Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 18 | 29 | 35 | 43 |
| 1440p QHD | 29 | 46 | 56 | 68 |
| 1080p Full HD | 40 | 64 | 78 | 96 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the Intel Arc B370 presents a specific performance profile in Downfall. The recorded data shows a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics processor, with the CPU having ample headroom for this horror title. The following analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions and presets, interprets the component roles, and provides context against other tested hardware combinations.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results for this combination show a clear hierarchy across the three tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain fluid motion. With High settings, the average FPS is 29. Dropping to Medium yields an average of 35 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 30 and a maximum of 40. Low settings improve the average to 43 FPS. Ultra settings are the most demanding, resulting in an average of 18 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
At 2560x1440, performance becomes more viable but remains limited. The Low preset achieves an average of 68 FPS. The High preset averages 46 FPS, while Medium averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 and a maximum of 64. Ultra settings at this resolution produce an average of 29 FPS, mirroring the 4K High result.
At 1920x1080, the system finds its footing. The Low preset averages 96 FPS. Medium settings deliver an average of 78 FPS, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 90. High settings average 64 FPS. The Ultra preset again proves too heavy, averaging 40 FPS. The data indicates a consistent pattern: the gap between Low and Ultra is substantial at every resolution, and the GPU is the limiting factor in all scenarios.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the recorded data, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS varies by resolution. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The best available result is the Low preset at 43 FPS, but this does not meet the playable standard.
At 2560x1440, the only preset that clears the 60 FPS mark is Low, with an average of 68 FPS. This is the recommended setting for this resolution, as Medium falls short at 56 FPS and High drops further to 46 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the system has more options. The High preset averages 64 FPS, which is the highest quality setting that maintains playability. Medium averages 78 FPS, and Low averages 96 FPS, but High is the best visual quality that still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. For users prioritizing frame rate, the data shows that dropping to Medium provides a 14 FPS improvement, while Low adds another 18 FPS on top of that.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions points to the Intel Arc B370 as the dominant bottleneck in this configuration. The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 7 5700, is a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, and its benchmark scores are substantial. The GPU, however, is an integrated part of a Panther Lake platform, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs.
Looking at the FPS data, the transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings drops the average from 64 to 46 FPS, a reduction of 18 FPS. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at High settings drops the average from 46 to 29 FPS, a further reduction of 17 FPS. This consistent decline with increasing pixel count demonstrates that the GPU is being saturated. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU at all resolutions, but the GPU cannot maintain higher frame rates as the workload increases.
The preset scaling further confirms this. At 2560x1440, dropping from High to Low improves the average from 46 to 68 FPS, a gain of 22 FPS. At 1920x1080, the same preset change improves the average from 64 to 96 FPS, a gain of 32 FPS. The larger gain at the lower resolution indicates that the GPU is less constrained at 1080p and can respond more effectively to reduced graphical loads. The CPU's role is consistent: it provides a stable platform, but it is never the primary factor limiting performance in this game.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3429 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations in the database. The low rank is directly attributable to the GPU's limited performance. The CPU itself is a strong performer, ranking in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, but the GPU's 5th percentile standing drags the entire combo down.
The data suggests that this is a CPU-heavy pairing in a game that does not demand a high-end processor. The Ryzen 7 5700 is overqualified for the graphical workload the Arc B370 can deliver. In the database's ranking, nearly all other tested combinations outperform this one, primarily because they include a more capable graphics solution.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU provide context for what other processors might behave similarly in this system. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER scores 25530, a difference of -0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550, also -0.1% relative to the 5700. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485, a 0.1% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446, a 0.3% difference. These processors are all within a fraction of a percent of each other, meaning swapping the 5700 for any of these would not change the game's performance in any meaningful way, as the GPU remains the limiting factor.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are all significantly older integrated or low-end discrete parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, a -0.2% difference from the Arc B370's 1184. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, a -0.5% difference. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, a -0.7% difference. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, a 1.4% difference. These scores are nearly identical, indicating that the Arc B370 delivers performance comparable to a decade-old low-end graphics card. In practice, any of these alternatives would produce the same FPS results in Downfall as the tested configuration.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 43 on Low settings. Medium averages 35 FPS, and High averages 29 FPS. None of these meet the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best settings preset at 1440p?
A: Low is the only preset that stays above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, with an average of 68 FPS. Medium averages 56 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The Intel Arc B370 has a benchmark score in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 78th percentile. The FPS scales heavily with resolution and preset changes, which is a GPU-bound behavior.
Q: Does the Ultra preset ever hit 60 FPS?
A: No. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 40 FPS. At 2560x1440, it averages 29 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it averages 18 FPS. Ultra is not playable at any resolution with this hardware.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: It ranks 3429 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall, placing it in the bottom 8% of all configurations in the database.
Q: Would a different CPU of similar performance help?
A: No. Processors like the Intel Xeon D-2752TER or AMD Ryzen 5 6600H have average scores within 0.1% of the Ryzen 7 5700. Swapping to any of these would not change the FPS, since the GPU is the performance bottleneck.
The Verdict
This PC can run Downfall, but only under specific conditions. At 3840x2160, it cannot maintain a playable frame rate on any preset. The highest average is 43 FPS on Low, which falls short of the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the system is marginally playable, but only on the Low preset, which achieves an average of 68 FPS. The best experience is at 1920x1080, where the High preset averages 64 FPS, meeting the playable standard while offering better visual quality. Medium and Low also clear the threshold at 78 FPS and 96 FPS, respectively.
The data makes it clear that this is a lower-end gaming configuration. The Ryzen 7 5700 provides strong CPU performance, but the Intel Arc B370 severely limits the system's ability to run Downfall at higher resolutions or with enhanced graphics settings. For a smooth experience, users should target 1080p with High settings or 1440p with Low settings. Pushing beyond these parameters will result in frame rates below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The system is functional for this game, but its ceiling is low, and it ranks in the bottom 8% of all tested combos for Downfall.