Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Downfall
Horror 2016

Downfall

90%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
185 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
77 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
132 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
55 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
82 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
8.1ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,515
Your CPU 44,573
Graphics Card
Required 27,400
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 55 67 82
1440p QHD 55 88 108 132
1080p Full HD 77 124 151 185

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 124
1920x1080 Low 185
1920x1080 Medium 151
1920x1080 Ultra 77
2560x1440 High 88
2560x1440 Low 132
2560x1440 Medium 108
2560x1440 Ultra 55
3840x2160 High 55
3840x2160 Low 82
3840x2160 Medium 67
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System

This is a hardware analyst report for the benchmark database website, focusing on the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B580 combination in the game Downfall.

The benchmark data for this combination shows a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings, with the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B580 demonstrating strong 1080p and 1440p capabilities while struggling to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings. The measured results indicate a system that is well-balanced for mainstream gaming, with the 6-core/12-thread AMD processor and the Intel Arc B580’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory providing a solid foundation for this horror title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Downfall reveals a distinct pattern of performance scaling as resolution and graphical settings are adjusted.

At 1920x1080, the combination performs exceptionally well across the board. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 185. Moving up to Medium settings, the average drops to 151, with a minimum of 128 and a maximum of 174 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 124 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 77 FPS, which is still well above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance remains robust. The Low preset achieves an average of 132 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 108 FPS, with a minimum of 92 and a maximum of 124 FPS. High settings average 88 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, sees a significant drop to an average of 55 FPS, falling just below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The 3840x2160 resolution presents the greatest challenge. Low settings average 82 FPS. Medium settings average 67 FPS, with a minimum of 57 and a maximum of 77 FPS. High settings average 55 FPS. The Ultra preset averages only 34 FPS, indicating a substantial performance cost at this resolution.

The data shows a consistent trend: frame rates scale predictably with preset changes, and the gap between 1440p and 4K is particularly pronounced, especially in the Ultra preset where the average FPS drops from 55 at 1440p to 34 at 4K.

Best Settings per Resolution

The best settings are defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, achieving an average of 77 FPS. This demonstrates that the hardware has sufficient headroom to run the game at its highest visual quality without compromising smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the optimal selection, delivering an average of 88 FPS. While the Ultra preset is available, its average of 55 FPS falls below the playable threshold, so High is the recommended setting for a smooth experience at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the best option, with an average of 67 FPS. This is the only preset above Low that maintains 60 FPS at 4K. The High preset averages 55 FPS, which is below the target, and Ultra averages 34 FPS.

These results indicate that the system can effectively handle high refresh rates at 1080p, maintain a solid 60+ FPS experience at 1440p with High settings, and requires a compromise down to Medium settings to achieve fluent gameplay at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

Analyzing the scaling between resolutions and presets provides insight into which component is the limiting factor in this game.

The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is moderate, with the High preset falling from 124 FPS to 88 FPS. This is a 29% reduction. The further drop from 1440p to 4K is even more severe, with High settings falling from 88 FPS to 55 FPS, a 37.5% reduction. This increasing performance penalty as resolution rises indicates that the Intel Arc B580 GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the rendering load on the graphics card grows exponentially.

The CPU's role is more evident at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high, particularly at Low settings (185 FPS). The fact that the CPU can feed the GPU enough data to reach these frame rates suggests the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is not a limiting factor at this resolution. The single-thread score of 3494 in the Passmark data supports this, showing strong per-core performance.

However, the data also shows that the GPU's limits are hit at higher presets. The Ultra preset at 1440p (55 FPS) and 4K (34 FPS) shows that the Arc B580’s compute capabilities are saturated, regardless of the CPU's ability to keep up. The scaling from Medium to High to Ultra at 4K shows a clear linear progression of lower frame rates, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance. The CPU, with its 96 MB of shared L3 cache and a multithread score of 25047, is unlikely to be the source of these frame rate dips.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, based on average benchmark scores, are very closely matched. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H has an average score of 44466, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342, just 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, which is 0.6% lower. Finally, the Intel Core i5-14600 scores 44889, which is 0.7% higher. These deltas are minimal, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, these processors would perform nearly identically to the Ryzen 5 7500X3D.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the Intel Arc B580 are also extremely close in overall score. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP has an average score of 23061, which is 0.2% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, a 0.6% deficit. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, which is 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, which is 1% higher. Given these narrow margins, any of these GPUs would likely produce very similar frame rates in Downfall, assuming they are not limited by other factors like VRAM. The Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is a notable asset here, as some of its rivals may have less memory, which could impact performance at 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B580 holds a rank of 2802 out of 3716 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the 75th percentile of all tested systems. While this is not a top-tier ranking, it indicates that the system performs better than the majority of tested configurations in this game.

The ranking is a reflection of the balanced nature of the hardware. The CPU’s percentile rank against all CPUs is 89, and the GPU’s percentile against all GPUs is 68. The combo rank being lower than the CPU's individual percentile suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The system is well-matched, but the GPU prevents the combination from achieving a higher overall rank in this particular title.

The Verdict

Based on the verdict-by-resolution data, this PC can run Downfall effectively at all three tested resolutions, provided the settings are appropriately adjusted.

At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable, with the Ultra preset providing an average of 77 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS playable threshold with ease and offers the best visual experience.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is playable, with an average of 88 FPS. The Ultra preset is not recommended, as its average of 55 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system can run the game at Medium settings with an average of 67 FPS. This is a playable configuration. The Low preset also works, with an average of 82 FPS, but Medium is the best settings choice. The High and Ultra presets are not playable at this resolution, as they produce averages of 55 and 34 FPS, respectively.

In summary, the verdict is positive. The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B580 provides a good gaming experience for Downfall at 1080p and 1440p, and a serviceable one at 4K when settings are moderated.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 60 FPS experience at 1920x1080?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice, achieving an average of 77 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

*Q: Can this system run Downfall at 2560x1440 with maximum settings?*

A: No. The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 55 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset, with an average of 88 FPS, is the recommended setting for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

Q: What is the most demanding playable preset at 3840x2160?

A: The Medium preset is the most demanding setting that maintains 60 FPS, with an average of 67 FPS. The High and Ultra presets average 55 and 34 FPS, respectively, which are not playable.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 in terms of overall performance?

A: Based on the Passmark G3D average benchmark score, the Intel Arc B580 scores 15748, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 has a similar average score of 22895. The delta between their average scores is 0.6%, indicating nearly identical overall performance.

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?

A: The average FPS is 151, with a minimum of 128 and a maximum of 174 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor at 3840x2160?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K. The frame rate drops significantly from 88 FPS at 1440p High to 55 FPS at 4K High, and further to 34 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is consistent with GPU-bound rendering load.