Downfall

The Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers an exceptionally high-performance baseline for Downfall, a 2016 horror title. Measured frame rates across all tested resolutions and presets are far above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with the data indicating that the GPU is rarely the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, the combination produces an average of 445.2 FPS on Low settings, scaling down to 188.8 FPS on Ultra, which demonstrates the sheer headroom this hardware provides for a game of this era. The benchmark results show that this configuration is not merely playable but overwhelmingly capable, positioning it in the 95th percentile rank out of 3716 tested combos for this specific title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a consistent pattern of performance that scales predictably with resolution and graphical preset. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the average frame rates are exceptionally high across all settings. The Low preset yields an average of 445.2 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 360.4 FPS. Increasing the load to High settings reduces the average to 297.4 FPS, and the Ultra preset still maintains a robust 188.8 FPS average. These figures indicate that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU combination has substantial unused capacity, as even the most demanding preset fails to stress the system to its limits.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains elevated but shows the expected impact of additional pixel rendering. The Low preset averages 314.5 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 1080p result but still exceptionally high. The Medium preset averages 257.6 FPS, and the High preset delivers 214.7 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 134.4 FPS, which is still more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a reduction of approximately 29% for Low settings and 29% for Ultra settings, indicating a uniform load increase across presets.

At 3840x2160, or 4K resolution, the performance remains well above playable levels, though the demands of 4K rendering are evident. The Low preset averages 196.7 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 163.3 FPS. The High preset delivers 134.5 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 84.1 FPS. This final figure is the lowest recorded in the entire dataset, yet it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a comfortable margin. The transition from 1440p to 4K results in a performance drop of approximately 37% for Low settings and 37% for Ultra settings, which aligns with the increased pixel count. Notably, the data does not include min or max FPS values, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates, but the consistency across presets suggests stable performance without significant dips.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Examining the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware might achieve similar results in Downfall. The Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, and its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with an average score of 49228, representing a negligible 0.3% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, which is 0.4% lower, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, a 0.8% deficit. On the higher end, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% above the i5-14600KF. These deltas are all within one percent, meaning that a system using any of these CPUs would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Downfall, as the game does not appear to be heavily CPU-bound at the tested resolutions.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347, and its nearest rival is the Intel Arc Pro A60 with a score of 60326, showing a 0% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60140, which is 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 2.5% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657, a 2.9% deficit. These rival GPUs, while not consumer gaming cards in most cases, exhibit benchmark scores so close to the RTX 4090 that in a game like Downfall, the frame rate differences would be minimal. The data implies that any of these GPU alternatives, when paired with a similarly performing CPU, would deliver frame rates within a few percentage points of the measured results, meaning the overall experience would remain well above 60 FPS at all settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data for Downfall reveals an interesting dynamic between the CPU and GPU across different resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high, with the Low preset reaching 445.2 FPS. Such high frame rates suggest that the CPU, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently, but the GPU is not the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a reduction from 445.2 FPS to 188.8 FPS, a 58% decrease, which is driven entirely by the GPU workload as the preset increases. However, the fact that even Ultra at 1080p exceeds 180 FPS indicates that the CPU has sufficient headroom to avoid limiting performance.

As the resolution increases to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across all presets, with Low averaging 314.5 FPS and Ultra averaging 134.4 FPS. This 57% reduction from Low to Ultra is similar to the 1080p scaling, suggesting that the GPU is becoming more influential, but the CPU still maintains a strong role. The jump from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset reduces performance by roughly 29%, which aligns with the increased pixel count and points to the GPU handling the additional load. At 3840x2160, the trend continues, with Low averaging 196.7 FPS and Ultra averaging 84.1 FPS, a 57% drop from Low to Ultra. The transition from 1440p to 4K reduces performance by about 37%, further indicating that the GPU is the dominant factor at this resolution.

