Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 64 | 100 | 122 | 148 |
| 1440p QHD | 100 | 160 | 195 | 244 |
| 1080p Full HD | 141 | 227 | 277 | 339 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 delivers a thoroughly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Downfall, and it even manages to keep every preset playable at 4K. The measured data shows a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings, with the RTX 5070’s performance headroom becoming the defining factor as pixel counts rise. Across all tested configurations, the combination never drops below the 60 FPS playability threshold, though the margin at 4K Ultra is notably slimmer than elsewhere.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces frame rates that are almost excessive for a horror title. At Low settings, the average FPS reaches 338.6, while Medium yields 277.1 and High drops to 226.5. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still averages 141.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial — a 197.2 FPS difference — which points to the RTX 5070 having ample compute headroom at this resolution, with the CPU likely becoming a more significant contributor as settings scale down. Even at Ultra, the 141.4 average is more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold, so there is no practical concern about smoothness at 1080p.
Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern holds but with expected compression. Low settings average 243.6 FPS, Medium drops to 195.4, and High settles at 160.4. Ultra remains comfortably above 100 FPS with a 100.2 average. The relative drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across presets: Low falls by 95 FPS, Medium by 81.7, High by 66.1, and Ultra by 41.2. This scaling suggests that the GPU is the primary limiter at higher settings, as the absolute FPS losses grow when the preset is more demanding. The 1440p Ultra result of 100.2 FPS is particularly notable because it shows the RTX 5070 can handle a heavy load at a high resolution without breaking a sweat.
At 3840x2160, the results become more interesting. Low settings average 148.3 FPS, Medium 121.5, and High 99.6. The Ultra preset falls to 64.4 FPS, which is just 4.4 FPS above the playability threshold. This is the only configuration where the system approaches its limits. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steep: Ultra loses 35.8 FPS, High loses 60.8, Medium loses 73.9, and Low loses 95.3. The fact that Low at 4K still averages 148.3 FPS indicates that the RTX 5070 has enough raw throughput to handle the resolution, but Ultra’s 64.4 average shows that the most demanding settings push the GPU to its edge. No min or max FPS data was recorded for any configuration, so the analysis relies solely on averages, but the consistency of the scaling suggests stable performance.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-12600KF, based on aggregate benchmark scores, are a tight cluster of CPUs. The Intel Core i9-10900K scores 27872, which is 0.3% lower than the i5-12600KF’s 27799 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712, just 0.3% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U scores 27887, 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 27896, also 0.3% higher. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios — such as Downfall at 1080p Low — any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates. The i5-12600KF sits at the 79th percentile of all CPUs, so it is a solidly mid-to-high-range part, but its rivals show that it is not an outlier in either direction. A system builder swapping in a Ryzen 7 5800X3D or a Core i9-10900K would expect virtually the same CPU-side performance in this game.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070’s nearest rivals are a more eclectic group. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318, just 0.1% below the RTX 5070’s 40377 average. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063, 0.8% lower, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, 2% lower. These are professional or mobile parts, not gaming GPUs, but the benchmark data indicates they would deliver comparable raw performance. In Downfall, the RTX 5070’s 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs means it is well above average, and the nearest rivals suggest that a system with a Radeon Pro 5300 would produce similar frame rates at the same settings. The 2% delta with the RTX A500 Mobile is the largest gap, but even that would translate to a difference of only a few FPS at 4K Ultra. None of these rivals would change the fundamental verdict: the system remains playable at every resolution and preset.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Ultra is 197.2 FPS, which is the largest absolute spread of any resolution. This suggests that the CPU is keeping pace with even the lowest settings, allowing the GPU to stretch its legs. The 338.6 FPS result at 1080p Low is likely near the CPU’s maximum frame delivery capability, since the RTX 5070 would otherwise push even higher. At 2560x1440, the spread between Low and Ultra narrows to 143.4 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it shrinks further to 83.9 FPS. This compression indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution rises, because the same preset changes produce smaller absolute FPS gains when the GPU is already saturated.
The scaling between resolutions reinforces this interpretation. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra costs 41.2 FPS, while moving from 1440p to 4K at Ultra costs 35.8 FPS. The losses are similar, which points to a GPU that is being progressively more stressed but not catastrophically so. At Low settings, the 1080p-to-1440p drop is 95 FPS and the 1440p-to-4K drop is 95.3 FPS, showing that the GPU’s fill rate is the dominant constraint even at low settings. The RTX 5070’s 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are the likely drivers here, and the data shows that the CPU — with its 20 MB shared L3 cache and 10 cores — is not the limiting factor at any resolution above 1080p Low. For players targeting 1440p or 4K, the GPU is the component to watch, while at 1080p the CPU’s single-thread performance (a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1016) is sufficient to avoid bottlenecks.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-12600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination can run Downfall at every tested resolution and preset, according to the verdict data. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 141.4 FPS — well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra averaging 100.2 FPS. At 3840x2160, all presets also clear 60 FPS, but Ultra is the tightest fit at 64.4 FPS. The system’s best settings at each resolution, as defined by the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, are Ultra for all three resolutions. This means a player can run the game at maximum quality at 4K and still maintain playable frame rates, though the margin is only 4.4 FPS. For those who prefer a more comfortable buffer, dropping to High at 4K yields 99.6 FPS, which is a 35.2 FPS improvement over Ultra. The verdict is unambiguous: this PC handles Downfall with room to spare at 1080p and 1440p, and it remains viable at 4K even under the heaviest load.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 714th out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the top 19.2% of all configurations. This is a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank reflects the RTX 5070’s 82nd percentile position among all GPUs, which outweighs the i5-12600KF’s more modest 79th percentile among CPUs. In a game like Downfall, which is not particularly demanding by modern standards given its 2016 release date, the GPU’s dominance in the ranking makes sense. The 714th rank means there are 713 combinations that perform better, but the vast majority of those likely feature more powerful GPUs or newer CPUs. For a system with a 10-core, 16-thread CPU and a 12 GB GDDR7 GPU, this ranking is consistent with the measured FPS data: excellent at 1080p and 1440p, and very good at 4K. The percentile gap between the CPU and GPU — 79 versus 82 — suggests that the CPU is the weaker link, but the FPS results show it rarely matters in practice.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 141.4 FPS. This is the most demanding preset, and it clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. Players can max out every visual option without concern. At 2560x1440, Ultra is also the best choice, averaging 100.2 FPS. The 40 FPS drop from 1080p Ultra to 1440p Ultra is noticeable but still leaves ample headroom. At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best settings, but the 64.4 FPS average is just 4.4 FPS above the playability threshold. This is the only configuration where the system’s limits are visible. The data shows that High at 4K would average 99.6 FPS, which is a much safer target for players who prioritize smoothness over maximum visual fidelity. The recommendation, based purely on the measured FPS, is to run Ultra at all resolutions, but the 4K Ultra result is a borderline case that invites caution. The RTX 5070’s 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 192-bit bus are sufficient for the game’s demands, but the 64.4 average suggests that future updates or more demanding scenes could push it below 60. For the most consistent experience, 1440p Ultra at 100.2 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a high-quality image with a substantial performance buffer.