Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 37 | 60 | 73 | 89 |
| 1440p QHD | 60 | 96 | 118 | 144 |
| 1080p Full HD | 84 | 135 | 165 | 201 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
Similar Performance Alternatives
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X sits in a tightly contested area of the CPU benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 34260 places it within 0.5% of several nearby processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222, which is 0.1% lower, and the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220, also 0.1% lower. The Intel Core i5-13450HX scores 34333, which is 0.2% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H scores 34083, which is 0.5% lower. For practical purposes, any of these four processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Downfall, assuming the GPU is not the limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 3700X also holds an 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs tested, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 occupies a similar position in the GPU database, with an average benchmark score of 21035 and a 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are a mixed group. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 21153, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237, which is 1.0% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713, which is 1.6% lower. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, which is 1.6% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band, so swapping the RTX 5050 for any of these cards would produce very similar frame rates in most scenarios. The RX 5600 XT is the closest match on the lower side, and the RTX A4000 Mobile is the closest on the higher side.
When pairing the 3700X with any of its CPU rivals, the CPU-related performance in Downfall would be nearly indistinguishable. Likewise, pairing the RTX 5050 with any of its GPU rivals would keep GPU-bound performance within a few percent. The combination of the 3700X and RTX 5050 is therefore a well-balanced pairing, with neither component dramatically outpacing the other in overall benchmark terms.
How This Combo Ranks
The database records this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 2281 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. That places it in the upper portion of all tested pairings, roughly in the 61st percentile of combos. The ranking reflects how the full system performs in this game, not just the individual component scores. A rank of 2281 means there are 1435 tested combos that perform worse, and 2280 that perform better.
This rank is consistent with the component-level percentiles. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile, which is strong, while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile, which is above average but not exceptional. The combo rank lands between those two values, which makes sense because Downfall's performance depends on both parts. The 3700X is clearly not the bottleneck for most settings, as its high percentile suggests it can feed the GPU efficiently. The RTX 5050, while not a top-tier card, is capable enough to push this combo into the upper third of all tested configurations.
For a game released in early 2016, this combo is more than adequate. The rank of 2281 out of 3716 indicates that many newer and more expensive combinations outperform it, but the vast majority of systems tested in the database are either comparable or worse. Players with this combo should expect a smooth experience at most resolutions and settings, with the caveat that the highest preset at 4K will strain the GPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The recorded data for this combo in Downfall covers three resolutions and four settings presets per resolution. All measurements are average frames per second, with some presets also recording minimum and maximum values.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 89 FPS. The Medium preset averages 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS. The High preset averages 60 FPS exactly. The Ultra preset drops to 37 FPS. This pattern shows a steep drop from Medium to High and an even steeper drop to Ultra. The Medium preset at 4K is clearly the best balance, as its minimum of 62 FPS stays above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The High preset averages exactly 60 FPS but has no recorded minimum, so it is borderline. The Ultra preset at 37 FPS is not playable by the database's standard.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 144 FPS. The Medium preset averages 118 FPS, with a minimum of 100 FPS and a maximum of 135 FPS. The High preset averages 96 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 60 FPS exactly. At 1440p, every preset stays at or above the 60 FPS threshold. Even Ultra, which averages exactly 60 FPS, is technically playable, though there is no recorded minimum to confirm consistent frame delivery. The Medium preset's minimum of 100 FPS is comfortable, and the High preset at 96 FPS leaves substantial headroom.
At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 201 FPS. The Medium preset averages 165 FPS, with a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 189 FPS. The High preset averages 135 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 84 FPS. At 1080p, the combo is clearly overqualified for this game. Even the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, maintains an average of 84 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset at 201 FPS suggests the CPU and GPU are not being pushed to their limits, and the frame rate is likely limited by the game engine or the display refresh rate.
The scaling between resolutions is consistent. Moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 29 to 33 percent across presets. Moving from 1440p to 4K reduces frame rates by roughly 38 to 50 percent, with the Ultra preset taking the largest hit. This indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly stressed as resolution rises, while the CPU remains capable throughout.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Downfall at 4K with the High preset?
