Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 49 | 59 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 78 | 95 | 116 |
| 1080p Full HD | 68 | 109 | 133 | 163 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600K and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly playable experience in Downfall at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring a significant settings compromise. The data indicates a clear performance ceiling at 4K Ultra, where frame rates drop below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This pairing behaves as a mid-range 1080p and 1440p performer, with the CPU providing ample headroom and the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The benchmark data places this specific CPU and GPU combination within a tightly clustered field of alternatives. The Intel Core i5-14600K's average benchmark score of 48,618 places it within 1% of several other processors. The AMD EPYC 4345P sits marginally ahead with an average score of 48,470, a delta of 0.3%. Similarly, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX trails by 0.7% with a score of 48,287, while the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and Intel Core Ultra 5 245 are within 0.2% and 0.8% respectively. For gaming workloads, this suggests that swapping the i5-14600K for any of these rivals would yield nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Downfall, as the CPU is rarely the limiting factor.
On the graphics side, the Intel Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20,556 is nearly identical to its nearest competitors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, a delta of just 0.1%, while the Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% behind at 20,582. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M also fall within a 0.5% window, with scores of 20,662 and 20,480 respectively. In practical terms, any of these GPUs would produce essentially the same frame rates in Downfall at the same settings. The Arc B570's performance profile is therefore well-established, with no single rival offering a meaningful advantage.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Intel Core i5-14600K and the Intel Arc B570 in Downfall is strongly resolution-dependent. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the dominant factor, but the CPU's capabilities still allow for very high frame rates. The data shows a progression from 163 FPS at Low settings to 68 FPS at Ultra, a drop of 95 FPS. This scaling is entirely attributable to the GPU's workload, as the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide more than enough processing power for the game's horror genre demands at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced. Frame rates decline across all settings compared to 1080p, with Low dropping from 163 FPS to 116 FPS, and Ultra falling from 68 FPS to 49 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 67 FPS, indicating that the Arc B570's shading units, TMUs, and ROPs are increasingly strained as pixel count rises. The CPU remains a non-issue, as the i5-14600K's single-threaded performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,491, does not bottleneck the GPU at these settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the limiting component. The Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain playable frame rates at higher presets. The Ultra preset produces only 30 FPS, while Medium achieves 59 FPS. The jump from Low at 72 FPS to Medium at 59 FPS represents a 13 FPS loss, highlighting how quickly the GPU saturates at 4K. The CPU's role is negligible here; even a significantly weaker processor would produce identical results. The data confirms that for this game, the i5-14600K provides consistent headroom across all resolutions, while the Arc B570 determines the playable settings ceiling.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 1920x1080 with maximum settings?*
A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 achieves an average of 68 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the highest settings preset available, and the combination clears it by 8 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440?
A: The High preset is the most demanding option that maintains 60 FPS, averaging 78 FPS. The Medium preset also clears the threshold at 95 FPS, but High offers superior visual quality while still providing 18 FPS of headroom over the playable limit.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only at the Low preset. The 3840x2160 Low setting averages 72 FPS, which is playable. Medium drops to 59 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold, while High and Ultra produce 49 FPS and 30 FPS respectively, which are not playable by the standard used here.
Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its closest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20,556 is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc A750, AMD Radeon R9 M390X, and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M. This means any of these GPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Downfall.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?
A: No. The Intel Core i5-14600K's performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,491 and a single-core score of 2,064, far exceeds the demands of Downfall. Even at 1080p Low, where the GPU produces 163 FPS, the CPU keeps pace without limiting performance.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1440p Medium?
A: The 2560x1440 Medium preset averages 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. This provides a smooth experience well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, with no visible dips below the target.
The Verdict
This system can run Downfall successfully, but the playable settings vary significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS threshold, making this the only resolution where the Ultra preset is viable at 68 FPS. At 2560x1440, three presets are playable: High at 78 FPS, Medium at 95 FPS, and Low at 116 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 49 FPS. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves playable performance at 72 FPS. The Medium preset sits just below the threshold at 59 FPS, while High and Ultra are not viable at 49 FPS and 30 FPS respectively. The data indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the i5-14600K consistently provides sufficient processing power.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured frame rates show a wide spread across presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 163 FPS, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. Medium delivers 133 FPS average, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS. High produces 109 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 68 FPS average. All presets at this resolution remain comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Low averages 116 FPS, Medium averages 95 FPS with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS, High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra averages 49 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 81 FPS ensures no frame drops below the playable threshold, while the Ultra preset's 49 FPS average falls 11 FPS short of playable.
At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles under load. Low averages 72 FPS, Medium averages 59 FPS with a minimum of 50 FPS and a maximum of 68 FPS, High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 30 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 50 FPS is particularly notable, as it indicates significant frame dips during intense scenes, making the 59 FPS average misleading for smooth gameplay.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings preset is Ultra, which achieves an average of 68 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available and still clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by 8 FPS. No other preset at this resolution offers higher visual quality while maintaining playability.
At 2560x1440, the best settings preset is High, with an average of 78 FPS. This provides 18 FPS of headroom over the playable threshold while delivering substantially better visual fidelity than the Medium preset, which averages 95 FPS but at lower quality. The Ultra preset is not playable at 49 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the best settings preset is Low, which averages 72 FPS. This is the only preset at this resolution that clears the 60 FPS threshold, and it does so by 12 FPS. The Medium preset falls short at 59 FPS, so users targeting 4K must accept Low settings for playable performance.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-14600K and Intel Arc B570 combination ranks 2,988 out of 3,716 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is consistent with the measured performance data. The ranking reflects that while the system handles 1080p and 1440p well, its 4K performance is limited, and the overall average frame rates across all resolutions and presets are dragged down by the 30 FPS result at 4K Ultra. The CPU's strong benchmark scores, including a Passmark multi-thread score of 38,682 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 16,673, do not compensate for the GPU's mid-range positioning, as indicated by its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This combo is a capable 1080p and 1440p performer, but it does not compete with higher-end systems that can maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. The ranking of 2,988 out of 3,716 suggests that roughly 20% of tested configurations perform worse, while the majority outperform it, primarily due to stronger GPU selections.