Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 74 | 119 | 145 | 178 |
| 1440p QHD | 120 | 191 | 233 | 285 |
| 1080p Full HD | 168 | 268 | 327 | 400 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The data shows that the Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a decisive performance outcome in Downfall: every tested resolution and preset combination clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, with headroom that ranges from comfortable at 4K Ultra to overwhelming at 1080p Low. This combination ranks at 230 out of 3,716 tested combos, placing it in the top percentile of systems evaluated for this title.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 230 out of 3,716 places this CPU-GPU pairing in the upper tier of all tested systems for Downfall. This is not a borderline configuration; the rank reflects a setup that handles the game's demands with substantial margin. To contextualize, the CPU sits at the 84th percentile against all tested CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile against all tested GPUs. Both components are individually strong, and their pairing produces a system that is greater than the sum of its parts in this specific title.
The ranking suggests that most of the 3,716 tested combos fall below this configuration's performance envelope. When considering the measured FPS data, the lowest average frame rate recorded across all settings and resolutions is 74 FPS at 4K Ultra. That figure alone demonstrates why this combo ranks so high: there is no scenario in the test matrix where the system dips near the 60 FPS threshold. The rank is further validated by the fact that the 4K Ultra setting, which is the most demanding configuration tested, still produces a 74 FPS average, leaving a 14 FPS margin above the playability threshold.
CPU and GPU Roles
In Downfall, the GPU dominates performance scaling at every resolution, but the degree of CPU involvement becomes apparent when comparing the lowest and highest settings at each resolution. The data shows a consistent pattern: moving from Low to Ultra settings produces a larger FPS drop at lower resolutions, which indicates that the CPU has more headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p than at 4K.
At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (400 FPS) and Ultra (168 FPS) is 232 FPS, a 58% reduction. At 2560x1440, the gap between Low (285 FPS) and Ultra (120 FPS) is 165 FPS, a 42% reduction. At 3840x2160, the gap between Low (178 FPS) and Ultra (74 FPS) is 104 FPS, a 42% reduction. These figures indicate that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, but the CPU still matters: the i7-12700K's 12 cores and 20 threads provide enough throughput to sustain high frame rates at 1080p, where the GPU has spare capacity.
The scaling between resolutions at the same settings reinforces this interpretation. At Ultra settings, going from 1080p (168 FPS) to 1440p (120 FPS) is a 29% drop, and from 1440p to 4K (74 FPS) is a 38% drop. At Low settings, the corresponding drops are 29% (400 to 285 FPS) and 38% (285 to 178 FPS). The consistency of these percentage drops across settings suggests that the CPU maintains a stable performance floor, while the GPU's rendering load scales predictably with resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture across three resolutions and four settings tiers. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 400 FPS on Low, 327 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 278 and maximum of 376), 268 FPS on High, and 168 FPS on Ultra. These numbers indicate that even at the highest 1080p setting, the system has over 100 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 2560x1440, the averages are 285 FPS on Low, 233 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 198 and maximum of 268), 191 FPS on High, and 120 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset's minimum of 198 FPS is notable because it confirms that frame pacing remains stable even during demanding scenes, with no dips approaching the playability threshold.
At 3840x2160, the averages are 178 FPS on Low, 145 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 123 and maximum of 167), 119 FPS on High, and 74 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra average of 74 FPS is the lowest figure in the entire dataset, but it still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by 23%. The Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum of 123 FPS, which is higher than the average of High at the same resolution, indicating that the Medium preset provides a particularly stable experience.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Downfall at 4K with all settings maxed out?*
A: Yes. The 3840x2160 Ultra preset produces an average of 74 FPS, which is 14 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best setting for 1440p if I want maximum visual quality?
A: The 2560x1440 Ultra preset delivers an average of 120 FPS, making it the best visual option that remains well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How much performance headroom exists at 1080p?
A: Even at the most demanding 1080p setting (Ultra), the system averages 168 FPS, which is 108 FPS above the playable threshold. At Low settings, the average reaches 400 FPS.
Q: Does the frame rate drop significantly when moving from Medium to Ultra at 4K?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 145 FPS while Ultra averages 74 FPS, a 49% reduction. However, both remain playable.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in any tested configuration?
A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 123 FPS, which occurs at 4K Medium settings. No tested configuration dips below 123 FPS at any point.
*Q: Is this system more CPU-limited or GPU-limited in Downfall?*
A: The data indicates GPU limitation at higher resolutions, as the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is consistent across settings. The CPU's 12-core, 20-thread configuration prevents it from becoming a bottleneck at any tested resolution.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 168 FPS. This leaves a buffer of 108 FPS above the threshold, making it the recommended choice for maximum quality at this resolution.
For 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best setting, delivering an average of 120 FPS. This is exactly double the playable threshold, providing substantial headroom for demanding scenes.
For 3840x2160, Ultra again qualifies as the best setting, with an average of 74 FPS. While this is the lowest average in the dataset, it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by 14 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience.
The Verdict
This PC can run Downfall at every tested resolution and preset combination, with no configuration falling below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict by resolution confirms this: at 3840x2160, all four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with Ultra providing 74 FPS. At 2560x1440, all settings are playable, with Ultra providing 120 FPS. At 1920x1080, all settings are playable, with Ultra providing 168 FPS.
The system's weakest performance point is 4K Ultra at 74 FPS, but even this is comfortably above the threshold. The strongest performance point is 1080p Low at 400 FPS, which is over six times the playable threshold. For any user aiming to play Downfall at maximum settings, the 4K Ultra experience at 74 FPS is the baseline, and every other configuration offers more headroom.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-12700KF performs within 0.2% of the i7-12700K's average benchmark score, making it a functionally identical alternative for Downfall. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 0.1% lower, the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 0.3% lower, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 0.4% lower. All four rivals sit within a narrow band of the i7-12700K's performance, meaning that swapping to any of these CPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in this game.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match, with an average benchmark score 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% lower, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% lower. The RTX 4080 SUPER would deliver essentially identical FPS in Downfall, while the AMD alternatives would show small but measurable reductions in frame rates, likely keeping them above the 60 FPS threshold at most settings given the large headroom demonstrated by the RTX 4080.
For users seeking a system that behaves similarly, pairing the i7-12700K with an RTX 4080 SUPER would be the closest match, as both components are within 0.2% of their respective counterparts. The i7-12700KF with the RTX 4080 would also be a near-identical configuration, given the CPU's negligible performance delta. Any of these combinations would preserve the ability to run Downfall at 4K Ultra above 60 FPS.