Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
400 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
168 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
285 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
120 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
178 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
74 FPS
3.7ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 48,618
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 74 119 145 178
1440p QHD 120 191 233 285
1080p Full HD 168 268 327 400

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 268
1920x1080 Low 400
1920x1080 Medium 327
1920x1080 Ultra 168
2560x1440 High 191
2560x1440 Low 285
2560x1440 Medium 233
2560x1440 Ultra 120
3840x2160 High 119
3840x2160 Low 178
3840x2160 Medium 145
3840x2160 Ultra 74

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a decisive performance result in Downfall: this combination clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested preset across 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 resolutions. The data shows that even the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K produces an average of 74 FPS, meaning this system has substantial headroom for max-settings play. Benchmark results indicate a top-tier ranking within the game's tested hardware pool, placing 230th out of 3716 combinations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a consistent pattern of high performance scaling with resolution. At 1920x1080, the lowest tested settings produce an average of 400 FPS, while the High preset yields 268 FPS. The Medium preset shows an average of 327 FPS with a minimum of 278 and maximum of 376, and Ultra settings still deliver a robust 168 FPS average. These numbers demonstrate that at 1080p, the RTX 4080 is never remotely constrained by the i5-14600K; the frame rates are exceptionally high across all quality levels.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains far above playable thresholds. Low settings average 285 FPS, High settings average 191 FPS, and Medium settings average 233 FPS (minimum 198, maximum 268). The Ultra preset at 1440p delivers an average of 120 FPS, which is exactly double the playable threshold of 60 FPS. This resolution represents a sweet spot where visual quality is high and frame rates remain comfortably in high-refresh-rate territory.

At 3840x2160, the system's capability is most clearly tested. Low settings produce an average of 178 FPS, Medium settings average 145 FPS (minimum 123, maximum 167), and High settings average 119 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only configuration that drops below 100 FPS, yet it still maintains a solid 74 FPS average. Notably, the data does not list minimum or maximum values for High or Ultra at this resolution, but the averages alone confirm playability. The scaling from 1080p Ultra (168 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (120 FPS) to 4K Ultra (74 FPS) shows a predictable performance curve driven by pixel count.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance characteristics of this hardware combination in Downfall indicate a GPU-centric workload at higher resolutions, with the CPU showing diminishing influence as pixel count increases. The evidence for this lies in the frame rate scaling between presets and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the jump from Low (400 FPS) to Ultra (168 FPS) represents a 58% reduction in frame rate, which is a massive swing driven almost entirely by GPU rendering load. The i5-14600K, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, clearly provides enough instruction throughput to keep the RTX 4080 fed at these high frame rates.

At 2560x1440, the same preset progression shows a similar relative drop: Low at 285 FPS down to Ultra at 120 FPS, a 58% decrease. This consistency suggests that the GPU remains the primary bottleneck across both resolutions, and the CPU's role is static in comparison. The fact that 1440p Low (285 FPS) is actually lower than 1080p Low (400 FPS) points to the GPU becoming more stressed as resolution increases, independent of CPU load.

The 4K results further confirm this distribution. At 3840x2160, Low settings average 178 FPS, which is 37% lower than the same preset at 1440p. The Ultra preset at 4K (74 FPS) is 38% lower than 1440p Ultra (120 FPS). This proportional scaling across resolutions is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario. The i5-14600K's high single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 and Passmark single-thread score of 4270, is more than adequate for Downfall's engine demands. The CPU's percentile rank of 90 among all tested CPUs reinforces that this processor is unlikely to be the limiting factor in any tested configuration.

Best Settings per Resolution

The optimal settings for this system, defined as the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, are identical across all three resolutions: Ultra is playable everywhere. At 1920x1080, Ultra delivers an average of 168 FPS, providing exceptional smoothness on high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset maintains a 120 FPS average, which is ideal for 120 Hz displays and leaves significant headroom for any temporary frame drops.

At 3840x2160, Ultra is still the best choice, with an average of 74 FPS. While this falls below the 100 FPS mark that some 4K displays target, it comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity at 4K, the Ultra preset is unequivocally recommended based on the data. The measured FPS at this setting (74 average) indicates that even the most demanding configuration in Downfall cannot push this hardware below the playable line. there is no scenario in the measured data where a lower preset is required to achieve playability.

FAQ

*Q: Can the Intel Core i5-14600K and RTX 4080 run Downfall at 4K Ultra settings?*

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 74, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data confirms Ultra is the best playable setting at this resolution.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1440p with High settings?

A: The data shows an average of 191 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. This is significantly above the playable threshold and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: How does the performance scale from 1080p to 4K?

A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 168 at 1920x1080 to 120 at 2560x1440, and then to 74 at 3840x2160. This represents a 56% reduction from 1080p to 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary constraint. The frame rate scaling between resolutions and presets shows consistent GPU-bound behavior, and the i5-14600K's strong benchmark scores (90th percentile among CPUs) suggest it is not a bottleneck.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for Medium settings?

A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 278 at 1920x1080, 198 at 2560x1440, and 123 at 3840x2160. These minimums all far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 outperform its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247. Its closest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54209, which is a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores higher at 54828, a 1.1% difference.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, benchmark data shows several alternatives within a narrow performance band. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H has an average score of 48698, which is 0.2% lower than the i5-14600K's 48618 average. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, a 0.3% difference, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, a 0.7% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, which is 0.8% higher. These four processors all sit within a 1.5% performance envelope, meaning any of them would produce nearly identical frame rates in Downfall when paired with the RTX 4080.

For the GPU, the nearest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, with an average score of 54209 versus the RTX 4080's 54247 — a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, which is 1.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a 2.6% advantage, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a 2.7% lead. These deltas are small enough that in real-world Downfall gameplay, the FPS differences would be minimal, likely within a few frames per second at any given setting. Users with any of these GPUs should expect broadly similar playability profiles, though the exact measured FPS values would vary slightly.

The Verdict

This system can unequivocally run Downfall at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The verdict data confirms that Ultra is the best playable setting at every resolution, with average FPS of 168 at 1920x1080, 120 at 2560x1440, and 74 at 3840x2160. The 60 FPS playable threshold is cleared by a wide margin in every scenario, including the most demanding 4K Ultra configuration. The RTX 4080's 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs and the i5-14600K's 90th percentile CPU ranking combine to place this hardware in the top tier of systems tested for Downfall. For users seeking the absolute highest visual fidelity without compromise, this platform delivers a definitive yes. The only consideration is that at 4K Ultra, the 74 FPS average falls short of 100 FPS, which some competitive players might prefer, but the playability threshold is unquestionably met.