Downfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers a robust performance profile for running Downfall, a horror title released in 2016. The CPU, based on the Zen 5 architecture, posts an average benchmark score of 29713, placing it in the 81st percentile of all tested processors. The GPU, built on the Ampere architecture, achieves an average benchmark score of 23172 and sits in the 68th percentile of all tested graphics cards. Together, this pairing produces measured frame rates that range from a demanding 57 FPS at 4K Ultra to a fluid 297.2 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating a strong match for the game’s engine.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 5 9600X’s nearest rivals in benchmark data are all AMD Ryzen 7 parts with nearly identical average scores. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE posts an average score of 29656, which is just 0.2% below the 9600X. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868, trailing by 0.5%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT reaches 29879, a 0.6% deficit. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS rounds out the group with a score of 29955, which is 0.8% lower than the 9600X. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly interchangeable CPU-bound performance in Downfall, with differences well within run-to-run variance.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3080’s nearest rivals present a more unexpected grouping. The NVIDIA P106-100 averages 23249, a 0.3% difference from the RTX 3080’s 23172. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 also scores 23250, another 0.3% gap, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600M hits 23273, just 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X completes the list with 23276, also 0.4% above the RTX 3080. These delta percentages are so small that users upgrading from or comparing to these cards should expect virtually identical frame pacing in this title, though the architectural differences between them would manifest in other workloads.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database’s tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Ryzen 5 9600X and RTX 3080 achieves a combo rank of 1050 out of 3716 total combinations for Downfall. That places the system in the top 28.2% of all tested configurations for this game. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance—evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2923 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2183.5—and the GPU’s substantial rasterization throughput, which includes 8704 shading units and a 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The position in the ranking suggests that while this combo is well above the median configuration, it is not at the absolute top tier. Many higher-ranked combos likely pair newer or more expensive GPUs with comparable CPUs. However, the data shows that for Downfall specifically, the combo’s performance is sufficient to clear the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution tested except 4K Ultra, where it falls to 57 FPS. The rank of 1050 indicates that a significant number of configurations do not achieve this level of consistency, particularly at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates show substantial headroom across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 297.2 FPS, Medium delivers 242.9 FPS, and High reaches 199.1 FPS. Even Ultra, the most demanding preset, maintains an average of 125.2 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combination of the Ryzen 5 9600X’s 6 cores and 12 threads with the RTX 3080’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory is never the limiting factor; the game runs far beyond typical high-refresh-rate monitor capabilities.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages remain high but begin to show the GPU’s workload. Low settings average 215.4 FPS, Medium hits 174.5 FPS, and High produces 144.6 FPS. Ultra at 1440p still manages a strong 92.3 FPS average. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a typical resolution penalty: Ultra drops from 125.2 to 92.3 FPS, a 26.3% reduction, while Low falls from 297.2 to 215.4 FPS, a 27.5% reduction. This consistent scaling suggests the game is well-optimized for the GPU’s memory interface.

At 3840x2160, the limits of the RTX 3080 become apparent. Low settings average 132.7 FPS, Medium drops to 109.5 FPS, and High still clears the 60 FPS threshold with 90 FPS. Ultra, however, falls below the playable threshold to an average of 57 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra at 4K is substantial—33 FPS—indicating that Ultra preset includes effects or shading features that disproportionately tax the GPU at this resolution. The data shows no min or max frame rates recorded for any setting, so the averages represent the sole FPS metric for this analysis.

The Verdict

The benchmark results indicate that this PC can run Downfall with high fidelity across the majority of tested configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with Ultra averaging 125.2 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same holds true: every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra at 92.3 FPS. The system’s ability to maintain Ultra at 1440p above 90 FPS suggests that the Ryzen 5 9600X provides sufficient CPU headroom to feed the RTX 3080 without bottlenecking.

At 3840x2160, the verdict becomes conditional. The playable settings list includes High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best playable preset at 90 FPS average. Ultra at 4K is the only configuration that fails to reach 60 FPS, averaging 57 FPS. For users with 4K displays, the recommendation is to run High settings for a comfortable margin above the playable threshold, or to accept the 3 FPS deficit at Ultra if visual fidelity takes precedence over frame rate consistency. The data shows no scenario where the game is unplayable; even 4K Ultra is only slightly below the 60 FPS mark.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to run Downfall with this hardware?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 with Ultra settings provides an average of 92.3 FPS, making it the highest resolution and preset combination that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 125.2 FPS, but 1440p offers a better balance of visual fidelity and performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Downfall?

A: Yes, but not at Ultra settings. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 shows High settings averaging 90 FPS, Medium at 109.5 FPS, and Low at 132.7 FPS. Ultra at 4K drops to 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals for this game?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X averages 29713 in benchmarks, with nearest rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT scoring 29879 (0.6% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scoring 29955 (0.8% higher). These differences are negligible for gameplay.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: At 3840x2160 Ultra, the GPU appears to be the limiting factor, as the average FPS falls to 57. At 2560x1440 and below, the GPU maintains averages above 90 FPS even at Ultra, suggesting the CPU is not a primary constraint.

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking among tested systems?

A: This pairing ranks 1050 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall, placing it in the upper third of all configurations. The rank reflects its ability to maintain high frame rates across most settings and resolutions.

Q: Does the game’s genre (Horror) affect performance?

A: The measured FPS data does not include genre-specific effects. The averages are consistent across settings, indicating the game’s engine scales predictably with resolution and preset changes, regardless of its horror-themed lighting and effects.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 125.2 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality with a wide margin above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, averaging 92.3 FPS. This setting maintains the 60 FPS floor with over 30 FPS of headroom, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors.

For 3840x2160, the best playable preset is High, which averages 90 FPS. While Ultra produces 57 FPS and falls below the threshold, High delivers a smooth experience with only a modest reduction in visual effects compared to the maximum preset.