Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 74 | 119 | 145 | 178 |
| 1440p QHD | 120 | 191 | 233 | 280 |
| 1080p Full HD | 168 | 268 | 292 | 313 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile for Downfall, with measured data showing that this combination can drive the game's most demanding preset well above the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution tested. Across all three resolutions, the verdict is clear: this system has enough headroom to run the game at maximum settings, making it a high-end option for this horror title.
Best Settings per Resolution
The data indicates that this combo clears the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution with all four tested presets: Low, Medium, High, and Ultra. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is therefore Ultra at each resolution, with the system maintaining substantial performance headroom.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 168 FPS. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the system is heavily unconstrained at this resolution. The 2560x1440 resolution shows the Ultra preset running at an average of 120 FPS, still exactly double the playability threshold. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset drops to an average of 74 FPS, which remains comfortably above 60 FPS but shows the expected performance cost of rendering at 4K resolution. The scaling from 168 FPS at 1080p Ultra down to 74 FPS at 4K Ultra represents a 56% reduction in average frame rate, which is a significant but not unexpected drop given the fourfold increase in pixel count.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured frame rates reveal interesting dynamics about which component matters more at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is relatively modest: 313 FPS versus 168 FPS, a 46% reduction. This relatively small gap at a resolution where the GPU is typically less stressed suggests that the Ryzen 5 5600F is keeping pace adequately, but the CPU's influence becomes more apparent when examining frame time consistency rather than just averages.
When moving from 1080p to 1440p, the Low preset drops from 313 FPS to 280 FPS, a 10.5% reduction. The Ultra preset drops from 168 FPS to 120 FPS, a 28.6% reduction. This divergence between presets indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more important as settings increase, since higher presets load more shader work and texture bandwidth onto the graphics card. The RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are clearly sufficient to handle the increased demand.
The transition from 1440p to 4K tells a similar story. Low settings drop from 280 FPS to 178 FPS (36.4% reduction), while Ultra drops from 120 FPS to 74 FPS (38.3% reduction). The nearly identical percentage reductions across presets suggest that at 4K, the resolution itself becomes the dominant factor, and the GPU's raw pixel throughput — measured at 280.6 GPixel/s — becomes the limiting resource. The CPU's role diminishes as resolution scales, which is typical for a game like Downfall that appears to be more GPU-bound at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080: The Low preset delivers an average of 313 FPS. Medium achieves 292 FPS on average, with a minimum of 248 FPS and a maximum of 335 FPS. High runs at 268 FPS average. Ultra produces 168 FPS average. The frame time variance at Medium, spanning from 248 to 335 FPS, represents a 35% spread between minimum and maximum, which is notable but remains far above the playability threshold.
2560x1440: Low averages 280 FPS. Medium runs at 233 FPS average, with a minimum of 198 FPS and a maximum of 268 FPS. High achieves 191 FPS average. Ultra delivers 120 FPS average. The Medium preset's range from 198 to 268 FPS shows a similar 35% variance pattern to the 1080p Medium result, suggesting consistent frame pacing characteristics regardless of resolution.
3840x2160: Low averages 178 FPS. Medium runs at 145 FPS average, with a minimum of 123 FPS and a maximum of 167 FPS. High achieves 119 FPS average. Ultra produces 74 FPS average. At this resolution, the Medium preset's 123 FPS minimum is still more than double the 60 FPS threshold, while the Ultra preset's average of 74 FPS leaves only 14 FPS of headroom above the playability line. The data shows that even the most demanding configuration maintains a playable experience, though the Ultra preset at 4K has the least margin for error.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Downfall at 4K with maximum settings?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the measured average frame rate is 74 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The verdict data confirms Ultra is the best playable setting at this resolution.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The highest measured average is 313 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The highest Ultra preset average is 168 FPS at 1920x1080.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209). It also outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1% and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 2.6%.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded at 1440p Medium settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the minimum measured frame rate is 198 FPS, with an average of 233 FPS and a maximum of 268 FPS. This minimum is still over three times the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: Does the Ryzen 5 5600F bottleneck the RTX 4080 in this game?
A: The data does not indicate a bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 313 FPS, and the 5600F's passmark single-thread score of 2872 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The frame rates scale consistently with resolution, suggesting balanced performance.
Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at all three resolutions?
A: Yes. The Ultra preset averages 168 FPS at 1080p, 120 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. All three values exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F's average benchmark score of 36945 places it in close competition with several alternatives. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36938, a 0% difference, making it a near-identical match in synthetic benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 (0.5% higher). In practice, any of these CPUs would likely deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates in Downfall, given the game's apparent GPU-bound nature at higher settings.
For the GPU, the RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54247 is matched closely by the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (2.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (2.7% higher). These deltas are small enough that in real-world gaming, particularly at 4K where the GPU is the primary driver, users would see very similar performance from any of these cards. The RTX 4080 SUPER in particular is essentially a peer product.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 380th out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall. This places it in the top 10.2% of all configurations tested, which is a strong result given the large pool of hardware combinations. The high rank is consistent with the measured frame rates: this system clears 60 FPS at every resolution on the most demanding preset, which many lower-ranked combos cannot achieve. The ranking also reflects the balance between the CPU's 85th percentile standing among all CPUs and the GPU's 86th percentile among all GPUs. This near-parity in relative performance suggests the combo is well-matched for this game, with neither component dramatically outclassing the other in a way that would leave performance on the table.
The Verdict
The data answers definitively: yes, this PC can run Downfall, and it can do so at maximum settings at every resolution tested. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 168 FPS average, which is 2.8 times the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra runs at 120 FPS average, exactly double the threshold. At 3840x2160, Ultra achieves 74 FPS average, which clears the playability line by 14 FPS. The verdict data confirms that all four settings — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at all three resolutions. The only configuration with any cautionary note is 4K Ultra, where the 74 FPS average leaves less headroom than the other presets, but it still comfortably exceeds the playability threshold. For users who prioritize maximum visual fidelity, this system delivers a fully playable experience at 4K Ultra. For those who prefer higher frame rates, dropping to High at 4K yields 119 FPS, or moving to 1440p Ultra provides 120 FPS with more consistent frame times. This is a high-performance combination that handles Downfall with substantial margin across the board.