Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 72 | 87 | 107 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 115 | 140 | 171 |
| 1080p Full HD | 101 | 161 | 196 | 240 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a highly capable 60 FPS experience across all tested resolutions in Downfall, though the margin of headroom varies sharply depending on the settings and pixel count. At 4K, the combo maintains playable frame rates through Medium and High settings, but drops below the 60 FPS threshold at Ultra. At 1440p and 1080p, every preset including Ultra clears the 60 FPS bar, making this a versatile build for the horror title. The data indicates the GPU is the primary performance driver at higher resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions and high frame rates.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, producing an average of 72 FPS. The Medium preset also qualifies at 87 FPS, but High is the better visual choice since it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset falls short at 45 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. The Low preset runs at 107 FPS, but is not the "best" because High achieves the same playability with superior graphics quality.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 72 FPS. This is notable because the same preset at 4K drops to 45 FPS, showing how resolution scaling affects the GPU load. All four presets — Low (171 FPS), Medium (140 FPS), High (115 FPS), and Ultra (72 FPS) — clear the 60 FPS threshold, so the choice is purely about visual preference. Ultra is the most demanding option that remains playable.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are also Ultra, delivering 101 FPS on average. This is the highest visual quality available in the game, and the combo still provides a substantial cushion above 60 FPS. The lower presets run even faster: High at 161 FPS, Medium at 196 FPS, and Low at 240 FPS. The 1080p Ultra result of 101 FPS mirrors the 1440p Ultra result of 72 FPS in terms of playability, but with more headroom at the lower resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data shows a clear shift in component importance as resolution changes. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor. Moving from Low to Ultra at 4K, the average FPS drops from 107 to 45, a reduction of 62 FPS. This steep decline indicates the Radeon RX 7700's rendering workload scales heavily with settings, while the Core i3-12100F has enough headroom to feed the GPU at these frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the pattern is similar but less extreme. The spread from Low (171 FPS) to Ultra (72 FPS) is 99 FPS, showing that the GPU still governs performance. However, the fact that Ultra stays at 72 FPS suggests the CPU is not yet a bottleneck at this resolution. The i3-12100F, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, can sustain these frame rates without limiting the GPU.
At 1920x1080, the CPU begins to play a more significant role. The Low preset reaches 240 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that demands strong single-thread performance from the processor. The i3-12100F's single-core score of 893 in 3dmark and 3444 in Passmark supports this capability. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 139 FPS (from 240 to 101), which is larger in absolute terms than at 1440p, indicating that the GPU is still the main variable, but the CPU's ability to push 240 FPS at Low shows it is not a limiting factor even at extreme frame rates.
Benchmark data reinforces this split. The CPU's percentile rank of 68 among all CPUs and its multi-threaded scores (11860 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) suggest it can handle the game's logic and draw calls. The GPU's percentile rank of 58 among all GPUs and its Passmark G3D score of 20974 indicate strong rasterization performance. In practice, the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K and 1440p, while the CPU is sufficient at all resolutions tested.
Measured FPS Breakdown
3840x2160: The Ultra preset averages 45 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and thus not playable. Medium averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS — the only 4K setting with min/max data. High averages 72 FPS with no min/max recorded. Low averages 107 FPS. All presets except Ultra are playable at 4K.
2560x1440: Ultra averages 72 FPS, High averages 115 FPS, Medium averages 140 FPS with a minimum of 119 FPS and a maximum of 161 FPS, and Low averages 171 FPS. Every preset at this resolution stays above 60 FPS, with the minimum recorded value being 119 FPS on Medium, which is well above the threshold.
1920x1080: Ultra averages 101 FPS, High averages 161 FPS, Medium averages 196 FPS with a minimum of 167 FPS and a maximum of 226 FPS, and Low averages 240 FPS. All presets are playable, and even the lowest minimum (167 FPS on Medium) far exceeds the 60 FPS requirement.
