Downfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a compelling performance profile for Downfall, a horror title from 2016. The measured data, based on the provided benchmarks, shows this pairing is more than capable of handling the game’s demands across common resolutions. The system’s performance scales predictably with resolution and preset changes, with the GPU clearly being the primary driver of frame rates as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, compares the combo with nearby hardware alternatives, and provides a clear verdict on its playability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data for this combo in Downfall is comprehensive, covering three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional performance, with average frame rates well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The 1920x1080 resolution shows an average of 313.8 FPS on Low settings, 254.6 FPS on Medium, 211.9 FPS on High, and 131 FPS on Ultra. The jump from Ultra to Low represents a 2.4x increase in frame rate, indicating that the preset has a substantial impact on performance. Even at the most demanding 1080p preset, the average FPS of 131 is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, leaving a significant amount of headroom for any potential frame drops.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong. The average FPS at Low settings is 222, Medium is 183.9, High is 147.3, and Ultra is 92.2. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an expected performance cost, with the Ultra preset seeing a reduction from 131 FPS to 92.2 FPS, a drop of approximately 30%. This is a typical cost for a higher pixel count, but the system still maintains an average well above 60 FPS at every preset. The data indicates that 1440p Ultra is a viable option, as the 92.2 FPS average provides a comfortable margin.

At 3840x2160, the performance characteristics shift. The system still performs admirably, but the Ultra preset begins to approach the 60 FPS threshold. The average FPS at Low settings is 140, Medium is 114.7, High is 94, and Ultra is 57.9. The Ultra preset is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold, with an average of 57.9 FPS. This suggests that while 4K is playable on High settings, attempting to run the game at 4K Ultra would result in a sub-optimal experience. The performance delta between Medium and Ultra at 4K is significant, a 56.8 FPS difference, which highlights the heavy load of the Ultra preset at this resolution. The data shows a clear progression: 4K Ultra is the only setting in the entire measured dataset that fails to clear the 60 FPS mark.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The data for the CPU and GPU provides context on what other hardware might offer a similar experience. For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F has an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rivals are very close in performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has an average score of 24964, a mere 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935, a 0.3% difference, and the Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911, a 0.4% difference. This indicates that the 8400F is essentially performance-equivalent to these three processors in general benchmarks, meaning any of them would likely provide a similar level of CPU-bound performance in Downfall.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a score of 37628 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 with a score of 37507 (0.4% difference). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135, which is 1.3% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 scores 37157, which is 1.3% lower. The close scores of the Tesla P4 and RX Vega 56 suggest that these GPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Downfall as the RTX 4070, assuming no other bottlenecks. The RTX 4080 Mobile being slightly faster implies it could offer a marginal FPS improvement in GPU-bound scenarios.

When considering a full system alternative, one could pair a CPU like the Ryzen 5 7500F with a GPU like the RX Vega 56. Based on the benchmark data, this combination would be expected to produce very similar results to the 8400F and RTX 4070 pairing, given the near-identical average scores of the individual components. The data suggests that the specific choice among these tightly clustered alternatives would yield a nearly indistinguishable gameplay experience in Downfall.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, but not at the highest settings. The measured data shows an average of 94 FPS at 4K High settings, which is playable. However, at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate drops to 57.9 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p to ensure a high frame rate?

A: The data shows that the Ultra preset at 2560x1440 yields an average of 92.2 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS at this resolution, making it the best option for maximizing visual quality while maintaining playability.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: The performance cost varies by preset. For example, the average FPS at Ultra settings drops from 131 at 1080p to 92.2 at 1440p, a reduction of approximately 30%. The absolute drop is less severe at lower presets, with Low settings going from 313.8 FPS to 222 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at higher resolutions?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The frame rate at 4K Ultra is 57.9 FPS, which is lower than the 4K High result of 94 FPS, showing a strong dependence on the graphics card's workload. The CPU, with its high benchmark scores, does not appear to be a limiting factor in these tests.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Medium and High presets at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the Medium preset averages 114.7 FPS, while the High preset averages 94 FPS. This represents a 20.7 FPS difference, indicating that the High preset is more demanding but still provides a significantly higher frame rate than the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Does this combo rank highly among other tested systems for this game?

A: The combo is ranked 853 out of 3716 tested combinations. This places it in a strong position, outperforming the majority of other systems that have been benchmarked for Downfall.

The Verdict

The benchmark results are unequivocal. This PC can run Downfall at all tested resolutions, with the single exception of 4K Ultra settings. The verdict by resolution confirms this: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best at an average of 94 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution is the only one that fails to meet the 60 FPS playability standard.

At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, including Ultra, which achieves an average of 92.2 FPS. This makes 1440p the sweet spot for this hardware, offering a perfect balance between visual fidelity and high frame rates. Similarly, at 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra achieving an average of 131 FPS. The data shows that the system excels at 1080p and 1440p, providing a high-refresh-rate experience even on the most demanding presets. For 4K gaming, users should select the High preset or lower to ensure a smooth and consistent experience, as the Ultra preset's 57.9 FPS average is a clear miss of the target.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU in Downfall. At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset reaching 313.8 FPS. This suggests that at lower resolutions and less demanding settings, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to achieve these high frame rates. The performance scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p is significant, but even the Ultra preset's 131 FPS is likely not fully stressing the CPU's capabilities.

The GPU's role becomes more prominent as resolution increases. The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial across all presets, a clear sign that the graphics card is the limiting factor. For instance, the Medium preset goes from 254.6 FPS at 1080p to 114.7 FPS at 4K. The most telling data point is the 4K Ultra result of 57.9 FPS, which is the only sub-60 FPS score in the entire dataset. This indicates that the GPU is overwhelmed by the combined demand of 4K resolution and the Ultra preset's visual effects. The CPU, with its high single and multi-threaded scores, does not appear to be the bottleneck in these scenarios. The data implies that for the best experience at 4K, the GPU workload must be reduced by lowering the preset, while at 1080p and 1440p, the system is well-balanced with the GPU handling the increased pixel load without becoming a severe bottleneck until the most extreme settings are used.

Best Settings per Resolution

Based on the measured data, the best settings are defined as the most demanding preset that still maintains an average frame rate at or above the 60 FPS playable threshold. For 3840x2160, the best settings are High, which yields an average of 94 FPS. The Ultra preset is not viable, as its 57.9 FPS average falls short of the target.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, achieving an average of 92.2 FPS. This configuration provides the highest visual quality while still offering a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is also the best, with an average of 131 FPS. This provides an excellent high-refresh-rate experience with maximum graphical fidelity. In summary, the optimal settings for this combo are High at 4K, Ultra at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p, each delivering a fluid and playable experience according to the data.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination holds a rank of 853 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places it within the top 23% of all tested systems. This ranking is a strong indicator of the system's overall capability, showing that it outperforms a significant majority of other hardware pairings. The high percentile rankings of its individual components—the CPU at 77% and the GPU at 81%—corroborate this strong performance. The close proximity of the GPU's nearest rival scores, such as the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, further contextualizes this rank, showing that a system with a slightly less powerful GPU would likely fall a bit lower in the rankings, while one with a more powerful GPU, like the RTX 4080 Mobile, would climb higher. Overall, the data confirms that this is a high-performing combination that should handle Downfall with ease at most settings.