Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Downfall
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 89 | 109 | 133 |
| 1440p QHD | 90 | 143 | 175 | 214 |
| 1080p Full HD | 125 | 201 | 245 | 299 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Downfall on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a decisively playable experience in Downfall at all tested resolutions, with benchmark results showing that even the most demanding preset at 4K falls just short of the 60 FPS threshold. The data confirms this combo is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures high frame rates at 1080p. The measured FPS data, which is actual hardware testing rather than estimation, provides a clear picture of what to expect across every major resolution and preset combination.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 3080 and Ryzen 5 5600F combination produces exceptional frame rates across all presets. The Low preset averages 299 FPS, which is the highest measured result in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 245 FPS with a minimum of 208 FPS and a maximum of 282 FPS. High settings yield 201 FPS on average, while the Ultra preset — the most demanding configuration — still maintains a robust 125 FPS average. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the game is far from stressing the hardware, with even the heaviest settings leaving substantial headroom above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally strong. The Low preset delivers 214 FPS on average, while Medium produces 175 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS. High settings achieve 143 FPS, and Ultra still manages a very playable 90 FPS average. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction in frame rates, typically around 25-30% lower, which is expected given the increased pixel count. However, every preset at this resolution stays comfortably above 60 FPS, with Ultra being the only setting that drops below the triple-digit range.
At 3840x2160, the performance picture becomes more nuanced. The Low preset produces 133 FPS on average, which is still highly playable. Medium settings deliver 109 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 125 FPS, maintaining a smooth experience. High settings achieve 89 FPS on average, remaining above the 60 FPS threshold. However, the Ultra preset falls to 56 FPS on average, dipping below the playable threshold and representing the only configuration in the entire dataset that fails to maintain 60 FPS. This 4K Ultra result is 37% slower than the 4K High preset, highlighting the significant cost of the highest-quality settings at maximum resolution.
The minimum FPS data, where available, reinforces the stability of the experience. At 4K Medium, the 92 FPS minimum is well above the 60 FPS threshold, and at 1440p Medium, the 149 FPS minimum shows no concerning dips. The 1080p Medium minimum of 208 FPS is similarly robust. For presets without recorded minimums — 4K Low, 4K High, 4K Ultra, 1440p Low, 1440p High, 1440p Ultra, 1080p Low, 1080p High, and 1080p Ultra — the average FPS values are high enough that sub-60 FPS drops are unlikely, though the absence of explicit minimum data means some caution is warranted for the 4K Ultra preset.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the extremely high frame rates — 299 FPS on Low and 245 FPS on Medium — suggest the CPU is playing a more significant role, as the GPU has ample capacity to render frames but the processor must keep up with the draw calls and game logic. The Ryzen 5 5600F, with its Zen 3 architecture and 6 cores / 12 threads, demonstrates sufficient single-thread performance to support these high frame rates, as evidenced by its PassMark single-thread score of 2872. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 58% drop in FPS (299 to 125), indicating that while CPU limits the Low preset, the GPU becomes progressively more involved as settings increase.
At 2560x1440, the picture shifts toward a more balanced workload. The frame rates are still high — 214 FPS on Low and 90 FPS on Ultra — but the reduction from 1080p is noticeable across all presets. The Ultra preset at 1440p delivers 90 FPS, which is 28% lower than the 1080p Ultra result of 125 FPS. This suggests the GPU is becoming the primary constraint at higher pixel counts, though the CPU remains capable enough to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory throughput for 1440p rendering, and the 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 compute handles the increased pixel workload effectively.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. The 4K Ultra preset drops to 56 FPS, while 4K High achieves 89 FPS — a 37% difference that underscores how sensitive the GPU is to the visual quality settings at this resolution. The RTX 3080's 8704 shading units and 96 ROPs are being pushed to their limits, and the data shows that the CPU has minimal impact at 4K. The 133 FPS result on 4K Low versus 56 FPS on 4K Ultra (a 58% reduction) closely mirrors the 1080p scaling pattern, but the absolute numbers are much lower, confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. The CPU's role at this resolution is largely to feed the GPU adequately, which the Ryzen 5 5600F does without issue.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Downfall at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: No. The benchmark data shows the 4K Ultra preset averages 56 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. All other 4K presets — Low, Medium, and High — are playable, with High achieving 89 FPS.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?
