Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 68 | 82 | 101 |
| 1440p QHD | 68 | 108 | 132 | 162 |
| 1080p Full HD | 95 | 152 | 185 | 226 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for Downfall with the Intel Core i5-11400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 shows a system that comfortably handles the game across most settings. At 1920x1080, the lowest preset delivers an average of 226 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 185 FPS with a minimum of 157 FPS and a maximum of 213 FPS. High settings at 1080p produce an average of 152 FPS, and the Ultra preset still holds an average of 95 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings average 162 FPS, Medium averages 132 FPS with a minimum of 112 FPS and a maximum of 152 FPS, and High averages 108 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to an average of 68 FPS, which still clears the playable threshold but with less headroom.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes more noticeably. Low settings average 101 FPS, Medium averages 82 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS, and High averages 68 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to an average of 42 FPS, which sits below the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it the only tested configuration that fails to meet that mark.
The data shows a clear scaling pattern: each resolution step down from 4K to 1440p to 1080p yields substantial FPS gains at identical settings. The gap between Low and Ultra widens as resolution increases, with the 4K Ultra preset being the sole outlier that cannot sustain 60 FPS.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?
A: Yes, at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. The Ultra preset averages 95 FPS at 1080p and 68 FPS at 1440p. At 3840x2160, Ultra averages only 42 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best playable setting at 4K resolution?
A: High settings at 3840x2160 is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 68 FPS. Medium and Low also clear the threshold, but High offers the highest visual quality while remaining playable.
Q: How does the Medium preset perform at different resolutions?
A: Medium averages 185 FPS at 1080p, 132 FPS at 1440p, and 82 FPS at 4K. The minimum FPS recorded for Medium is 157 at 1080p, 112 at 1440p, and 70 at 4K.
Q: Is the Ultra preset ever playable on this hardware?
A: Yes, at both 1080p and 1440p. Ultra averages 95 FPS at 1080p and 68 FPS at 1440p. Only at 4K does Ultra fail to reach 60 FPS.
Q: What is the lowest FPS recorded across all tested configurations?
A: The lowest minimum FPS in the dataset is 70 FPS, recorded at 3840x2160 on Medium settings. All other configurations with recorded minimums stay at or above 112 FPS.
Q: How large is the performance gap between Low and Ultra at 4K?
A: Low averages 101 FPS at 4K, while Ultra averages 42 FPS, a difference of 59 FPS. This is the largest settings gap in the recorded data.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 95 FPS. This gives the player full visual fidelity with substantial headroom above the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, Ultra also remains the best choice, averaging 68 FPS. While this is closer to the 60 FPS line, the average still clears it comfortably, and the frame rate does not dip below the threshold based on the recorded data.
At 3840x2160, High is the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher, averaging 68 FPS. Medium and Low also pass the threshold, but High provides the best balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution. The Ultra preset at 4K should be avoided, as its 42 FPS average falls well short of playable.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 2009 out of 3716 tested combinations for Downfall. This places the combo in the upper portion of the database, roughly in the 54th percentile of tested systems. The ranking reflects a configuration that is neither near the top nor near the bottom, but rather solidly mid-pack with enough capability to handle the game at high settings across most resolutions.
The CPU contributes a percentile of 71 against all tested processors, while the GPU sits at a percentile of 61 against all tested graphics cards. The overall combo ranking of 2009 out of 3716 suggests that the pairing works well for this title, with the CPU being the relatively stronger component in the duo. The data indicates that the RTX 4060 is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate drops below playable, but the i5-11400F provides sufficient processing power to avoid CPU bottlenecks at lower resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i5-11400F performs within a narrow band of comparable processors. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17120 in average benchmarks, just 0.3% lower than the i5-11400F's 17177. The Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17239, a 0.4% advantage. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17278, 0.6% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17074, 0.6% lower. All four alternatives fall within a roughly 1% performance envelope, meaning any of them would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Downfall when paired with the same GPU.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, just 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, 0.5% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509, 0.7% lower. These GPU rivals are all within 1% of the RTX 4060's average score, so systems built with any of these cards would produce comparable FPS results in Downfall, assuming the CPU remains the same.
The practical takeaway from the rival data is that small benchmark deltas below 1% translate to imperceptible differences in actual gameplay. A user with a system based on any of these CPUs or GPUs would see essentially the same performance profile as the i5-11400F and RTX 4060 combination.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i5-11400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 can run Downfall with strong results. At 1920x1080, every preset including Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 95 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra again remains playable at 68 FPS average, and all lower presets exceed 100 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system maintains 60 FPS on High, Medium, and Low settings, with High being the best playable option at 68 FPS average.
The only configuration that fails the 60 FPS test is 4K Ultra, which averages 42 FPS. For users targeting 4K, the recommendation is to use High settings, which still delivers a smooth experience. For 1440p and below, the Ultra preset is fully viable, and the system has enough headroom that even demanding scenes should hold close to the recorded averages.
The data shows a well-balanced pairing for this horror title. The CPU's 71st percentile standing and the GPU's 61st percentile standing combine to place this combo in the upper half of all tested systems. The recorded frame rates confirm that the i5-11400F does not bottleneck the RTX 4060 in Downfall, since the GPU becomes the limiting factor only at 4K Ultra. Overall, this system delivers playable performance across nearly all tested configurations, with the sole exception being the most extreme settings at 4K.