Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 18 | 30 | 35 | 42 |
| 1440p QHD | 29 | 46 | 54 | 69 |
| 1080p Full HD | 38 | 62 | 76 | 90 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
Downfall, a horror title released in early 2016, presents an interesting case for the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and the AMD Radeon RX 570. The CPU is a modern Zen 4 part sitting in the 78th percentile of all processors in the database, while the GPU is an end-of-life Polaris card in the 74th percentile among graphics cards. That mismatch in age does not matter much for a game from this era, and the measured results confirm the pairing is more than sufficient at mainstream resolutions. Below is the full breakdown of the recorded frame rates, the balance between processor and graphics load, and where this combination ranks overall.
Best Settings per Resolution
The database applies a 60 FPS average threshold for playability, and the recorded data shows a clear picture at each resolution.
At 1920x1080, the best setting is High, delivering an average of 61.9 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that stays at or above the threshold. Medium runs at 75.9 FPS and Low reaches 89.9 FPS, so there is comfortable headroom below High. Ultra, at 38 FPS, falls well short of the target and should be avoided if smooth motion is the priority.
At 2560x1440, no preset above Low clears the bar. Low averages 69 FPS, Medium drops to 54.2 FPS, High to 45.9 FPS, and Ultra to 29.1 FPS. The fall from Low to Medium is roughly 21 percent, and from Medium to High another 15 percent or so, which means each step up in quality costs meaningful performance at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, nothing is playable. Low manages only 42 FPS, Medium 35.4 FPS, High 29.6 FPS, and Ultra a slide-show 17.6 FPS. The 4 GB GDDR5 frame buffer on the RX 570, paired with a 256-bit bus and 224 GB/s of bandwidth, is simply being pushed past its comfort zone at four times the pixel count of 1080p.
The practical recommendation: play at 1080p on High. If a higher resolution display is the target, 1440p on Low works but with little margin.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling data points firmly to a GPU-limited configuration at every resolution, which is exactly what you want to see when the processor is as strong as the Ryzen 5 7600.
Look at the drop-off going from 1080p to 1440p on the same preset. Low falls from 89.9 to 69 FPS, Medium from 75.9 to 54.2, High from 61.9 to 45.9, and Ultra from 38 to 29.1. Those are steep declines driven almost entirely by the graphics card, since the CPU load does not change with resolution. If the processor were the constraint, frame rates would stay roughly flat as pixels increased. They do not.
The preset scaling tells the same story. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra cuts the average from 89.9 to 38 FPS, a reduction of well over half. Visual quality settings load the GPU far more than the CPU in a title like this, and the recorded numbers confirm it.
The Ryzen 5 7600 has the headroom to spare regardless. It is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on a 5 nm TSMC process, boosting to 5.10 GHz on Socket AM5, with a 65 W TDP and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Its benchmark portfolio includes a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735, a single-core score of 1852, a Geekbench multi-core result of 13413, and a PassMark multithread rating of 27058. Its single-thread PassMark score of 3910 and 3DMark single-thread result of 999 describe a processor that will not blink at a 2016 horror game's logic, physics, and draw-call demands.
The RX 570, by contrast, is the component doing all the work. It is a Polaris 20 chip on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm node with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 32 render output units, and 5.095 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. It supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, so it fully covers the API requirements of a game from this period. Its recorded synthetic results, including 880 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 42752, sit in the 74th percentile of all GPUs in the database. In this pairing, the GPU sets the ceiling and the CPU is never the bottleneck.
FAQ
Q: Can the Ryzen 5 7600 and RX 570 run Downfall at 1080p?
A: Yes, comfortably. High settings average 61.9 FPS, Medium 75.9 FPS, and Low 89.9 FPS. Only Ultra (38 FPS) misses the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Is 4K playable on this setup?
A: No. Even Low settings average just 42 FPS at 3840x2160, with Medium at 35.4, High at 29.6, and Ultra at 17.6. No preset reaches the 60 FPS bar.
