Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 70 | 90 | 104 |
| 1440p QHD | 73 | 114 | 141 | 171 |
| 1080p Full HD | 100 | 162 | 197 | 238 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination delivers a strong showing in Downfall, a horror title from 2016. Measured data places this pairing at rank 1802 out of 3716 tested combos, positioning it firmly in the upper half of all configurations. The benchmark results indicate that this system provides a smooth experience at most settings, with the only notable exception being the Ultra preset at 4K resolution, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and RTX 5060 achieves a combo rank of 1802 out of 3716 tested combinations in Downfall. This places the pairing in the 48.5th percentile of all tested combos, meaning it outperforms slightly more than half of all configurations tested. While this is not a top-tier ranking, context matters significantly: the game is a horror title from 2016, and the data shows the combo clears the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution except for the single most demanding preset.
The ranking reflects a balanced system rather than an extreme one. The CPU alone sits at the 87th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39768. The GPU, meanwhile, holds the 72nd percentile versus all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 26331. The gap between these percentile positions suggests the GPU is the more limiting factor in this pairing for Downfall, a pattern that becomes clearer when examining resolution scaling in later sections. The combo rank of 1802, being lower than either individual component percentile, indicates that the game's demands do not fully saturate the CPU's capabilities, leaving the GPU as the primary driver of performance differences.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Examining the nearest rivals for each component reveals what other hardware would behave similarly in this system. For the CPU, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's average benchmark score of 39768 sits extremely close to several alternatives. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 39603, a delta of just 0.4 percent, making it the closest match. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485, within 0.7 percent. On the other side, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048, a 0.7 percent deficit from the 9800X3D's position, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 scores 40081, just 0.8 percent higher. These deltas are all under one percent, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Downfall when paired with the same GPU.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5060's average benchmark score of 26331 has similarly close competitors. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, a 0.3 percent difference. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, also 0.3 percent off. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, within 0.8 percent, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 26011, sitting 1.2 percent lower. These tight margins mean that swapping the RTX 5060 for any of these four GPUs would yield virtually indistinguishable performance in this game, provided the CPU remains constant. The data suggests that users with any of these alternative components should expect similar Downfall experiences, with differences of only a few frames per second at most.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Ryzen 7 9800X3D and the RTX 5060 in Downfall becomes clear when examining how frame rates scale across resolutions and presets. The CPU's benchmark profile shows exceptional multithreaded capability, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23230 and a single-core score of 2080. The GPU, meanwhile, delivers a Passmark G3D score of 20891. For a 2016 horror game, the CPU's headroom is substantial, and the data indicates that the processor is rarely the bottleneck.
This becomes evident when looking at the performance scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K. At 1080p Low settings, the combo produces 238.4 FPS. At 1440p Low, that drops to 171.4 FPS, a 28 percent reduction. At 4K Low, the frame rate falls to 103.7 FPS, another 40 percent drop. This consistent scaling with resolution points to the GPU as the limiting factor: as pixel count increases, the GPU must work harder while the CPU's workload remains relatively constant. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads running at a base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost of 5.20 GHz, has ample capacity to feed the GPU at all resolutions.
The preset scaling further confirms this. At 1080p, moving from Low to Medium reduces performance from 238.4 to 197.4 FPS. From Medium to High, the drop is to 162.2 FPS. From High to Ultra, the fall is to 100.1 FPS. The total reduction from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 58 percent. At 4K, the same preset progression goes from 103.7 to 89.7 to 69.9 to 45.1 FPS, a 57 percent total reduction. The similarity in percentage drops across resolutions indicates that presets affect both components proportionally, but the absolute frame rates at 4K Ultra reveal the GPU's limits. The RTX 5060's 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth appears sufficient for most settings, but the 4K Ultra preset's demands exceed what the card can deliver at 60 FPS.
The Verdict
The measured data provides a clear answer to whether this PC can run Downfall: yes, at every resolution except for the single most demanding configuration. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best playable preset at 69.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to 45.1 FPS, below the 60 FPS playability threshold. At 2560x1440, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra achieving 72.6 FPS as the best setting. At 1920x1080, the entire range of presets is playable, and Ultra delivers 100.1 FPS.
The verdict by resolution is straightforward. For 4K users, stick to High settings for a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. For 1440p and 1080p users, the Ultra preset is fully playable, with 1440p offering a 21 percent margin over the threshold and 1080p offering a 67 percent margin. The data shows no stutter-prone configurations: every playable preset exceeds 60 FPS by at least 9.9 FPS, and the lowest playable result is 69.9 FPS at 4K High. This system can run the game smoothly across virtually all settings, with the only caveat being the 4K Ultra preset.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four presets, providing a total of twelve data points. At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces an average of 238.4 FPS, Medium produces 197.4 FPS, High produces 162.2 FPS, and Ultra produces 100.1 FPS. These figures represent the highest performance tier in the dataset, with even the most demanding preset nearly doubling the 60 FPS threshold.
At 2560x1440, performance scales down proportionally. The Low preset averages 171.4 FPS, Medium averages 141 FPS, High averages 113.9 FPS, and Ultra averages 72.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution maintains a 21 percent margin above the playability threshold, making it a viable option for users with 1440p displays.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates show the GPU's limits more clearly. The Low preset averages 103.7 FPS, Medium averages 89.7 FPS, and High averages 69.9 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 45.1 FPS, a 25 percent deficit below the 60 FPS threshold. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to meet playability standards. Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: each step up in preset costs roughly 15-20 percent performance, and each step up in resolution costs roughly 30-40 percent performance. The min and max FPS values are not available in the data, so the analysis relies on average frame rates.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes, at High, Medium, and Low settings. The High preset averages 69.9 FPS, Medium averages 89.7 FPS, and Low averages 103.7 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K falls short at 45.1 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?
A: The Ultra preset is playable at 2560x1440, achieving an average of 72.6 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that clears the 60 FPS threshold at this resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in this game?
A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, while the RX 6750 XT scores 26011, a 1.2 percent difference. In Downfall, this translates to nearly identical frame rates.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9800X3D a bottleneck for the RTX 5060?
A: The data shows the CPU at the 87th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile. The consistent performance scaling with resolution indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, not the CPU.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p Ultra settings?
A: The 1080p Ultra preset averages 100.1 FPS, which is 67 percent above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: Are there any settings that fall below 60 FPS?
A: Only one configuration in the dataset falls below 60 FPS: 4K Ultra at 45.1 FPS. All other eleven measured configurations exceed the threshold.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, which delivers an average of 69.9 FPS. This provides a 16.5 percent margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The Low and Medium presets also work at this resolution, offering 103.7 and 89.7 FPS respectively, but High represents the optimal balance of visual quality and performance.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, averaging 72.6 FPS. This exceeds the playability threshold by 21 percent. All four presets are playable at this resolution, but Ultra provides the highest visual fidelity while maintaining a comfortable frame rate cushion.
For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 100.1 FPS, making it the best setting by a wide margin. This is 67 percent above the 60 FPS threshold, leaving substantial headroom for any demanding scenes the horror game might present. The data shows no reason to compromise on settings at 1080p, as even the most demanding preset delivers triple-digit frame rates.