Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

48%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
239 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
100 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
173 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
72 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
108 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
48 FPS
6.3ms Frame Time
9ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 2,254
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 26,331

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 70 86 108
1440p QHD 72 115 138 173
1080p Full HD 100 158 199 239

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 158
1920x1080 Low 239
1920x1080 Medium 199
1920x1080 Ultra 100
2560x1440 High 115
2560x1440 Low 173
2560x1440 Medium 138
2560x1440 Ultra 72
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Low 108
3840x2160 Medium 86
3840x2160 Ultra 48

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

The Intel Core i5-9400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a strong performance profile for Downfall, with the database showing a clear path to high frame rates across most resolution and settings combinations. The measured data indicates that this combination sits in the 48.5th percentile of all tested combos for this title, ranking 1803 out of 3716, a solidly mid-pack position that still leaves ample headroom for smooth gameplay.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU in this combo each have nearby hardware that would produce nearly identical results. For the processor, the Intel Core i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2254, placing it at the 47th percentile of all CPUs. The closest rival is the Intel Core i7-1068NG7, which scores 2259, a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the i7 is effectively a match. The Intel Core i3-10305 scores 2264, also within a hair of the i5-9400 at -0.4 percent delta. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246 (0.4 percent delta) and the Intel Core i7-10710U scores 2248 (0.3 percent delta). In practice, any of these four alternatives would deliver frame rates indistinguishable from the i5-9400 in a CPU-bound scenario.

For the GPU, the RTX 5060 posts an average benchmark score of 26331, sitting at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, a -0.3 percent delta, making it the closest performance peer. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 also lands at 26421 (-0.3 percent). The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (-0.8 percent), while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT comes in at 26011, a 1.2 percent delta in favor of the RTX 5060. These four cards would all produce very similar FPS in Downfall, with the RX 6750 XT being slightly slower and the RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary being slightly faster. Gamers upgrading from any of these GPUs should expect nearly identical performance, assuming the rest of the system stays constant.

FAQ

Q: Can the Intel Core i5-9400 bottleneck the RTX 5060 in Downfall?

A: The database shows the CPU ranks at the 47th percentile of all CPUs while the GPU ranks at the 72nd percentile, so the processor is the weaker link. However, the measured FPS data shows no obvious CPU ceiling, as the combo hits 239.1 FPS at 1080p Low, and every resolution and settings combination still clears the 60 FPS playable threshold except for 4K Ultra. The i5-9400's six cores and six threads are sufficient for this horror title.

Q: What is the most demanding setting that stays above 60 FPS at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, High settings are the most demanding preset that remains playable, producing an average of 70.1 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 47.5 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold, while Medium runs at 85.9 FPS and Low at 108 FPS.

Q: Is 1440p a good resolution for this combo?

A: Yes. The data shows 2560x1440 is fully playable across every preset. Ultra settings average 72.3 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold. High runs at 114.9 FPS, Medium at 137.8 FPS, and Low reaches 172.5 FPS. This makes 1440p the sweet spot where visual quality and frame rate balance cleanly.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rivals in raw GPU score?

A: The RTX 5060's average benchmark score is 26331. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2 percent slower, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8 percent faster. The AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550 are both 0.3 percent slower. None of these differences would be noticeable in real-world gameplay.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is exactly 100. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and provides a comfortable margin for dips during intense scenes. Lower settings push much higher, with Medium at 198.8 FPS, High at 158.4 FPS, and Low at 239.1 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 5060 require a large power supply?

