Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 57 | 92 | 114 | 137 |
| 1440p QHD | 95 | 150 | 180 | 226 |
| 1080p Full HD | 129 | 210 | 253 | 315 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a dominant performance profile in Downfall, a 2016 horror title that is far more demanding on frame rates than its release date suggests. The measured data shows this combo crushing 60 FPS at nearly every setting, with only a single exception at the highest 4K Ultra preset. The 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake CPU (boost clock 5.00 GHz, 25 MB L3 cache) and the Ada Lovelace GPU (12 GB GDDR6X, 504.2 GB/s bandwidth) combine to produce headroom that makes this build a straightforward recommendation for high-refresh gaming, even at demanding resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark data for this combination is remarkably consistent, with no reported minimum or maximum frame times, only averages. At 1920x1080, the results are exceptional across every preset. The Low preset delivers 314.7 FPS average, Medium produces 253.2 FPS, High reaches 210 FPS, and even the most demanding Ultra setting holds 129.4 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the RTX 4070 is rarely the bottleneck; the CPU’s single-thread score of 1043 in 3DMark and passmark single-thread score of 4013 suggest ample headroom for the horror title’s logic and AI. The delta between Low and Ultra is 185.3 FPS, showing that the GPU’s shading units (5888) and texture units (184) scale performance predictably with the graphics load.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain extremely high. Low averages 225.6 FPS, Medium 180.3 FPS, High 149.5 FPS, and Ultra 94.6 FPS. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 28-30% across presets, which aligns with the increase in pixel count (from 2.07 million to 3.68 million pixels). Notably, the Ultra preset at 1440p still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, sitting 34.6 FPS above the playable mark. This resolution shows the GPU’s memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s) and pixel rate (158.4 GPixel/s) handling the higher fill-rate demand without collapsing frame times.
At 3840x2160, the story changes slightly. The Low preset averages 137.2 FPS, Medium 113.8 FPS, and High 91.8 FPS. These are all comfortably above 60 FPS. However, the Ultra preset drops to 57.3 FPS, which is 2.7 FPS below the playable threshold. This is the sole configuration where this combo fails to maintain 60 FPS. The 4K Ultra result suggests that the RTX 4070’s 12 GB frame buffer and 192-bit memory bus are reaching their practical limits with maxed-out textures and effects. The data shows a steep drop-off from High (91.8) to Ultra (57.3), a 34.5 FPS decline, indicating that the Ultra preset at 4K introduces rendering features (likely ray tracing or extreme shadow quality) that the Ada Lovelace chip handles with difficulty. The average score across all settings at 4K is 100 FPS, but the variance is significant.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearestRivals data for the CPU, the Intel Core i7-12700K (avg benchmark score 35287) is essentially performance-identical to three other processors. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, which is a delta of -0.1% — effectively a tie. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 (-0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 (-0.3%). The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 (-0.4%). In practical terms for Downfall, swapping the 12700K for any of these would yield imperceptible FPS differences, as the game’s frame rates above 200 FPS at lower resolutions are unlikely to be CPU-limited. The 12700K’s 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it sits in the top sixth of processors, but its nearest rivals show that the specific generation and clock speed matter little here.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (avg score 37648) has more varied rivals. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628 (+0.1% delta), which is a workstation card — despite the similar score, it would not offer the same gaming features (no DirectX 12 Ultimate support in the same way) and should be avoided for this title. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507 (+0.4% delta), an older architecture that would likely fall short in 4K Ultra given its lower memory bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135 (-1.3%), a laptop chip that would perform similarly but with higher power draw and thermal constraints. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157 (+1.3% delta), a professional card with limited gaming optimizations. For Downfall, only the RTX 4080 Mobile is a realistic alternative in a laptop form factor; the desktop RTX 4070 remains the better choice for sustained 4K performance.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system run Downfall at 4K with maximum settings?*
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 57.3, which is 2.7 FPS below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset at 4K delivers 91.8 FPS and is the highest playable setting.
Q: What is the best resolution to play at if I want the highest visual quality without dropping below 60 FPS?
A: The 2560x1440 resolution with the Ultra preset achieves 94.6 FPS average. This is the highest resolution and preset combination that both clears the 60 FPS threshold and uses the maximum settings.
Q: How much performance headroom is there at 1080p for high refresh rate monitors?
A: Substantial. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 314.7 FPS, Medium 253.2 FPS, and High 210 FPS. Even the Ultra preset at 129.4 FPS is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, making this combo ideal for 144Hz or 240Hz displays.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1440p?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at 2560x1440. The FPS drops from 225.6 (Low) to 94.6 (Ultra) show that increasing graphics settings heavily impacts the RTX 4070. The CPU’s 20 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock are sufficient, as evidenced by the 180.3 FPS at Medium.
Q: Does the RTX 4070’s 12 GB VRAM cause issues at any settings?
A: The benchmark results do not indicate VRAM-related stuttering or frame drops, as all settings except 4K Ultra maintain over 90 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the 57.3 FPS average may be due to VRAM capacity or bandwidth, but the data does not specify which.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: It ranks 941st out of 3716 total tested combinations, placing it in the top 25.3% of all systems tested for Downfall.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination holds a rank of 941 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the top quartile, which is notable given the game’s age. The rank reflects the GPU’s 81st percentile standing among all GPUs and the CPU’s 84th percentile. While the combo is not in the top 100, the measured FPS data shows that it outperforms many systems with higher raw benchmark scores due to the game’s specific optimization. The 941st rank out of 3716 means there are roughly 2775 combos that perform worse, but also 940 that perform better — likely systems with RTX 4080 or 4090-class GPUs. The rank is consistent with the 4K Ultra failure (57.3 FPS), as top-ranking combos would likely clear 60 FPS even at that extreme setting. For the vast majority of gaming scenarios, this rank is more than satisfactory, as the data shows the combo is in the upper echelon of playable performance.
The Verdict
This PC can run Downfall with confidence at every resolution except the absolute maximum. The verdict by resolution is clear: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best playable setting being High at 91.8 FPS average. At 2560x1440, all four settings — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable, with Ultra being the best at 94.6 FPS. At 1920x1080, all settings are playable, with Ultra at 129.4 FPS as the best. The only failure point is 4K Ultra at 57.3 FPS. For a 4K display, dropping from Ultra to High costs visual fidelity but gains 34.5 FPS, which is a worthwhile trade. For 1440p and 1080p users, this combo provides overwhelming performance headroom, making it a strong choice for high-refresh monitors.
Best Settings per Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K): The most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 91.8 FPS. Using Ultra drops to 57.3 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. Medium (113.8 FPS) and Low (137.2 FPS) are also playable but reduce visual quality unnecessarily.
- 2560x1440 (1440p): The most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 94.6 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting and still leaves 34.6 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS limit. High (149.5 FPS) and Medium (180.3 FPS) are also available if you prefer higher refresh rates.
- 1920x1080 (1080p): The most demanding preset is Ultra, with an average of 129.4 FPS. This is more than double the playable threshold, so there is no need to reduce settings. For competitive play, the Low preset at 314.7 FPS offers the highest possible frame rate, but Ultra provides the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.