Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
315 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
133 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
225 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
91 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
140 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
61 FPS
4.7ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 51,947
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 37,648

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 61 94 113 140
1440p QHD 91 150 182 225
1080p Full HD 133 211 257 315

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 211
1920x1080 Low 315
1920x1080 Medium 257
1920x1080 Ultra 133
2560x1440 High 150
2560x1440 Low 225
2560x1440 Medium 182
2560x1440 Ultra 91
3840x2160 High 94
3840x2160 Low 140
3840x2160 Medium 113
3840x2160 Ultra 61

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

Can the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X combined with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 run the horror title Downfall? Benchmark data indicates a definitive yes, with this combination delivering a smooth experience across all tested resolutions and presets. The measured FPS figures show that the system not only meets the 60 FPS playability threshold in every configuration tested but often exceeds it by a substantial margin, making it a high-performance option for this game. The data shows the strongest performance at 1920x1080, where even the most demanding "Ultra" preset achieves an average of 132.5 FPS, while the 4K "Ultra" setting remains comfortably above the target at 60.6 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured performance data for this CPU-GPU combination reveals a clear hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional frame rates that will easily satisfy high-refresh-rate monitor owners. The "Low" preset achieves an average of 314.5 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. Moving up the quality ladder, "Medium" produces 257.1 FPS, and "High" still manages a very strong 211.4 FPS. The most demanding "Ultra" preset at this resolution yields an average of 132.5 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS playability threshold, indicating that the CPU and GPU have significant headroom to spare.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains impressive, though the increased pixel count begins to show its effect. The "Low" preset delivers 225.3 FPS, followed by "Medium" at 182.3 FPS and "High" at 150.4 FPS. The "Ultra" preset at this resolution produces an average of 90.8 FPS, which is still well above the target and provides a fluid experience for most displays. The scaling from "Low" to "Ultra" at 1440p shows a reduction of approximately 60%, but the absolute numbers remain high enough that users can prioritize visual fidelity without concern.

At 3840x2160, the system continues to deliver playable frame rates across all settings. The "Low" preset achieves 140.2 FPS, "Medium" drops to 113 FPS, and "High" produces 93.8 FPS. The "Ultra" preset at 4K is the most demanding configuration in the dataset, and it still manages an average of 60.6 FPS, just narrowly clearing the 60 FPS threshold. This demonstrates that the RTX 4070 has enough graphics horsepower to handle 4K gaming in Downfall, although this is the only configuration where the system does not have a large margin of error above the playability limit. The data does not include separate minimum or maximum frame time readings, so the analysis relies on average FPS figures, which indicate consistent performance across all tested scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this system in Downfall?

A: The maximum average frame rate observed in the dataset is 314.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the "Low" preset.

Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution with the "Ultra" preset?

A: Yes, the benchmark data shows an average of 60.6 FPS at 3840x2160 with "Ultra" settings, which is just above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does performance scale from 1080p to 4K at the "High" preset?

A: The average frame rate drops from 211.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 150.4 FPS at 2560x1440, and then to 93.8 FPS at 3840x2160, showing a steady decline as resolution increases.

Q: What is the performance difference between the "Low" and "Ultra" presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the "Low" preset achieves 225.3 FPS, while the "Ultra" preset produces 90.8 FPS, indicating that the "Ultra" settings are approximately 60% more demanding on the system.

Q: Is the "Ultra" preset always the best choice for visual quality?

A: According to the verdictByResolution data, "Ultra" is listed as the best settings at every resolution, achieving 132.5 FPS at 1080p, 90.8 FPS at 1440p, and 60.6 FPS at 4K.

Q: How does the system's overall ranking compare in the benchmark database?

A: The system ranks 836 out of 3716 total combinations tested for this game, placing it in the top quarter of all configurations.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance characteristics observed in Downfall suggest a balanced workload between the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, with the GPU becoming more dominant as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the high frame rates, particularly the 314.5 FPS on "Low" settings, indicate that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The Ryzen 9 5950X, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, provides ample processing power for game logic and draw calls, as evidenced by its strong benchmark scores such as 26017 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 45424 in Passmark multithread. The single-thread performance is also solid, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2083, which is crucial for games that rely heavily on a few primary threads.

