Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 63 | 78 | 94 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 103 | 124 | 152 |
| 1080p Full HD | 87 | 143 | 171 | 211 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, which delivers an average of 63 FPS. Ultra drops to 41.2 FPS, so it falls below the playable threshold.
Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 1440p with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 60.6 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, though with only a narrow margin of 0.6 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964. It sits 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935), 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911), and 0.4% above the Intel Core 5 210H (24872). The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is 0.2% ahead at 25005.
Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks in the 65th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 20282.
Q: Which GPU rivals are closest in performance to the RTX 2070 SUPER?
A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, 1% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 1.2% ahead), the Intel Arc B570 (20556, 1.3% ahead), and the Intel Arc A750 (20582, 1.5% ahead). All of these are within 1.5% of the RTX 2070 SUPER's average score.
Q: What is the CPU's percentile standing among all CPUs?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data for Downfall shows a consistent pattern across resolutions: the GPU is the dominant component at higher resolutions, while the CPU's headroom becomes more apparent at lower resolutions. This is a horror title from 2016, and the measured FPS values reveal how the balance shifts.
At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high across all presets. Low averages 211.3 FPS, Medium averages 170.7 FPS, High averages 142.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 87.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 123.9 FPS, which indicates that the GPU is still the main scaling factor, but the CPU is clearly capable of feeding very high frame rates. At this resolution, the Ryzen 5 7500F's strong single-thread performance (3218 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 3841 in Passmark single-thread) ensures that the GPU is not starved of work.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but the scaling tightens. Low averages 152.4 FPS, Medium averages 124.4 FPS, High averages 103.2 FPS, and Ultra averages 60.6 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 91.8 FPS, slightly less than at 1080p. The GPU begins to assert more influence as pixel count increases, but the CPU still has ample headroom.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low averages 93.6 FPS, Medium averages 78 FPS, High averages 63 FPS, and Ultra averages 41.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The scaling from Low to Ultra is 52.4 FPS, the smallest absolute difference of any resolution, which confirms that the GPU's rendering limits are being reached rather than any CPU constraint.
The pattern is straightforward: at 1080p and 1440p, this combo has enough CPU capability to push very high frame rates, and the GPU determines the ceiling. At 4K, the RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor, especially as settings increase. The CPU's role diminishes at 4K, as evidenced by the relatively smaller spread between presets.
Best Settings per Resolution
For 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 87.4 FPS. This leaves substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, so even the heaviest settings are comfortably playable.
For 2560x1440, the best settings are also Ultra, averaging 60.6 FPS. This is a marginal pass, with only 0.6 FPS of headroom, so players who prefer a buffer might consider High at 103.2 FPS for more stability.
For 3840x2160, the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS is High, averaging 63 FPS. Low (93.6 FPS) and Medium (78 FPS) are also playable, but High offers the best visual quality while still clearing the threshold. Ultra at 41.2 FPS is not playable at this resolution.
The Verdict
This PC can run Downfall, but the experience varies significantly by resolution. The verdict data is clear: at 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) clear 60 FPS, with Ultra averaging 87.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear 60 FPS, with Ultra barely passing at 60.6 FPS. At 3840x2160, three presets are playable: Low (93.6 FPS), Medium (78 FPS), and High (63 FPS). Ultra at 4K is the sole failure, averaging 41.2 FPS.
The practical takeaway is that this combination is a strong performer for Downfall at 1080p and 1440p, capable of running the game at maximum settings with playable frame rates. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and players must settle for High settings or lower to maintain 60 FPS. The narrow 60.6 FPS result at 1440p Ultra also suggests that demanding scenes could dip below 60 FPS, even if the average is technically playable.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Ryzen 5 7500F's nearest CPU rivals in the database are all within 0.4% of its average benchmark score of 24964. The Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, 0.1% faster), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, 0.2% slower), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, 0.2% faster), and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, 0.4% faster) would all produce nearly identical CPU-bound behavior in Downfall. In practice, any of these processors paired with the same GPU would deliver frame rates within a rounding error of the measurements recorded here.
On the GPU side, the RTX 2070 SUPER's nearest rivals are all within 1.5% of its average score of 20282. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, 1% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 1.2% ahead), Intel Arc B570 (20556, 1.3% ahead), and Intel Arc A750 (20582, 1.5% ahead) would produce similar GPU-bound results in Downfall. The differences are small enough that the playable settings per resolution would be the same: Ultra at 1080p, Ultra at 1440p with a narrow margin, and High at 4K.
It is worth remembering the CPU rivals are a mix of mobile and desktop parts, and the GPU rivals include both mobile and desktop cards. The database groups them by average benchmark score, so the comparison reflects overall compute capability rather than platform-specific behavior.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2135 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall. This places it in the 57.5th percentile of all tested combinations, meaning roughly 42.5% of tested combos perform better in this game. The rank reflects the GPU's 65th percentile standing and the CPU's 77th percentile standing, but the game's performance is ultimately capped by the GPU at higher resolutions.
For a horror title from 2016, this rank is reasonable. The combo is not at the top of the database, but it handles the game well at 1080p and 1440p. The 4K Ultra result is the weak point, pulling the overall rank down relative to combos with stronger GPUs that can handle 4K maximum settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the recorded average frame rates are as follows: Low averages 211.3 FPS, Medium averages 170.7 FPS, High averages 142.8 FPS, and Ultra averages 87.4 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 123.9 FPS, and every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin.
At 2560x1440, Low averages 152.4 FPS, Medium averages 124.4 FPS, High averages 103.2 FPS, and Ultra averages 60.6 FPS. The Ultra result is the only one close to the threshold, with just 0.6 FPS of headroom. The other presets provide comfortable margins.
At 3840x2160, Low averages 93.6 FPS, Medium averages 78 FPS, High averages 63 FPS, and Ultra averages 41.2 FPS. The High preset clears 60 FPS by 3 FPS, while Ultra falls 18.8 FPS short of the threshold. No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded in the dataset, so the analysis relies on average frame rates only.
The data shows a clear progression: frame rates scale down consistently as resolution increases, and the Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that fails the playability test. The 1440p Ultra result is the second-most marginal, sitting just 0.6 FPS above the threshold. For players who want a consistent 60 FPS experience without drops, the High preset at 4K (63 FPS average) or the High preset at 1440p (103.2 FPS average) would be safer choices.