Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Doom
FPS 2016

Doom

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
401 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
241 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
260 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
156 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
141 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
85 FPS
3.4ms Frame Time
5ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,500
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 27,325
Your GPU 54,247

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 85 104 123 141
1440p QHD 156 191 226 260
1080p Full HD 241 295 350 401

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 295
1920x1080 Low 401
1920x1080 Medium 350
1920x1080 Ultra 241
2560x1440 High 191
2560x1440 Low 260
2560x1440 Medium 226
2560x1440 Ultra 156
3840x2160 High 104
3840x2160 Low 141
3840x2160 Medium 123
3840x2160 Ultra 85

Performance Analysis: Doom on Your System

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers overwhelming performance in Doom, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution and preset combination tested. The data shows a system that is not merely capable of running the game, but one that crushes it with substantial headroom, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate displays even at maximum settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the combination produces an average of 104 FPS on High settings. Dropping to Medium yields 123 FPS average, with a minimum of 104 FPS and a maximum of 141 FPS. Low settings push the average up to 141 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a strong 85 FPS average. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 56 FPS, indicating that visual quality settings have a meaningful but not crippling impact on performance at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the frame rates scale dramatically. High settings deliver 191 FPS average, Medium reaches 226 FPS with a minimum of 192 FPS and maximum of 260 FPS, and Low produces 260 FPS average. Ultra settings remain exceptionally smooth at 156 FPS average. The jump from 4K to 1440p represents a gain of roughly 87% at High settings, from 104 FPS to 191 FPS, showing how resolution reduction unlocks substantial additional performance.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system approaches the limits of what the game engine can deliver. High settings average 295 FPS, Medium hits 350 FPS with a minimum of 297 FPS and maximum of 402 FPS, Low reaches 401 FPS average, and Ultra still holds 241 FPS. The 1080p Medium data shows a 105 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, suggesting some scene-dependent variation but with the floor still far above any playability concern. Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: the RTX 4080 and i9-14900K combination never dips below 85 FPS average, even under the heaviest load of 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark database ranks this specific CPU-GPU pairing at position 215 out of 3712 tested combinations for Doom, placing it in the top 5.8% of all systems evaluated. This rank reflects the raw capability of both components working together. The Core i9-14900K sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 79097. Its nearest rivals in synthetic testing include the Intel Core i9-14900KF with a score of 79371 (only 0.3% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus at 79574 (0.6% higher), and the AMD EPYC 7413 at 80041 (1.2% higher). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 trails at 77740, which is 1.7% lower.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 holds the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 54247. Its closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209, a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (1.1% higher), while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB reaches 55698 (2.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon 8060S tops out at 55757 (2.7% higher). This indicates that in synthetic benchmarks, several GPUs bracket the RTX 4080, yet in actual Doom gameplay, the combination's rank of 215 demonstrates that the pairing performs exceptionally well relative to the broader field of tested systems.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For users considering hardware that would behave similarly to this configuration, the nearestRivals data provides clear guidance. On the CPU side, the Intel Core i9-14900KF offers virtually identical synthetic performance, with an average score only 0.3% below the i9-14900K. This makes it a drop-in equivalent for gaming workloads like Doom. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, despite being 0.6% lower in average score, would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates. The AMD EPYC 7413, a server-class processor, scores 1.2% higher on average but would not be a practical gaming choice due to platform considerations. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, scoring 1.7% lower, would show slightly reduced performance but remains within a narrow margin.

On the GPU front, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest analog, at just 0.1% different in average score. In practice, this means the RTX 4080 SUPER would deliver essentially the same FPS in Doom across all tested settings. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 1.1% higher, which could translate to a marginal FPS improvement, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S score 2.6% and 2.7% higher respectively. These differences are small enough that any of these GPUs paired with a high-end CPU would produce a similar gameplay experience, with all combinations staying far above the 60 FPS threshold. The practical takeaway is that the i9-14900K and RTX 4080 sit in a performance cluster where near-neighbor hardware would yield nearly identical results.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Doom at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combination achieves an average of 85 FPS, which is 25 FPS above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate this combo can achieve?