A: The database lists a suggested PSU of 300 W for the GPU, with a TDP of 145 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. A standard mid-range power supply is sufficient, and the card uses a single 8-pin connector.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data covers three resolutions and four quality presets for each. At 1920x1080, the results are exceptionally strong. Low settings produce an average of 239.1 FPS, Medium runs at 198.8 FPS, High at 158.4 FPS, and Ultra at 100 FPS. Every setting at 1080p clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin, making this the resolution where the combo is most comfortable. The gap between Low and Ultra is 139.1 FPS, showing that the RTX 5060 has plenty of headroom even at the highest preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show more separation between presets. Low averages 172.5 FPS, Medium 137.8 FPS, High 114.9 FPS, and Ultra 72.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 100.2 FPS, and the Ultra result is the only one under 100 FPS, but it still clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This resolution offers a good balance for users who want higher detail without sacrificing smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the data shows the limits of this combination. Low settings average 108 FPS, Medium 85.9 FPS, and High 70.1 FPS. Ultra falls to 47.5 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 60.5 FPS, and the High preset is the most demanding option that remains playable. Users targeting 4K should stick with High or lower to stay above 60 FPS.

No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS. The consistent scaling from 1080p to 4K suggests the GPU is the primary driver of performance, with the CPU keeping up even at the highest frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific CPU and GPU combination at 1803 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. That places it in the 48.5th percentile, meaning roughly half of all tested systems perform better and half perform worse. This is a mid-pack result, which fits the profile of a six-core CPU from 2018 paired with a current-generation GPU. The GPU is clearly the stronger component, ranking at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 47th percentile among all CPUs. For a horror game like Downfall, which is not typically CPU-intensive, this imbalance does not create a problem in the measured data.

The rank of 1803 suggests that while the RTX 5060 is capable, the i5-9400 holds the combo back in some scenarios. Systems with newer CPUs and the same GPU would likely rank higher, but the measured FPS shows that this pairing still delivers playable performance at all resolutions except 4K Ultra. The 3716 total combos include both weaker and stronger hardware, and this result sits squarely in the middle, which is reasonable for a build that mixes an older mid-range CPU with a newer mid-range GPU.

The Verdict

This PC can run Downfall, and it can run it well at most settings. The verdict by resolution is clear. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra hitting 100 FPS and Low reaching 239.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra averaging 72.3 FPS. At 3840x2160, High, Medium, and Low are playable, but Ultra drops to 47.5 FPS, which fails the 60 FPS threshold.

The best playable setting at each resolution follows the recorded data. At 1080p, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra with 100 FPS. At 1440p, it is also Ultra with 72.3 FPS. At 4K, the most demanding preset is High with 70.1 FPS. For users who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity, dropping to Medium at 4K raises the average to 85.9 FPS, and Low reaches 108 FPS.

The CPU does not appear to be a limiting factor in the measured results. The i5-9400's six cores and six threads, with a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, are sufficient for this title. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle the texture loads without issue. Overall, this is a capable combo for Downfall, with the only compromise being 4K Ultra, which requires a more powerful GPU to maintain 60 FPS.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra. The measured average FPS is 100, which clears the 60 FPS threshold by 40 FPS. This preset provides maximum visual quality while still delivering a smooth experience. Users who want even higher frame rates can drop to High for 158.4 FPS or Medium for 198.8 FPS, but Ultra is the most demanding option that remains fully playable.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra. The average FPS at this preset is 72.3, which is 12.3 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. This gives a comfortable margin for scene-to-scene variation. High runs at 114.9 FPS, Medium at 137.8 FPS, and Low at 172.5 FPS, but Ultra offers the best balance of detail and performance at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the best setting is High. The average FPS is 70.1, which is 10.1 FPS above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium runs at 85.9 FPS and Low at 108 FPS, but High delivers the highest visual quality while staying playable. Ultra is not recommended at 4K, as the 47.5 FPS average falls below the playable threshold and would likely feel stuttery in a horror game where smooth motion matters.

For users with a 60 Hz display, any of these settings will provide a locked experience. For those with 120 Hz or higher refresh rates, 1080p Low, Medium, or High, and 1440p Low, Medium, or High all exceed 114.9 FPS, which is sufficient for fast-paced scenes. The database shows no minimum FPS data, so the average figures are the best guide, and they all indicate a smooth experience at the recommended settings.