The data implies that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU plays a more significant role in maintaining high frame rates, as the GPU is not fully saturated. The i5-14600KF, with its high single-core performance as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4594, is well-suited to handle the game's logic and draw calls. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the RTX 4090's raw throughput is taxed by the pixel load. The scaling between presets remains consistent across resolutions, suggesting that the game's settings have a uniform impact on GPU load, while the CPU's contribution is relatively constant. This means that for users targeting 4K Ultra, the GPU is the primary consideration, but for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the CPU's capabilities are equally important to avoid leaving performance on the table.

The Verdict

The question of whether this PC can run Downfall is answered unequivocally by the benchmark data. According to the verdictByResolution field, all tested resolutions and presets are playable, meaning they achieve an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 84.1 FPS. This is the most demanding scenario in the dataset, and it still clears the threshold by 24 FPS, providing a comfortable margin for gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is similarly positive, with all settings playable and Ultra as the best setting, achieving an average of 134.4 FPS. This is more than double the playability threshold, indicating that the system has substantial headroom at this resolution. At 1920x1080, the best setting is also Ultra, with an average of 188.8 FPS, which is over three times the minimum requirement. The data shows that this combination not only runs the game but does so at frame rates that would support high-refresh-rate displays, even at 4K resolution with maximum settings. The lowest recorded average, 84.1 FPS at 4K Ultra, is still well above the 60 FPS target, and the absence of min FPS data means there is no indication of stuttering or frame drops. This PC can run Downfall at any resolution and preset combination tested, with no compromises required.

Best Settings per Resolution

For users seeking the highest visual quality while maintaining at least 60 FPS, the data provides clear guidance on the best settings for each resolution. At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 84.1 FPS. This is the optimal choice for 4K gaming, as it delivers the maximum graphical fidelity while still providing a 24 FPS buffer above the playability threshold. The next step down, High, averages 134.5 FPS, which offers more headroom but at reduced visual quality, so Ultra is recommended for those prioritizing visuals.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, with an average of 134.4 FPS. This provides a significant margin above 60 FPS, allowing for smooth gameplay with all features enabled. The data shows that even at 1440p, the system is not stressed, and users can expect a consistently high frame rate. At 1920x1080, Ultra is again the best setting, averaging 188.8 FPS. This is the highest frame rate among the Ultra presets across resolutions, making it ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors. In all cases, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, as it maintains the highest visual quality without dropping below the 60 FPS threshold. The consistent performance across resolutions indicates that this hardware combination is overqualified for Downfall, and users can max out settings at any resolution without concern.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field places this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 95 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This ranking places it in the top 2.5% of all configurations tested, which is a remarkable result given the large pool of hardware combinations. The rank is based on the measured frame rates, and the data shows that this combo outperforms the vast majority of alternatives. The high rank is consistent with the raw performance of the components, as the RTX 4090 is the flagship GPU of its generation, and the i5-14600KF is a high-end desktop processor.

The ranking implies that only 94 other combinations in the database achieved higher average frame rates in this game, and those would likely involve even more powerful CPUs or specialized configurations. For practical purposes, this combo is among the best available for Downfall, delivering frame rates that are not only playable but exceptionally high. The rank of 95 out of 3716 also suggests that the combination is well-balanced, as neither component appears to be a significant bottleneck. The data indicates that users with this setup are unlikely to encounter performance limitations in this game, and the ranking reinforces the conclusion that this is a top-tier configuration for Downfall.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Downfall?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 445.2, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset.

Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra settings in Downfall?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 84.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600KF compare to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900's score of 49228.

Q: What is the best setting at 2560x1440 to maintain 60 FPS or higher?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average of 134.4 FPS, making it the best setting that stays above 60 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 significantly faster than its nearest GPU rival in benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4090 scores 60347, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60326, showing a 0% difference, indicating nearly identical benchmark performance.

Q: What rank does this combo hold among all tested configurations for Downfall?

A: The combo is ranked 95 out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the top percentile of all configurations.