Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 57 | 68 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 86 | 109 | 133 |
| 1080p Full HD | 76 | 123 | 149 | 182 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Downfall, with 4K requiring settings compromises. Benchmark data places this combo at rank 2841 out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the 76th percentile of all tested systems. The measured frame rates show a clear pattern: the system comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold at 1080p across all settings, handles 1440p well up to High settings, and only at 4K does the Ultra preset fall below playable levels.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400F and Intel Arc B580 ranks 2841st out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places the system in the upper quarter of all configurations tested, indicating a solid mid-to-high tier performer for this title. The CPU itself sits at the 73rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 68th percentile among all graphics cards. These individual percentiles suggest a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 19039 places it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (19047), within 0.1% of the Intel Core 3 201E (19056), and 0.3% ahead of both the Intel Core i5-1335U (18982) and AMD EPYC 7773X (18979). This tight clustering indicates the i5-12400F delivers performance essentially identical to these rivals in synthetic testing. The GPU's average benchmark score of 23021 sits 0.2% below the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061), 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895), 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172), and 1% below the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249). This places the Arc B580 in a competitive position against older high-end cards, though the ranking position suggests that for Downfall specifically, the combo performs as expected given these component-level scores.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to Downfall's performance across resolutions and presets. At 1080p, the system achieves 182 FPS on Low settings, 149 FPS on Medium, 123.4 FPS on High, and 76.1 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 58% performance drop, indicating the GPU becomes increasingly stressed as visual complexity rises. At this resolution, the CPU has ample headroom, and the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates.
Moving to 1440p, performance drops to 133 FPS on Low, 109.1 FPS on Medium, 85.5 FPS on High, and 54.3 FPS on Ultra. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at each preset shows a consistent reduction: Low drops by 26.9%, Medium by 26.8%, High by 30.7%, and Ultra by 28.6%. These relatively uniform reductions indicate that the GPU is now working harder, but the CPU still provides sufficient support. The 1440p Ultra result falling below 60 FPS while 1080p Ultra remains well above suggests a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.
At 4K, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings produce 82.3 FPS, Medium produces 68 FPS, High produces 56.6 FPS, and Ultra drops to 32.1 FPS. The jump from 1440p to 4K shows more severe reductions: Low falls by 38.1%, Medium by 37.7%, High by 33.8%, and Ultra by 40.9%. These larger percentage drops indicate the GPU is now the dominant constraint. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K, as the Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors. The data shows that Downfall scales predictably with resolution, and the CPU's influence is most pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates are highest.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Downfall at 60 FPS on 1080p Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 76.1 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold by 26.8%.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 4K resolution?
A: Medium settings provide the best playable experience at 3840x2160, delivering an average of 68 FPS. High settings at this resolution fall below the threshold at 56.6 FPS, while Ultra drops to 32.1 FPS.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Arc B580 scores 23021 on average, which is 0.6% higher than the RTX 2080's average score of 22895. In practical terms, the two cards perform nearly identically in synthetic tests.
Q: Does the i5-12400F bottleneck the Arc B580 in Downfall?
A: The data shows balanced scaling across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 182 FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 32.1 FPS, indicating GPU limitation rather than CPU bottlenecking.
Q: What is the playable settings list for 1440p?
A: High, Medium, and Low settings all maintain average frame rates above 60 FPS at 2560x1440. High produces 85.5 FPS, Medium produces 109.1 FPS, and Low produces 133 FPS. Ultra falls below the threshold at 54.3 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?
A: The i5-12400F scores 1680 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 12380 in multi-core, giving a multi-core to single-core ratio of approximately 7.4x. The 3DMark single-thread score of 909 versus max-threads score of 5912 shows a similar scaling pattern.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-12400F with Intel Arc B580 can absolutely run Downfall, with the playability threshold of 60 FPS determining the boundaries. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets clear the threshold: Low at 182 FPS, Medium at 149 FPS, High at 123.4 FPS, and Ultra at 76.1 FPS. This makes 1080p the most flexible resolution, allowing players to choose any preset and maintain smooth performance.
At 2560x1440, the system remains highly playable on three of four presets. High settings deliver 85.5 FPS, Medium delivers 109.1 FPS, and Low delivers 133 FPS. Only Ultra falls short at 54.3 FPS, which is 9.5% below the threshold. Players wanting Ultra at 1440p would need to accept slightly reduced frame rates or drop to High for a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the system requires more careful settings management. Medium settings produce 68 FPS, which clears the threshold by 13.3%. Low settings produce 82.3 FPS for those prioritizing frame rate over visuals. High settings at 56.6 FPS and Ultra at 32.1 FPS both fall below playable levels. The verdict is clear: this system delivers playable performance at 1080p and 1440p with room to spare, and at 4K only when using Medium or Low presets.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic testing all perform within 0.3% of the i5-12400F's average score of 19039. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS matches it exactly with a 0% delta, making it the closest equivalent. The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19056, just 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X both score within 0.3% of the i5-12400F, at 18982 and 18979 respectively. Systems built with any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Downfall.
On the GPU side, the Arc B580's nearest rivals show slightly wider variance. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% above the Arc B580's 23021. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, 0.7% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA P106-100 leads the group at 23249, 1% above the Arc B580. For Downfall specifically, a system with the RTX 2080 or RTX 3080 would behave similarly to the Arc B580 in terms of frame rates, though the RTX 3080's higher synthetic score suggests it might hold a slight edge in GPU-bound scenarios at 4K.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Medium, which delivers an average of 68 FPS. This provides a 13.3% margin above the threshold, making it the recommended choice for 4K play. Low settings at 82.3 FPS offer an alternative for higher frame rates, but Medium represents the best balance of visual quality and performance.
At 2560x1440, High settings are the optimal choice, producing 85.5 FPS on average. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by 42.5%, providing substantial headroom for demanding scenes. Medium and Low also remain playable, but High offers the best visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver 76.1 FPS, which is 26.8% above the threshold. This makes Ultra the clear choice for 1080p gaming, as it provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable frame rate margin. All lower presets also remain playable, but Ultra is the recommended setting for this resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates show a clear progression: Low settings produce 82.3 FPS, Medium produces 68 FPS, High produces 56.6 FPS, and Ultra produces 32.1 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 11.4 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 24.5 FPS, indicating that Ultra's additional visual effects carry a significant performance cost.
At 2560x1440, the system delivers 133 FPS on Low, 109.1 FPS on Medium, 85.5 FPS on High, and 54.3 FPS on Ultra. The step from Medium to High costs 23.6 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs 31.2 FPS. This pattern shows diminishing returns as settings increase, with Ultra requiring a substantial performance sacrifice.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are 182 FPS on Low, 149 FPS on Medium, 123.4 FPS on High, and 76.1 FPS on Ultra. The transition from Low to Medium costs 33 FPS, from Medium to High costs 25.6 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs 47.3 FPS. The Ultra preset's 76.1 FPS average still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, but the 38.3% drop from High to Ultra highlights the significant GPU workload increase. Across all resolutions, the data shows that Downfall's Ultra preset is substantially more demanding than High, and the Arc B580's 12 GB memory buffer handles the title's requirements effectively up to 1440p High and 4K Medium.