implies that the RTX 2060 is the limiting factor in this pairing, as the CPU has significant headroom that the GPU cannot fully utilize in this title.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, this PC can run Downfall at 60 FPS or above in several configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with the Ultra preset achieving an average of 73.5 FPS, making it the best choice for 1080p. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding playable option, delivering an average of 82.7 FPS; Ultra falls short at 50.8 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest quality setting that maintains playability, averaging 63.5 FPS, while Low also clears the threshold at 74.6 FPS. High and Ultra at 4K are not recommended, as they fall to 52.7 FPS and 34.5 FPS respectively.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals distinct roles for the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the primary determinant of performance, as evidenced by the large frame rate differences between presets. The jump from Low at 173.7 FPS to Ultra at 73.5 FPS represents a 100.2 FPS swing, which is a GPU-bound characteristic. The CPU, with its high benchmark scores, is more than capable of feeding the GPU at this resolution. At 2560x1440, the scaling between presets narrows slightly, with Low at 123.9 FPS and Ultra at 50.8 FPS, a 73.1 FPS difference, again indicating GPU dominance. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes even more stressed, with Low at 74.6 FPS and Ultra at 34.5 FPS, a 40.1 FPS difference. The CPU's role remains constant across resolutions, as its performance is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking even at 1080p Low, where frame rates are highest.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 73.5 FPS. This provides the best visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay. For 2560x1440, the High preset is the optimal choice, averaging 82.7 FPS, which offers a balance of visual fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls below the threshold and should be avoided. For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest playable setting, averaging 63.5 FPS. While Low is also playable at 74.6 FPS, Medium offers better visual quality without dropping below 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1920x1080?

A: The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 73.5 FPS, making it the most demanding playable setting at this resolution.

*Q: Can this system run Downfall at 4K with High settings?*

A: No, the High preset at 3840x2160 averages 52.7 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The Medium preset is the highest playable setting at 4K, averaging 63.5 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 compare to its closest rival, the GTX 580?

A: The RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 15290, while the GTX 580 scores 15283, a delta of 0%, meaning their performance is effectively identical in this benchmark.

Q: Which component is more critical for performance at 2560x1440?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor at 2560x1440, as shown by the 73.1 FPS difference between Low and Ultra presets. The CPU's performance is sufficient to avoid being a bottleneck at this resolution.

*Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems in Downfall?*

A: This combination ranks 2925 out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the lower half of the database.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at any resolution?

A: Yes, at 1920x1080 the Ultra preset averages 73.5 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the Ultra preset falls below 60 FPS.