A: The data shows a maximum of 401 FPS average at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The highest measured maximum FPS is 402 at 1080p Medium.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209 in average benchmarks, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080's 54247. This difference is negligible for gaming performance.

Q: Is there any resolution or preset where this system drops below 60 FPS?

A: No. The lowest average FPS recorded across all tested configurations is 85 FPS at 4K Ultra, and every other combination exceeds this figure.

Q: What percentile does the Core i9-14900K rank among all CPUs?

A: The i9-14900K sits at the 95th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 79097. Its nearest rival, the i9-14900KF, scores 79371, only 0.3% higher.

Q: How much performance is gained by dropping from 4K to 1080p at High settings?

A: The average FPS at 1080p High is 295, compared to 104 at 4K High, representing a 191 FPS increase or roughly 184% more performance.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling between resolutions reveals how each component contributes to Doom's frame rates. At 4K, the GPU is the dominant factor. The RTX 4080's raw throughput, with 9728 shading units and 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, must fill the massive pixel count of 3840x2160. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 56 FPS (141 down to 85), showing that the GPU bears the brunt of increased graphical load. The i9-14900K, with its 24 cores and 32 threads, has ample headroom at this resolution, as evidenced by the fact that even the most demanding preset stays above 85 FPS.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly. The GPU still handles the primary rendering load, but the CPU's high single-thread performance, demonstrated by its Geekbench single-core score of 2655 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5, becomes more relevant as frame rates climb toward 200-260 FPS. The scaling from 4K to 1440p at High settings (104 to 191 FPS) shows a 87 FPS gain, which is proportionally larger than the resolution pixel reduction alone would suggest, indicating that the CPU is now feeding the GPU frames more efficiently.

At 1080p, the CPU's role expands significantly. With frame rates reaching 401 FPS on Low settings, the i9-14900K's ability to maintain high instruction throughput becomes critical. The 1080p Medium data shows a minimum of 297 FPS and maximum of 402 FPS, a 105 FPS variance that reflects scene complexity changes where the CPU must process game logic and physics. The Ultra preset at 1080p still yields 241 FPS, meaning neither component becomes a bottleneck severe enough to threaten playability. Across all resolutions, the data indicates that the GPU drives performance at higher resolutions, while the CPU increasingly contributes as resolution drops and frame rates soar.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves 85 FPS average. This is the optimal choice for maximum visual fidelity at 4K, as it provides 25 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold. High settings would yield 104 FPS for those prioritizing higher refresh rates, but Ultra offers the best visual experience within the playable envelope.

For 2560x1440, Ultra settings again represent the best choice, delivering 156 FPS average. This comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold while providing the highest quality graphics. The 1440p Ultra setting is particularly compelling because it offers high visual quality at frame rates that suit 144Hz displays. Users with 165Hz or 240Hz monitors could also consider High settings at 191 FPS, but Ultra remains the data-supported recommendation for balancing quality and performance.

At 1920x1080, Ultra settings produce 241 FPS average, making it the clear choice. This preset delivers maximum quality while still achieving frame rates that exceed all but the most extreme refresh rate displays. The 241 FPS average at 1080p Ultra means the system has enough performance to drive 240Hz monitors without compromise. For users with 360Hz displays, dropping to High at 295 FPS or Medium at 350 FPS would unlock higher frame rates, but the standard recommendation is Ultra given its 241 FPS average.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: this PC can run Doom at every resolution and setting combination tested. At 3840x2160, all four presets — Ultra, High, Medium, and Low — are playable, with Ultra delivering 85 FPS average. The 2560x1440 resolution similarly supports all settings, with Ultra at 156 FPS average. At 1920x1080, Ultra achieves 241 FPS average, and even the most demanding settings never dip below the 60 FPS threshold. The comboRankInGame of 215 out of 3712 places this system in the upper echelon of tested configurations. With the i9-14900K at the 95th CPU percentile and the RTX 4080 at the 86th GPU percentile, the hardware demonstrates that it is not just sufficient for Doom, but overwhelmingly so. The minimum recorded average FPS across all tests is 85, which means this system could maintain smooth gameplay even with significant background load or future game updates. For any display up to 4K resolution, this configuration provides a definitive answer: yes, it runs Doom exceptionally well.