A: Yes, the High preset at 3840x2160 averages exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playability threshold. However, the Medium preset averages 73 FPS with a minimum of 62 FPS, providing more consistent performance. The Ultra preset at 4K averages only 37 FPS and is not playable.
Q: What is the highest settings preset that stays above 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages exactly 60 FPS, so it meets the threshold. The High preset averages 96 FPS and the Medium preset averages 118 FPS, both with more headroom. The Low preset averages 144 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset reaches 201 FPS, which is very high. The Ultra preset drops to 84 FPS, indicating the GPU is handling the increased graphical load. The CPU, with an 84th percentile ranking, is unlikely to be the limiting factor at any preset at this resolution.
Q: How does this combo compare to other tested combinations?
A: This combo ranks 2281 out of 3716 total tested combinations for Downfall. This places it in the upper portion of the database, meaning it outperforms roughly 39 percent of all tested combos and is beaten by roughly 61 percent.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K gaming with this combo?
A: The best preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. However, the Medium preset averages 73 FPS and has a recorded minimum of 62 FPS, making it the safer choice for consistent performance. The database lists High as the best settings for 4K, with an average of 60 FPS.
Q: Does the RTX 5050 have any near-equal alternatives in terms of performance?
A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 1.6 percent lower, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 0.6 percent higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 1.6 percent higher. All of these would produce very similar frame rates in Downfall.
CPU and GPU Roles
The recorded data shows a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 117 FPS (201 down to 84). At 2560x1440, the difference is 84 FPS (144 down to 60). At 3840x2160, the difference is 52 FPS (89 down to 37). This shrinking delta as resolution rises indicates that the GPU is the primary driver of performance variation. The CPU, with its high single-thread and multi-thread scores, is not the limiting factor at any resolution.
The CPU's benchmark scores support this conclusion. The single-core score of 2656 in Passmark and 204 in Cinebench R15 single-core are solid for a desktop processor. The multi-thread score of 22458 in Passmark and 2092 in Cinebench R15 multi-core are also strong. None of these scores suggest a bottleneck for a game like Downfall, which is a horror title from 2016 and does not require extreme CPU resources by modern standards.
The GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 4K, the Ultra preset drops to 37 FPS, which is less than half of the Low preset's 89 FPS. This steep drop is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of compute and memory bandwidth. The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 128-bit bus, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p but stressed at 4K with high settings. The data confirms this: the Medium preset at 4K has a minimum of 62 FPS, while the High preset averages exactly 60 FPS, and Ultra falls to 37 FPS.
At 1080p, the GPU has more headroom. The Ultra preset at 84 FPS is well above the threshold, and the Low preset at 201 FPS suggests the game is not fully utilizing the hardware. This is a typical situation where the CPU and GPU are both capable, and the frame rate is limited by the game engine or other factors rather than component performance.
At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU. The Ultra preset at 60 FPS is exactly at the threshold, and the High preset at 96 FPS leaves less headroom than at 1080p. The Medium preset at 118 FPS is still comfortable. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo, offering high visual quality without pushing the GPU to its limits.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the best settings preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is High, which averages exactly 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 73 FPS and has a recorded minimum of 62 FPS, making it a more consistent choice, but the database designates High as the best settings for 4K. The Ultra preset at 37 FPS is not playable.
At 2560x1440, the best settings preset is Ultra, which averages exactly 60 FPS. The High preset averages 96 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 118 FPS, but Ultra offers the highest visual quality while still meeting the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets at 1440p are playable, so the choice comes down to preference for visual fidelity versus frame rate headroom.
At 1920x1080, the best settings preset is Ultra, which averages 84 FPS. This is the most demanding preset at this resolution, and it still delivers frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset averages 135 FPS, the Medium preset averages 165 FPS, and the Low preset averages 201 FPS, so all presets are playable with substantial margin.
For players who prioritize consistent frame rates over maximum visual quality, the Medium preset at 4K is the safer option, as its minimum of 62 FPS avoids any dips below 60. At 1440p, the Ultra preset is playable, but the High preset at 96 FPS offers more headroom for demanding scenes. At 1080p, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation, as it provides the best visuals without any risk of dropping below 60 FPS. The data shows this combo is well-suited for Downfall at 1080p and 1440p, and can handle 4K with reduced settings.