Downfall

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a surprisingly robust performance profile in Downfall, a horror title from 2016. The benchmark data shows that this pairing is not only capable of running the game smoothly at 1080p and 1440p, but it also manages to clear the 60 FPS threshold at 4K with High settings. The data indicates a system that scales well across presets, though it does hit a hard wall at the Ultra preset in 4K, where frame rates drop below playable levels.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this PC in Downfall?*

A: According to the verdict data, the best playable settings at 3840x2160 are High, achieving an average of 68 FPS. At both 2560x1440 and 1920x1080, the system can handle the Ultra preset, with average frame rates of 68 FPS and 95 FPS respectively.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, the data shows it can. At 3840x2160, the average FPS for High, Medium, and Low settings are 68, 82, and 101 respectively, all of which are above the 60 FPS playable threshold. However, the Ultra preset at this resolution falls to 42 FPS, which is not playable.

*Q: How does this PC compare to other tested combinations in Downfall?*

A: The combination ranks 2009 out of 3716 tested combos in the game. This places it in the middle of the pack, indicating a solid, mid-range performance level for this specific title.

*Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for performance in Downfall?*

A: The benchmark results suggest the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions and presets. The frame rates drop significantly when moving from Medium to Ultra at 4K (from 82 to 42 FPS), while the CPU's high single-thread score of 4691 in Passmark indicates it is less likely to be the limiting factor.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded?

A: The measured FPS data only provides min and max values for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the system recorded a minimum of 157 FPS and a maximum of 213 FPS. At 2560x1440, it recorded 112 FPS minimum and 152 FPS maximum, and at 3840x2160, it recorded 70 FPS minimum and 95 FPS maximum.

Q: Does this CPU and GPU combination have any known performance rivals?

A: In terms of CPU benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a close rival to the Intel Core i7-14700KF, with a negligible performance delta of -0.2%. For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060's average benchmark score is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 7790, with a delta of -0.2%.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance data from Downfall reveals a clear division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. At lower resolutions, the game appears to be heavily CPU-bound, given the extremely high frame rates. For instance, at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 226 FPS. This high ceiling is supported by the CPU's strong Passmark single-thread score of 4691 and its multi-thread score of 36470, which place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The CPU’s high boost clock of 5.50 GHz and 8 cores/16 threads provide ample headroom to feed the GPU.

As the resolution increases, the workload shifts to the GPU. The RTX 4060, with its 3072 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, becomes the limiting factor. This is evident when comparing the scaling from 1440p to 4K. At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 68. When jumping to 3840x2160 with the same Ultra preset, the average FPS plummets to 42, a 38% decrease. This steep drop indicates that the GPU’s pixel throughput and memory bandwidth (272.0 GB/s) are insufficient to handle the massive pixel count of 4K at the highest settings. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19545, which places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, confirms its mid-range standing.

The presets also tell a story. At 4K, the difference between Low and High settings is a 33 FPS gap (101 vs 68 FPS), while the difference between High and Ultra is a 26 FPS drop (68 vs 42 FPS). This suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are disproportionately expensive for the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. Conversely, at 1080p, the system can brute-force its way through any setting, with the Ultra preset still achieving a 95 FPS average. The data shows that for this game, the CPU is more than capable at all resolutions, while the GPU’s performance dictates the playable settings ceiling, especially at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the system's performance across three resolutions and four presets.

1920x1080: This is the resolution where the combination shines brightest. The Low preset yields an average of 226 FPS, showcasing the system's raw power. The Medium preset averages 185 FPS, with a minimum of 157 and a maximum of 213 FPS, indicating very consistent frame pacing. The High preset delivers an average of 152 FPS, and the Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still maintains a smooth 95 FPS average. All presets far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold here.

2560x1440: Performance remains strong at 1440p, though the frame rates naturally decrease. The Low preset averages 162 FPS. The Medium preset averages 132 FPS, with a minimum of 112 and a maximum of 152 FPS. The High preset drops to an average of 108 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, but it still manages to stay above the playable threshold with a 68 FPS average. This makes 1440p Ultra a viable option for a smooth experience.

3840x2160: This is where the limits of the RTX 4060 become apparent. The Low preset is very playable, averaging 101 FPS. The Medium preset averages 82 FPS, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95 FPS, which is still solidly above 60 FPS. The High preset also clears the threshold with an average of 68 FPS. However, the Ultra preset is a different story, dropping to an average of 42 FPS. This is the only preset tested in the data that fails to meet the playable threshold, making it unsuitable for a smooth experience at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Downfall, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a rank of 2009 out of 3716 total combinations. This places it in the 54th percentile, meaning it performs better than just over half of all tested systems. This is a respectable mid-table position, reflecting the balance between the strong CPU and the mid-range GPU.

Looking at the individual components, the CPU is a clear high-performer. Its average benchmark score of 69996 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs tested. This high percentile is corroborated by its performance against its nearest rivals; it trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% faster), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.2% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% faster). This indicates the Ryzen 7 9700F is a top-tier processor that won't be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

The GPU, on the other hand, is more of a middle-of-the-pack performer. Its average benchmark score of 17639 puts it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon HD 7790, AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Radeon Pro 560, and AMD Radeon Pro 460, with all performance deltas being under 1%. This suggests that while the RTX 4060 is a capable card, its raw compute performance is not exceptional when compared to the broader GPU market, which explains the system's mid-pack ranking in Downfall.

The Verdict

Can this PC run Downfall? Absolutely. The verdict by resolution is clear and definitive. At 1920x1080, the system is not just playable, but exceptionally smooth, with all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset achieves a 95 FPS average, providing a premium experience.

At 2560x1440, the system also receives a full pass. All four presets maintain an average FPS above 60. Even the most demanding Ultra preset holds a 68 FPS average, meaning users can enjoy the game's highest visual fidelity at this resolution without compromising on smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The system can run the game at 4K, but not at every setting. The High, Medium, and Low presets all average above 60 FPS, with High being the best playable setting at 68 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, fails the playability test, dropping to a 42 FPS average. This means that while 4K is achievable, it requires a sacrifice in visual quality to attain a smooth frame rate.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for a 60+ FPS experience are as follows:

3840x2160: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High. This setting yields an average of 68 FPS. While Medium and Low also clear the threshold, High offers the best visual fidelity while maintaining smooth performance. The Ultra preset is not recommended at this resolution, as its 42 FPS average falls below the playable threshold.

2560x1440: The system can handle the Ultra preset here, which is the most demanding option. It achieves an average of 68 FPS, matching the performance of the High preset at 4K. This is the optimal choice for users who want the best possible graphics at 1440p without dipping below 60 FPS.

1920x1080: The most demanding preset, Ultra, is the best choice at this resolution. It delivers a strong average of 95 FPS, ensuring a highly fluid and responsive experience. This allows users to max out all graphical options and enjoy the game at its full visual potential.