Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 87 | 112 | 131 |
| 1440p QHD | 93 | 145 | 177 | 217 |
| 1080p Full HD | 127 | 201 | 244 | 301 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a decisive performance outcome in Downfall: it clears the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested resolution, provided you select the appropriate graphics preset. At 1080p and 1440p, this combo is overwhelmingly capable, even at Ultra settings, while 4K requires a slight compromise from the maximum preset to maintain smooth gameplay.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rate data for this combination shows a clear and consistent scaling pattern across the three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptionally high frame rates. The Low preset averages 301.2 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving up the quality ladder, Medium averages 244.1 FPS, High averages 201.1 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains a robust 126.6 FPS average. These numbers indicate that at Full HD, the bottleneck is far from being reached, and the hardware is operating well within its comfort zone.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain impressive but begin to show the increased pixel workload. The Low preset averages 216.6 FPS, followed by Medium at 176.9 FPS and High at 145.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p delivers an average of 92.7 FPS, which is a substantial 26.7% reduction from the 1080p Ultra figure of 126.6 FPS. Even at this higher resolution, the average frame rate sits comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, leaving significant headroom for demanding scenes.
The 3840x2160 results are where the hardware starts to feel the pressure. The Low preset at 4K averages 130.7 FPS, and Medium averages 111.9 FPS, both of which are excellent. High at 4K averages 87.2 FPS, which remains very playable. However, the Ultra preset at 4K drops to an average of 55.2 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset where the combo fails to maintain a playable average frame rate. The gap between 1440p Ultra (92.7 FPS) and 4K Ultra (55.2 FPS) is a steep 37.5 FPS decline, highlighting the significant cost of rendering four times the pixels.
It is important to note that the FACT PACK includes only average FPS values; minimum and maximum frame rates are not provided. Therefore, the analysis is based solely on average performance, which typically correlates with overall smoothness but does not capture individual frame hitches or stutters. The data indicates a linear progression where each reduction in resolution or quality preset yields a predictable increase in average frame rate.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination holds the rank of 1033 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the 72nd percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 72% of the configurations evaluated for this game. This is a strong showing, particularly for a system that was not built with top-tier flagship components.
The rank is determined by the aggregate performance across all tested resolutions and presets. The system's strength lies in its consistency; it does not merely excel at one resolution but maintains a high level of performance across the board. The only weak point, the 4K Ultra preset, prevents the combo from ranking higher. If the 4K Ultra result had cleared 60 FPS, the overall rank would likely be significantly better. As it stands, the 1033rd position out of 3716 combos indicates a system that is firmly in the upper tier of gaming performance, capable of handling most scenarios without issue.
The data shows that this combination is more powerful than the average tested rig. The high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p suggest that the system is not being heavily taxed at these resolutions, and the 4K results confirm that it is a viable 4K gaming platform for all but the most demanding settings. The rank reflects a balanced pairing where neither the CPU nor the GPU is a clear limiting factor at standard gaming resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearestRivals data for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware might deliver comparable performance. For the AMD Ryzen 5 7600, the closest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, Intel Core i9-11900KF, and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U. In terms of average benchmark score, the Ryzen 5 7600 scores 26324. The Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 26274, a negligible 0.2% difference. The Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 26402, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, a 0.4% difference, and the Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, a 0.5% difference. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning any of these CPUs would deliver virtually identical gaming performance in Downfall, assuming the GPU remains the same. A user upgrading from any of these processors to the Ryzen 5 7600 would see no meaningful change in frame rates.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 has an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and AMD Radeon R9 M290X. The P106-100 scores 23249, which is 0.3% higher. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250, also 0.3% higher. The RX 6600M scores 23273, 0.4% higher, and the R9 M290X scores 23276, 0.4% higher. These differences are similarly negligible. However, the presence of these rivals in the database is surprising given the RTX 3080's position in the market. The data suggests that, based on the aggregate benchmark scores used here, these older or lower-tier cards produce comparable results. For the purposes of Downfall, a system with an RTX 3080 would perform nearly identically to one with any of these listed GPUs, assuming the CPU is held constant. The practical takeaway is that the performance envelope of this combo is well-defined, and minor hardware substitutions within the same performance class will not alter the verdict.