As the resolution increases to 2560x1440 and then to 3840x2160, the rendering load shifts more heavily onto the GPU. The RTX 4070, with 5888 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, handles the increased pixel count efficiently. The performance drop from 1080p to 4K at the "Ultra" preset is substantial, from 132.5 FPS down to 60.6 FPS, which is a clear sign that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 26927 and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3854 indicate a powerful graphics processor that is well-suited for 4K gaming, but the data shows that it cannot maintain the same frame rates as at lower resolutions.

The scaling between presets also highlights the GPU's role. At 4K, moving from "Low" to "Ultra" reduces performance from 140.2 FPS to 60.6 FPS, a drop of over 56%, which is consistent with the increased shading and texture work demanded by higher settings. In contrast, the CPU's influence is more apparent at lower resolutions where the frame rates are extremely high. At 1080p "Low," the 314.5 FPS result shows that the CPU is not holding back the GPU, and the system is capable of delivering performance that exceeds what most displays can show. The data suggests that for Downfall, the RTX 4070 is the primary driver of performance at 1440p and 4K, while the Ryzen 9 5950X provides a solid foundation that does not introduce stutters or frame drops.

The Verdict

The benchmark results are unambiguous: this PC can run Downfall at playable frame rates in every configuration tested. The verdictByResolution data confirms that all four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at each of the three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels with an "Ultra" preset average of 132.5 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. At 2560x1440, the "Ultra" preset achieves 90.8 FPS, providing a smooth experience on 1440p monitors with high visual quality. At 3840x2160, the "Ultra" preset just clears the threshold with 60.6 FPS, making 4K gaming possible, though users should be aware that there is minimal headroom for frame rate dips.

For users prioritizing a locked 60 FPS experience at 4K, the "Ultra" preset is viable, but the "High" preset at 93.8 FPS offers a more comfortable margin and still delivers excellent visual fidelity. At 1440p and 1080p, the system has enough performance to run "Ultra" settings without any concerns about dropping below 60 FPS. The data indicates that this hardware combination is not just capable but overqualified for Downfall, as even the most demanding settings at the highest resolution remain playable. The ranking of 836 out of 3716 combinations further supports the conclusion that this is a strong performer for this title.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for both components provides context for how other hardware might perform in this game. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 51947, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX, with an average score of 52073, which is a negligible 0.2% difference. This means that a system with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Downfall, as the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at most settings. Similarly, the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121, just 0.3% higher, and the Intel Core i7-14700 scores 52301, which is 0.7% higher, indicating that all of these processors would deliver comparable performance in this game.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has an average score of 37648 and sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4, which scores 37628, a difference of only 0.1%, meaning it would perform almost identically. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 37507, which is 0.4% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher. These small deltas suggest that swapping the RTX 4070 for any of these alternatives would result in very similar frame rates in Downfall, though the desktop RTX 4070 has the advantage of a higher power envelope and dedicated cooling compared to the mobile variant. The AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, which is 1.3% lower, and would still likely maintain playable frame rates but with a slightly reduced performance margin.

Best Settings per Resolution

The optimal settings for this system prioritize the highest visual quality while maintaining an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the "Ultra" preset is the clear choice, delivering 132.5 FPS. This provides a substantial buffer above the threshold, ensuring smooth gameplay even in scenes with heavy effects or multiple enemies. At 2560x1440, the "Ultra" preset remains the best option, achieving 90.8 FPS. This is comfortably above the 60 FPS target, allowing users to enjoy the full visual experience without compromise. At 3840x2160, the "Ultra" preset produces 60.6 FPS, which is just above the threshold. While this is technically the best setting per the verdict data, users who prefer a more consistent frame rate might opt for the "High" preset at 93.8 FPS, which offers a significant performance increase with only a minor reduction in visual quality. The data shows that the system can handle the maximum settings at all resolutions, making the choice a matter of personal preference for frame rate stability versus absolute graphical fidelity.