Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 79 | 97 | 121 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 132 | 158 | 194 |
| 1080p Full HD | 113 | 180 | 224 | 269 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti delivers a strong performance profile for Downfall, ranking in the 1326th position out of 3716 tested combinations. This places the combo in the upper third of all tested systems, indicating that it is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at most resolutions. The data shows that this combination only struggles at the demanding 4K Ultra preset, where it falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Across all other tested settings and resolutions, the combo maintains average frame rates well above the playability target, making it a reliable choice for a smooth horror experience.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 1326 out of 3716 tested combinations places it in the 64th percentile of all systems tested for Downfall. This is a solid position, reflecting a balanced pairing of a capable mid-range CPU with a high-end GPU. The processor's average benchmark score of 25292 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card's average score of 29945 puts it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. When combined, these components deliver a system that significantly outperforms the minimum requirements, providing a substantial performance buffer for the game's horror atmosphere, which often relies on consistent frame pacing.
The ranking indicates that the i5-13400F does not bottleneck the RTX 3070 Ti in this title. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, provide ample processing power for the game's logic and physics. The GPU's 6144 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6X memory handle the visual load effectively. The data reveals a system that is not at the extreme top end but sits comfortably in the upper-middle tier, making it a versatile option for gamers who want high frame rates without needing the absolute fastest hardware available. The performance is consistent, with no single component drastically limiting the other, resulting in the strong overall ranking observed in the benchmark data.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, it can run the game at 4K with High settings, achieving an average of 79.2 FPS. It also clears the 60 FPS threshold on Medium (97.2 FPS) and Low (120.6 FPS) presets. However, the Ultra preset at 4K drops to an average of 48.1 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: At 2560x1440, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 82.1 FPS. This means users can run the game at maximum visual quality at 1440p without worrying about frame rate drops.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25292. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, scores 25284, a negligible 0% difference. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D are only 0.3% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is 0.4% slower. Performance is essentially identical among these options.
Q: What GPU performance is comparable to the RTX 3070 Ti?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti's average benchmark score of 29945 is nearly matched by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, which is only 0.1% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 0.5% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is the most different, being 1.6% slower.
Q: Is the 1080p performance sufficient for a high-refresh-rate monitor?
A: Absolutely. At 1920x1080, even the Ultra preset delivers an average of 112.6 FPS. Lowering to High yields 179.6 FPS, and the Low preset reaches 269.2 FPS. This makes the combo ideal for 144Hz or even 240Hz displays at 1080p.
Q: Which resolution offers the best balance of quality and performance?
A: According to the data, 2560x1440 with Ultra settings provides the best balance, delivering an average of 82.1 FPS. This resolution offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining frame rates that are well above the 60 FPS threshold, unlike 4K Ultra which fails to hit it.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS is identified. This analysis uses the measured average FPS data to determine the optimal balance between visual quality and smooth gameplay.
3840x2160 (4K): The best playable preset is High, which achieves an average of 79.2 FPS. While the Medium preset is also playable at 97.2 FPS and Low at 120.6 FPS, High offers the best visual fidelity while still providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset is not recommended, as it falls to 48.1 FPS.
2560x1440 (1440p): The best playable preset is Ultra, delivering an average of 82.1 FPS. This is the highest quality setting tested, and it comfortably surpasses the 60 FPS threshold. All other presets are also playable, with High at 131.5 FPS, Medium at 157.9 FPS, and Low at 194.1 FPS, but Ultra provides the best experience without sacrificing performance.
1920x1080 (1080p): The best playable preset is Ultra, which reaches an average of 112.6 FPS. This resolution is the most forgiving, allowing the game to run at maximum settings with a frame rate that is nearly double the playable threshold. The High preset achieves 179.6 FPS, Medium hits 223.8 FPS, and Low tops out at 269.2 FPS, but Ultra is the recommended choice for the best visuals.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the nearest rival data for both the CPU and GPU, several hardware combinations would yield similar performance in Downfall. These alternatives are identified by their average benchmark scores, which are within a narrow margin of the components in this review.
Processor Alternatives: The Intel Core i5-13400F's performance is nearly identical to several other CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS matches its score with a 0% delta. The Intel Core 5 120 and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D are both 0.3% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is 0.4% slower. Systems using any of these processors would experience virtually indistinguishable frame rates in Downfall, as the differences in average benchmark scores are within the margin of error.
Graphics Card Alternatives: The RTX 3070 Ti's performance is closely matched by a few other GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is 0.1% faster, making it a direct equivalent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 is 0.5% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is the most different, being 1.6% slower, but it would still be in the same performance ballpark. Users with any of these cards would see very similar frame rates.
Combined System Performance: When considering a full system, swapping the i5-13400F for a Ryzen 9 6900HS or a Core 5 120, and swapping the RTX 3070 Ti for an RTX 5070 Mobile or RX 6800, would result in a system with a nearly identical performance profile. The combined benchmark scores of these alternative pairings would be within a few points of the original, meaning the measured FPS in Downfall would be essentially the same. These alternatives represent viable options for users looking for comparable hardware.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following data presents the average frame rates measured for this specific combination of processor and graphics card. The tests were conducted at three resolutions and four settings presets, with all results representing the average FPS observed.
3840x2160 (4K):
- Low: 120.6 FPS
- Medium: 97.2 FPS
- High: 79.2 FPS
- Ultra: 48.1 FPS
2560x1440 (1440p):
- Low: 194.1 FPS
- Medium: 157.9 FPS
- High: 131.5 FPS
- Ultra: 82.1 FPS
1920x1080 (1080p):
- Low: 269.2 FPS
- Medium: 223.8 FPS
- High: 179.6 FPS
- Ultra: 112.6 FPS
The data shows a clear scaling pattern. At 4K, the jump from High to Ultra represents a substantial 39.4% performance hit, dropping below the playable threshold. At 1440p, the scaling is more gradual, with Ultra remaining highly playable. At 1080p, all presets provide excellent performance, with even the most demanding setting delivering over 110 FPS. The frame rate drops are consistent with the increased pixel count and shading complexity at higher resolutions and settings.
The Verdict
This PC configuration can run Downfall successfully across the vast majority of tested scenarios. The verdict by resolution is clear: the combo clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at 1080p and 1440p on all settings, including the maximum Ultra preset. At 4K, it is also playable on High, Medium, and Low settings, with only the Ultra preset failing to reach 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the system excels, providing an average of 112.6 FPS on Ultra settings. This is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay and is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, the system continues to impress, with Ultra settings delivering an average of 82.1 FPS. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for this hardware, offering a significant visual upgrade over 1080p without compromising frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the system remains capable, but users must be selective with settings. The High preset delivers a solid 79.2 FPS, providing a great 4K experience. The Ultra preset is the only configuration that fails to meet the playability standard, with an average of 48.1 FPS. Therefore, the verdict is that this PC is highly recommended for Downfall at 1080p and 1440p, and it is also a capable 4K machine as long as the Ultra preset is avoided in favor of High settings.