Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 64 | 99 | 124 | 148 |
| 1440p QHD | 103 | 161 | 200 | 240 |
| 1080p Full HD | 142 | 226 | 275 | 339 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Downfall, a 2016 horror title. Measured data shows this pairing clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at every tested resolution and preset, with the most demanding configuration—4K Ultra—averaging 63.8 FPS. The data indicates a system with substantial headroom, making it a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have close rivals based on aggregate benchmark scores, which helps contextualize their performance in Downfall. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,324. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, scores 26,274, a delta of just 0.2%—effectively identical performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is marginally faster at 26,402 (0.3% ahead), while the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26,212, 0.4% behind) and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26,187, 0.5% behind) are also within a rounding error. For Downfall, any of these CPUs would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates, as the game's demands are easily met by all of them.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5070 ranks at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40,377. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, scores 40,318—a 0.1% difference, meaning the two are essentially tied in synthetic tests. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40,063) trails by 0.8%, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40,870) leads by 1.2%. The NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568) is 2% behind. These deltas are small enough that in a real-world game like Downfall, the RTX 5070's advantage over these rivals would likely manifest as a few frames per second at most, not a qualitative difference in playability. The data suggests that a system with any of these GPUs paired with a similarly performing CPU would offer a comparable experience, though the RTX 5070's specific architecture and driver optimizations could still yield minor advantages in certain scenes.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K Ultra settings?*
A: Yes. Measured data shows an average of 63.8 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. This is the most demanding preset tested, and it remains playable, though with less headroom than lower settings.
Q: What is the highest FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The maximum average frame rate is 338.9 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This indicates the system is far from bottlenecked at 1080p, even on the least demanding preset.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 compare to its nearest GPU rival in raw performance?
A: The RTX 5070's average benchmark score is 40,377, while its closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, scores 40,318—a 0.1% difference. This places them statistically tied, meaning in Downfall, the RTX 5070 would not have a meaningful performance edge over that specific rival.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7600 a bottleneck for the RTX 5070 in this game?
A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 338.9 FPS, and at 4K Ultra it still hits 63.8 FPS. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking and its rivals' similar scores suggest it has ample headroom for this title, which is not particularly CPU-intensive.
Q: What is the playable threshold, and does this combo exceed it at all settings?
A: The playable threshold is 60 FPS. The combination exceeds this at every resolution and preset tested, from 4K Ultra (63.8 FPS) to 1080p Low (338.9 FPS). The lowest recorded average is 63.8 FPS, so there is no configuration where it drops below the threshold.
*Q: How does the combo rank among all tested systems for Downfall?*
A: This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 703rd out of 3,716 tested combos. This places it in the top 19% of all systems tested, which is consistent with its ability to maintain high frame rates across all settings.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 63.8 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting, and it just clears the playable threshold, leaving minimal room for frame rate dips. For a more comfortable margin, High settings at 4K yield 98.7 FPS, which is a substantial improvement in smoothness.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings average 103.3 FPS, far exceeding the 60 FPS threshold. This makes 1440p Ultra the recommended choice for a high-quality experience with plenty of headroom. The data shows that even the most demanding preset at this resolution is not a stress test for this hardware.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings average 141.5 FPS. This is well above the threshold and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The system is clearly GPU-bound at this resolution, as evidenced by the jump to 338.9 FPS on Low settings, but Ultra remains the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.
The Verdict
The data is unambiguous: this PC can run Downfall at every resolution and preset combination tested, all of which clear the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the best playable setting is Ultra, with an average of 63.8 FPS—playable but with limited headroom. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 103.3 FPS, offering a comfortable margin. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 141.5 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming. The verdict by resolution confirms all settings are playable, with no configuration falling below 60 FPS. This system is not just capable of running the game; it does so with significant performance reserves, particularly at 1080p and 1440p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 338.9 FPS, Medium drops to 275.4 FPS, High yields 225.9 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 141.5 FPS. The scaling between Low and Ultra is steep, with Ultra being roughly 58% slower than Low, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiter at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 239.9 FPS, Medium 199.5 FPS, High 161 FPS, and Ultra 103.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is about 57%, similar to 1080p, suggesting consistent scaling behavior. The system remains far above the 60 FPS threshold even at Ultra.
At 3840x2160, the performance is still strong but shows the expected drop from higher resolutions. Low settings average 147.9 FPS, Medium 123.8 FPS, High 98.7 FPS, and Ultra 63.8 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is roughly 57% again, but the absolute numbers are much lower, with Ultra barely clearing the playable threshold. The data shows that 4K Ultra is the only configuration where the system approaches its limits, though it still does not fall below 60 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
This combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 703rd out of 3,716 tested combos in Downfall. This places it in the top 19% of all systems, which is a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank reflects the system's ability to maintain high frame rates across all settings, particularly at 1080p and 1440p where it excels. The data suggests that most of the 703 combos ranked above it likely feature more powerful GPUs or CPUs, but the practical difference in Downfall is minimal given that this system already exceeds 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. The rank is a useful metric for comparison, but the measured FPS data provides a clearer picture of real-world performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the GPU is the dominant factor, as evidenced by the dramatic scaling from Low (338.9 FPS) to Ultra (141.5 FPS). The CPU, with its 78th percentile ranking, has enough headroom to feed the GPU at these high frame rates, but the GPU's workload increases significantly with higher presets. The system is not CPU-bound at 1080p, as the frame rates are far above what the CPU would limit.
At 2560x1440, the GPU's role becomes even more pronounced. The frame rates drop from 239.9 FPS on Low to 103.3 FPS on Ultra, a 57% reduction that mirrors the 1080p scaling. This indicates that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck, with the CPU providing sufficient support. The CPU's performance is adequate, but the GPU's rendering load is what determines the final frame rate.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is overwhelmingly the limiting factor. The frame rates fall to 147.9 FPS on Low and 63.8 FPS on Ultra, showing that the GPU's pixel throughput is the key constraint. The CPU's role diminishes further, as the system is clearly GPU-bound at this resolution. The scaling between presets remains consistent, but the absolute numbers are lower, confirming that the RTX 5070's compute and memory bandwidth are the deciding factors. The CPU, while not a bottleneck, contributes less to overall performance as resolution increases. The data implies that for Downfall, upgrading the GPU would yield larger gains than upgrading the CPU, especially at 4K.