Downfall

The Intel Core i5-9400 and Intel Arc B370 combination presents a very specific performance profile for Downfall, a Horror title from 2016. The recorded data shows that this system is highly resolution-dependent, with playable performance confined to 1080p and specific settings at 1440p. The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution (IGP), which fundamentally shapes the results, as it shares system memory and its performance is classified in the lowest percentile among all GPUs. This analysis breaks down the measured frames per second (FPS) data, settings guidance, and how this specific pairing compares to other tested hardware configurations.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?

A: No. The data shows no playable settings at 3840x2160. The highest average FPS recorded at this resolution is 43 FPS on Low settings, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. At Ultra settings, the average drops to 18 FPS.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: At 2560x1440, the only playable preset is Low, which achieves an average of 68 FPS. This is the sole setting that clears the 60 FPS threshold. Medium settings average 56 FPS, which is below the playable mark.

Q: What performance can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 64 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it the highest quality preset that remains playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-9400 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2254. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-1068NG7, scores 2259, which is only 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246, which is 0.4% lower. Performance is effectively identical among these processors.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to other GPUs?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, a 0.2% difference. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, which is 0.5% higher. These are very close performance levels.

Q: Is the 60 FPS target achievable at 4K with any settings?

A: No. The recorded data shows the highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 43 FPS on Low settings. The Medium preset averages 35 FPS, High averages 29 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. None of these reach the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

The data provides clear guidance for achieving a playable experience, defined as an average of 60 FPS or higher. At each resolution, we select the most demanding preset that still meets this target.

At 3840x2160, no settings preset is playable. The best average FPS recorded is 43 FPS on Low settings, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset averages 35 FPS, High averages 29 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. This resolution is not viable for this hardware combination.

At 2560x1440, the only playable preset is Low, which delivers an average of 68 FPS. This is the recommended setting for this resolution. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, which is close but below the playable threshold. High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the High preset is the most demanding playable option, achieving an average of 64 FPS. This is the recommended setting for 1080p. The Medium preset averages 78 FPS, and the Low preset averages 96 FPS, both of which are also playable. The Ultra preset averages 40 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

The data indicates a clear scaling pattern. At 1080p, users have three playable presets (Low, Medium, High). At 1440p, only one preset is playable (Low). At 4K, no presets are playable.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-9400 and Intel Arc B370 for Downfall. The combo rank is 3429 out of 3716 tested combinations. This places it in the lower percentile of all tested systems, indicating that most other hardware configurations will deliver better performance in this game.

This ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU. The Intel Arc B370 has a percentile rank of 5 among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than only 5% of all tested graphics cards. This is an extremely low position, indicating significant performance limitations. The CPU, the Intel Core i5-9400, has a percentile rank of 47, placing it in the middle of the pack. The combination of a mid-range CPU with a very low-end GPU results in a system that is bottlenecked by graphics processing.

The measured data confirms this. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 96 FPS, which shows the CPU is capable of high frame rates. However, as resolution and settings increase, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 18, a steep decline that points directly to GPU limitations. The rank of 3429 out of 3716 reflects this overall weakness in demanding scenarios.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rival data for both the CPU and GPU, which helps identify hardware that would behave similarly in this system. The performance differences are minimal, so swapping to any of these components would yield near-identical results.

For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-9400 has an average score of 2254. The nearest rivals are:

• Intel Core i7-1068NG7: score 2259, 0.2% faster
• Intel Core i3-10305: score 2264, 0.4% faster
• AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500: score 2246, 0.4% slower
• Intel Core i7-10710U: score 2248, 0.3% slower

These CPUs are all within a fraction of a percent of each other. In practical terms, any of these processors paired with the Intel Arc B370 would produce almost the same FPS results in Downfall. The choice between them would not noticeably alter the gaming experience.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B370 has an average score of 1184. The nearest rivals are:

• ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570: score 1186, 0.2% faster
• ATI Radeon HD 5770: score 1190, 0.5% faster
• AMD Radeon HD 7650M: score 1192, 0.7% faster
• AMD FirePro M2000: score 1168, 1.4% slower

Again, the performance deltas are very small. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 is the fastest rival listed, but its 0.5% advantage is negligible. Users with any of these GPUs paired with a similar CPU would see nearly identical frame rates. The data suggests that this performance tier is well-defined, and moving between these components will not change the fundamental playability picture.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU for Downfall. The CPU, Intel Core i5-9400, is a solid mid-range processor that is capable of high frame rates. The GPU, Intel Arc B370, is a low-power integrated solution that struggles with higher resolutions and settings.

At 1920x1080, the CPU appears to be the primary driver of performance at lower settings. The Low preset achieves 96 FPS, and the Medium preset achieves 78 FPS. These are high frame rates that suggest the CPU can handle the game's logic and physics without issue. However, the GPU begins to limit performance as settings increase. The High preset drops to 64 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 40 FPS. The scaling between Low and Ultra is severe, with a drop of 56 FPS, indicating the GPU is overwhelmed by the increased graphical load.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck. The Low preset averages 68 FPS, which is playable. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, a drop of 12 FPS from Low. The High preset averages 46 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 29 FPS. The frame rate drops consistently as settings are raised, showing that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution. The CPU's performance headroom, evident from the 1080p Low result, is not enough to compensate for the GPU's limitations.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is completely overwhelmed. The Low preset averages 43 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 18 FPS. The scaling is steep, with the Medium preset at 35 FPS and the High preset at 29 FPS. The CPU's role is minimized here, as even the lowest settings cannot produce a playable frame rate. The data shows that the GPU is the definitive bottleneck at 4K.

The resolution scaling also reveals this dynamic. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 96 at 1080p to 68 at 1440p, a 29% decrease. From 1440p to 4K, the average drops from 68 to 43, a 37% decrease. This shows that the GPU's performance degrades significantly as pixel count increases. In contrast, the CPU's performance is consistent, but its high frame rate potential at 1080p cannot be maintained at higher resolutions due to the GPU.

The Verdict

The verdict from the database is clear: this system can run Downfall, but only under specific conditions. The playable threshold is defined as an average of 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system is not playable at any settings preset. The verdict list shows no playable settings, and the best average FPS recorded is 43 FPS on Low. This resolution should be avoided.

At 2560x1440, the system is playable only on the Low settings preset. The average FPS at Low is 68, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. The best settings for this resolution are Low, with an average of 68 FPS. This is a viable option, but users must accept the lowest graphical quality.

At 1920x1080, the system is playable on three presets: High, Low, and Medium. The best playable settings are High, which achieves an average of 64 FPS. This is the optimal configuration for this system, providing the highest visual quality while maintaining playability. The Medium preset averages 78 FPS, and the Low preset averages 96 FPS, offering higher frame rates at lower quality.

The data supports a practical recommendation. For a smooth experience, users should play at 1080p with the High preset. This delivers 64 FPS, which is above the playable threshold. For 1440p, the Low preset is the only option, offering 68 FPS. The Ultra preset is not playable at any resolution, and 4K is entirely out of reach for this hardware combination. The Intel Core i5-9400 does its part, but the Intel Arc B370 is the clear limiting factor, and its integrated nature means this system is best suited for 1080p gaming in Downfall.