Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

45%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
210 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
88 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
150 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
63 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
93 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
39 FPS
7.1ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 13,494
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 16,014

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 39 63 76 93
1440p QHD 63 101 123 150
1080p Full HD 88 141 172 210

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 141
1920x1080 Low 210
1920x1080 Medium 172
1920x1080 Ultra 88
2560x1440 High 101
2560x1440 Low 150
2560x1440 Medium 123
2560x1440 Ultra 63
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Low 93
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 Ultra 39

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a surprisingly strong performance profile for Downfall, a horror title from 2016. The benchmark data shows this combination handles the game well across most modern resolutions, with the key limitation appearing only at 4K with the Ultra preset. The measured frame rates indicate a system that is well-balanced for this specific game, though the GPU is clearly the dominant factor in determining playable settings at higher resolutions. The following analysis breaks down the exact performance figures, component roles, and ranking data to provide a clear picture of what this PC can achieve.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, delivering an average of 88 FPS. This leaves significant headroom, as the engine can push much further with lower presets: High settings yield 141 FPS, Medium hits 172 FPS (with a minimum of 146 and maximum of 198), and Low reaches 210 FPS. The 60 FPS threshold is not just met but exceeded by nearly 50% at the highest preset, making this resolution entirely unrestricted by settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the same Ultra preset remains the best playable option, with an average of 63 FPS. This is a tighter margin than at 1080p, but still comfortably above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The other presets show clear scaling: High runs at 101 FPS, Medium at 123 FPS (with 104 minimum and 141 maximum), and Low at 150 FPS. Ultra at 1440p is the boundary where the hardware starts to show its limits, but it remains fully playable.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Ultra preset drops to 39 FPS, falling well below the 60 FPS threshold and therefore not playable. The best playable settings at 4K are High, which averages 63 FPS. Medium is also playable at 76 FPS (with 65 minimum and 88 maximum), and Low runs at 93 FPS. This means at 4K, you must step down from Ultra to High to maintain the 60 FPS target, but the image quality remains respectable.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows a clear scaling pattern where both the CPU and GPU contribute differently depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the performance spread from Low to Ultra shows a 210 FPS to 88 FPS range, which is a 58% drop. This substantial reduction with higher settings indicates that the GPU is heavily involved in the rendering pipeline, but the low-end settings still produce very high frame rates, suggesting the CPU is not holding back the system at these high FPS numbers.

At 2560x1440, the spread from Low (150 FPS) to Ultra (63 FPS) is a 58% decrease, similar in proportion to 1080p. This consistency implies that the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling with settings, and the CPU maintains its ability to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck, even at the lower settings where frame rates are high.

At 3840x2160, the pattern shifts differently. The reduction from Low (93 FPS) to Ultra (39 FPS) is a 58% decrease, again matching the lower resolutions. However, the absolute frame rates at 4K are much lower across the board. The fact that the frame rate at 4K Low is 93 FPS on 1080p Ultra's 88 FPS suggests that the GPU is the primary performance driver in this configuration. The CPU's role becomes more passive at higher resolutions, as the workload shifts heavily to the GPU, but the i3-12100F still delivers enough per-core performance to keep up in this 2016 title.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 2185 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the 58.8th percentile of all configurations tested. This rank indicates that the combo is slightly above the median performance for this game, which makes sense given that the GPU falls into the 59th percentile of all GPUs and the CPU into the 68th percentile of all CPUs. The rank data shows this is a mid-tier pairing for this title, not a top-tier one, but it is enough to play the game at high settings, as seen in the measured FPS.

The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's moderate capability. The game is not particularly demanding for modern hardware, so the limiting factor is largely the GPU's ability to render at high resolutions with Ultra settings. However, the CPU's 68th percentile placement means it is above average, which helps support high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core 3 N355 has an average benchmark score of 13492, which is a 0% delta from the i3-12100F's score. This means the Core 3 N355 would behave virtually identically in game performance, making it a direct alternative. The Intel Core i5-9500 is also close, with a score of 13452 and a 0.3% delta, so it is slightly slower but still within a negligible margin. On the other side, the Intel Core 5 120UL scores 13594 ( -0.7% delta, meaning it is slightly faster), and the Intel Core i7-1250U scores 13351 (1% slower). For practical purposes, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly the same experience in Downfall as the i3-12100F.

On the GPU side, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, with an average score of 16129 against the RX 9060's 16014, a -0.7% delta. The RTX 3060 Ti would perform almost exactly the same in this game. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862 with a 1% delta, making it a slightly slower alternative but still close. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 also scores 15852 with a 1% delta, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679 with a 2.1% delta is the slowest of the group, but all four would be within a few percent of the RX 9060's performance. Choosing any of these GPUs with the i3-12100F would result in a similar experience in Downfall.

FAQ

Q: What is the best setting for 4K gaming with this combo?

A: The best playable setting at 3840x2160 is High, which achieves an average of 63 FPS. The Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold at 39 FPS and is not playable.

Q: Can this PC handle Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, at 2560x1440 Ultra settings run at an average of 63 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13494, while its closest rival, the Intel Core 3 N355, has a score of 13492, a 0% delta. The performance is effectively identical.

Q: What is the minimum FPS at 1080p Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 172, with a minimum of 146 FPS and a maximum of 198 FPS.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more important for this game at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate drops from 93 FPS at Low to 39 FPS at Ultra, which is a 58% reduction, indicating the GPU's rendering load is the primary effect on performance.

Q: What is the game's rank among all tested combinations?

A: This CPU and GPU combo ranks 2185 out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the 58.8th percentile.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 9060 can absolutely run Downfall in a playable state. The benchmark data confirms that at 1920x1080, every preset, including Ultra, stays above the 60 FPS playability threshold, with Ultra averaging 88 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same is true, but Ultra is the only preset that just barely clears the threshold at 63 FPS, making it playable. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset fails to reach 60 FPS with a 39 FPS average, but High settings succeed at 63 FPS. Therefore, the verdict is that this PC can play the game at 1080p and 1440p without compromises, while at 4K it requires a settings drop from Ultra to High. The data shows this is a solid match for the game, with the GPU being the determining factor for high-resolution performance.