The min/max data is sparse, appearing only for the Medium preset at each resolution. This limits the analysis of frame time consistency, but the available figures show no dips below 74 FPS at 4K, 119 FPS at 1440p, or 167 FPS at 1080p. The average FPS values are consistent with a smooth experience, as the lowest recorded average across all playable settings is 72 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Core 3 N355 (delta 0%), the Intel Core i5-9500 (delta 0.3%), the Intel Core 5 120UL (delta -0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-1250U (delta 1.1%). These processors have nearly identical average scores to the i3-12100F's 13494, meaning a system with any of these would likely produce similar frame rates in Downfall, provided the GPU remains the same. The i5-9500 is a slightly older desktop part, while the i7-1250U is a mobile chip, but their benchmark parity suggests the game's performance would be comparable.
The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 370X (delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (delta -1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (delta 1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (delta -1.7%). The R9 370X is an older card with a nearly identical average score (15862 vs 15852), but its architecture is much older, so real-world game performance could differ despite the benchmark parity. The RTX 3060 Ti is the most relevant rival, as it is a modern mid-range card that would likely deliver similar FPS in Downfall. The RX 9060 and Pro W5500 are also within 1.1% of the RX 7700's score, indicating they would perform almost identically.
For this specific combo, swapping the CPU for any of its rivals or the GPU for any of its rivals would produce a system with essentially the same benchmark profile. The deltas are all within 1.7%, which is within the margin of measurement error for synthetic tests. Users with these alternative parts should expect the same playability verdicts: 4K Ultra would remain unplayable, while 1440p and 1080p Ultra would stay above 60 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
This combination ranks 1735 out of 3716 tested configurations in Downfall, placing it in the upper half of all tested combos. The rank is based on measured FPS data across the three resolutions and four settings, and the percentile position reflects the fact that the system can run the game at 60 FPS in most scenarios but struggles with 4K Ultra. The GPU's percentile rank of 58 and the CPU's percentile rank of 68 both sit above the median, so the combo is well-balanced, with the GPU being the slightly weaker link.
The rank of 1735 out of 3716 means roughly 53% of tested combos perform better, but this does not indicate a weak system. Many higher-ranked combos likely include more powerful CPUs or GPUs, but the i3-12100F and RX 7700 still deliver playable performance at 1440p and 1080p with maximum settings. The rank is informative for comparing against other builds, but the practical takeaway is that this PC handles Downfall well for the vast majority of gaming scenarios.
The Verdict
This PC can run Downfall, and it does so with considerable ease at most settings. According to the verdict data, at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with the best setting being High at 72 FPS average. Ultra is the only non-playable preset at 4K, falling to 45 FPS.
At 2560x1440, all four settings — High, Low, Medium, and Ultra — are playable, with Ultra being the best at 72 FPS. The verdict confirms that 1440p Ultra is a viable option, which is a strong result for a horror game that benefits from high detail.
At 1920x1080, all settings are playable, and the best is Ultra at 101 FPS. This is the optimal experience for this combo, providing maximum visual quality with a 41 FPS cushion above the 60 FPS threshold. The system is fully capable of running Downfall at 1080p with every setting maxed out, and it also handles 1440p Ultra. Only 4K Ultra is beyond its reach, requiring a reduction to High or Medium for a smooth experience.
FAQ
Q: What is the best setting for 4K on this system?
A: High settings at 3840x2160, which averages 72 FPS. Medium also works at 87 FPS, but High offers better visuals while staying above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra drops to 45 FPS and is not playable.
Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 1440p with max settings?
A: Yes, Ultra at 2560x1440 averages 72 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All other presets at this resolution also exceed 60 FPS, with Low at 171 FPS and Medium at 140 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is more involved because frame rates reach up to 240 FPS on Low settings. The Core i3-12100F's single-thread performance (893 in 3dmark single-thread, 3444 in Passmark) is sufficient, as even Ultra stays at 101 FPS without a CPU bottleneck.
Q: Is there a preset that dips below 60 FPS on this system?
A: Only 4K Ultra, with an average of 45 FPS. The recorded minimum values for Medium presets are 74 FPS at 4K, 119 FPS at 1440p, and 167 FPS at 1080p, all well above 60 FPS.
Q: How does this combo compare to similar hardware?
A: The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-9500 (0.3% difference), and the GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (-1.7% difference). These parts would produce nearly identical frame rates in Downfall.
Q: What is the overall ranking of this combination?
A: It ranks 1735 out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the upper half of all configurations. The system is well-balanced, with the GPU's 58th percentile and CPU's 68th percentile both above the median.