Q: What is the best overall settings combination?
A: 1920x1080 at High settings, averaging 61.9 FPS. This is the highest visual quality that stays at or above the 60 FPS playability threshold at any resolution.
Q: Can this PC run Downfall on Ultra?
A: Not at a smooth frame rate. Ultra averages 38 FPS at 1080p, 29.1 FPS at 1440p, and 17.6 FPS at 4K, all below the threshold.
Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the limiting factor?
A: The GPU. Frame rates drop sharply as resolution and preset quality rise, which is characteristic of graphics-limited scaling. The Ryzen 5 7600's benchmark scores place it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, leaving large reserves for a 2016 title.
Q: How much performance is lost stepping from 1080p to 1440p?
A: On Low, average FPS falls from 89.9 to 69. On High, it falls from 61.9 to 45.9. Both declines are driven by the RX 570, not the processor.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the processor side, the database identifies several CPUs with nearly identical aggregate performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX sits within 0.2 percent of the 7600's average benchmark score, the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is within 0.3 percent, the Intel Core i9-11900KF within 0.4 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U within 0.5 percent. Any of these chips would deliver effectively the same experience in Downfall, since the game is GPU-bound here anyway. The Ryzen 5 7600 launched at an MSRP of $229 and remains an active product, with an unlocked multiplier for anyone wanting more headroom.
On the graphics side, the closest cards by aggregate score are the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (within 0.4 percent), the AMD Radeon R9 M295X (within 0.7 percent), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (within 0.8 percent), and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 (within 1.2 percent). The RX 470 comparison is particularly relevant: it is a close Polaris sibling to the RX 570 and would behave almost identically in this game. The others span a mix of mobile and professional parts whose overall database scores converge with the RX 570 despite very different origins, and they should produce broadly comparable frame rates in a title of this age. The RX 570 launched at 169 USD and is now end-of-life, succeeded architecturally by Vega.
Note that the RX 570 is a dual-slot card, 241 mm long, drawing 150 W through a single 6-pin connector, with a suggested 450 W power supply. It connects over PCIe 3.0 x16, which runs fine in the Ryzen 5 7600's PCIe Gen 5 slots.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3716 tested hardware combinations for Downfall, the Ryzen 5 7600 plus RX 570 pairing ranks 3507th. That places it near the bottom of the leaderboard in absolute terms, but the context matters: the rankings cover all tested configurations, including far more powerful modern GPUs that push this undemanding 2016 title to extremely high frame rates. Ranking low on the list does not mean the game runs poorly, it means faster hardware exists that runs it faster.
The more useful lens is the verdict data itself. This combination clears the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p on three presets (Low, Medium, and High) and at 1440p on one preset (Low). Many combinations rank above it by pushing Ultra settings or 4K beyond what the RX 570 can deliver here, but for practical play at 1080p High, the ranking gap is academic.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Downfall, with clear conditions on resolution.
At 1920x1080, the game is genuinely playable: High settings average 61.9 FPS, Medium 75.9 FPS, and Low 89.9 FPS. High is the recommended preset, offering the best visuals while holding the 60 FPS line. At 2560x1440, only Low settings clear the threshold at 69 FPS, so it is playable but with reduced visual fidelity and limited headroom. At 3840x2160, the verdict is a firm no: the best result is 42 FPS on Low, well short of the target, and Ultra bottoms out at 17.6 FPS.
The split of responsibility is unambiguous. The Ryzen 5 7600, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with strong single- and multi-thread benchmark results, is never the limiting factor. The RX 570, a Polaris card with 4 GB of GDDR5 and 5.095 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, determines every frame rate in the recorded data. For a 1080p player content with High settings, this combination handles Downfall exactly as intended, and the steep GPU-driven scaling means a future graphics upgrade would translate directly into higher presets or resolutions without touching the processor.