The Verdict
The verdict for this PC running Downfall is clear: it is fully capable of running the game at playable frame rates across nearly all configurations. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable, with the best setting being Ultra at an average of 126.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra being the best setting at an average of 92.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, three of the four presets are playable: High (87.2 FPS), Medium (111.9 FPS), and Low (130.7 FPS). The Ultra preset at 4K, averaging 55.2 FPS, is the sole unplayable configuration.
The data shows that this system will clear 60 FPS at 1080p and 1440p with maximum settings, and at 4K with High settings or lower. For users who prioritize visual fidelity, the 4K High preset offers a strong balance, delivering an average of 87.2 FPS. The system's performance is such that it provides a smooth experience for the vast majority of gaming scenarios in Downfall. The only recommendation is to avoid the 4K Ultra preset, which is a demanding configuration that pushes the hardware past its limit. With that single caveat, this PC is a resounding success for this title.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling between resolutions and presets reveals the relative workload distribution between the CPU and GPU. The data shows a dramatic increase in frame rates as resolution drops, which is a hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. For instance, the difference between 4K Ultra (55.2 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (126.6 FPS) is 71.4 FPS, or a 129% improvement. This substantial scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K. The RTX 3080 is being pushed hard to fill the 8.3 million pixels of a 4K display, and its performance drops accordingly.
Conversely, at 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high. The jump from 1440p Low (216.6 FPS) to 1080p Low (301.2 FPS) is 84.6 FPS, which is a 39% increase. This suggests that the system is becoming less GPU-bound at lower resolutions, and the CPU's performance begins to play a larger role. The Ryzen 5 7600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is sufficiently powerful to feed the RTX 3080 at these high frame rates. However, the data does not isolate CPU performance, so it is not possible to determine the exact point where the CPU becomes the bottleneck.
The preset scaling further clarifies the GPU's role. At any given resolution, the difference between Low and Ultra presets is significant. At 1440p, for example, the gap is 123.9 FPS (216.6 to 92.7). This is entirely a GPU workload increase, as higher presets typically increase shader complexity, texture detail, and post-processing effects. The CPU workload remains relatively constant across presets. Therefore, the consistent and large frame rate drops with higher presets confirm that the GPU is the dominant factor in determining performance. The CPU's role is to ensure that it can deliver draw calls and game logic quickly enough to avoid stalling the GPU. Given the high frame rates at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 7600 is performing its role effectively, but the GPU is clearly the component that dictates the overall experience.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K with the Ultra preset?*
A: No. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the system averages 55.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable 4K setting is High, which averages 87.2 FPS.
Q: What is the highest quality setting that maintains 60 FPS at 2560x1440?
A: All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 2560x1440. The Ultra preset averages 92.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the best choice for maximum quality.
Q: How does the performance at 1920x1080 compare to 3840x2160 on the High preset?
A: At 1920x1080 High, the system averages 201.1 FPS. At 3840x2160 High, it averages 87.2 FPS. This represents a 113.9 FPS drop, or a 57% decrease in performance when moving from Full HD to 4K.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 a significant factor in this game's performance?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary performance driver. The frame rate scales heavily with resolution and preset, which are GPU-centric workloads. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, is only 0.2% different in benchmark score, suggesting CPU choice within this performance class has minimal impact.
Q: What are the closest performance alternatives to the RTX 3080 for this game?
A: Based on the aggregate benchmark scores, the NVIDIA P106-100 (0.3% higher), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (0.3% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (0.4% higher), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (0.4% higher) are the nearest rivals. These would produce nearly identical frame rates in Downfall.
Q: What is the best overall setting to use for this game?
A: For the highest visual quality while maintaining a playable frame rate, the 2560x1440 Ultra preset (92.7 FPS) is the best choice. At 4K, the High preset (87.2 FPS) offers the best balance. At 1080p, the Ultra preset (126.6 FPS) is optimal.