A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, delivering 90 FPS on average. This is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, and it provides the highest visual quality while maintaining playable performance.
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested systems for Downfall?
A: The combination ranks 1057 out of 3716 tested combos, placing it in the top 28.4% of all systems tested for this game. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile among all GPUs.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5600F or the RTX 3080 the limiting factor in this game?
A: It depends on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU plays a larger role, with frame rates ranging from 299 FPS on Low to 125 FPS on Ultra. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as evidenced by the 56 FPS Ultra result versus 133 FPS on Low.
Q: What is the highest FPS recorded for this combination?
A: The highest average FPS is 299, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This represents the performance ceiling for this system in Downfall.
Q: Does the 4K Medium preset provide a stable experience?
A: Yes. The 4K Medium preset averages 109 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 125 FPS. The minimum FPS comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold, indicating smooth performance without significant dips.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1057 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the upper-middle tier of systems tested for this game. This ranking reflects the strong but not top-tier performance of the hardware. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 36945, sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the majority of processors. Its nearest rivals — the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, -0.2% delta), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, -0.4% delta), and Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, -0.5% delta) — are all within 0.5% of its score, showing that the 5600F is tightly clustered with mid-range competitors.
The GPU, meanwhile, has an average benchmark score of 23172 and sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are notably weaker on paper: the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250, -0.3% delta), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, -0.4% delta), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276, -0.4% delta). This close clustering in synthetic benchmarks is surprising given the RTX 3080's specifications — 8704 shading units, 29.77 TFLOPS FP32, and 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth — but the PassMark G3D score of 25086 reflects real-world gaming performance that differs from pure compute metrics.
The rank of 1057 out of 3716 means this combo outperforms roughly 71.6% of all tested systems for Downfall, which aligns with the measured frame rates showing playable performance at all resolutions except 4K Ultra. The gap between the CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 68th percentile suggests the GPU is the weaker component in this pairing, which explains why 4K Ultra becomes unplayable while lower resolutions remain smooth.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Downfall, with the benchmark data showing playable performance at every resolution except 4K Ultra. At 1920x1080, all four presets — Low (299 FPS), Medium (245 FPS), High (201 FPS), and Ultra (125 FPS) — clear the 60 FPS threshold with massive headroom. At 2560x1440, the same is true, with Ultra delivering 90 FPS and Low reaching 214 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Low (133 FPS), Medium (109 FPS), and High (89 FPS) presets are all playable, but Ultra drops to 56 FPS, failing to maintain the 60 FPS standard.
The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p and 1440p support every preset at or above 60 FPS, making this combo excellent for high-refresh-rate gaming on those resolutions. At 4K, users must choose between High settings at 89 FPS or Ultra settings at 56 FPS — the latter being a marginal experience that may still be acceptable for some players, but it does not meet the defined playability threshold. For players prioritizing smooth performance over maximum visual fidelity at 4K, the High preset is the recommended choice.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 125 FPS on average. This is the most demanding setting that maintains at least 60 FPS, and it provides the highest visual quality available. The substantial headroom above 60 FPS means players could even consider enabling additional enhancements without dipping below the threshold, though the data only covers the four standard presets.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again provides the best experience, achieving 90 FPS on average. This represents the peak visual quality at this resolution while comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS playability requirement. The 90 FPS average provides a smooth experience on standard 60 Hz displays and leaves room for variable refresh rate monitors.
At 3840x2160, the High preset is the best option, averaging 89 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 56 FPS, which fails the playability threshold, so High represents the optimal balance between visual quality and performance at 4K. The 89 FPS average provides a fluid experience that exceeds 60 FPS, making it the recommended configuration for 4K gaming with this hardware.