Doom

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile for Doom (2016), as measured across all three primary resolutions. Benchmark data indicates this combination not only meets but far exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested setting, from Low to Ultra, at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and even 3840x2160. The measured frame rates suggest a system with substantial headroom, making it a candidate for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions and maximum visual fidelity at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combination produces an average of 76.3 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that maximum graphical quality is achievable at 4K resolution.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620. It trails the Intel Xeon 6505P by a marginal -0.2%, while it leads the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6%. The data shows a tightly clustered group at this performance tier.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER falls into the 83rd percentile when compared to all GPUs in the database. This places it well above the median, though below the top-tier enthusiast cards.

Q: Which component has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 53620, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 43223. The processor's score is considerably higher, though these metrics are not directly comparable as they measure different workloads.

Q: Is the game playable at 1440p with High settings?

A: Yes, the data shows an average of 169 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. This is nearly three times the playability threshold, offering a very smooth experience on high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: What is the best setting for 1080p according to the verdict data?

A: The verdict indicates Ultra is the best setting at 1920x1080, delivering an average of 209 FPS. All four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are considered playable at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a clear pattern regarding component scaling in Doom. The frame rate drops are consistent when moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, and then again from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160, which points to the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases. For instance, at Ultra settings, the average FPS falls from 209 at 1080p to 138.7 at 1440p, a reduction of about 33.6%, and then further down to 76.3 at 4K, another 45% decrease. This steep decline at higher resolutions is characteristic of a GPU-bound workload.

However, the CPU’s role is not negligible. The Intel Core i7-14700F, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, provides enough headroom to ensure the GPU is not starved of data. The single-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958, is crucial for the game's core logic and draw call submission. At 1080p, where the GPU load is lower, the CPU's ability to maintain high frame rates is more apparent; the 346.7 FPS at Low settings demonstrates that the processor can support frame rates far beyond typical display refresh rates. The data implies that while the RTX 4070 SUPER dictates the ultimate visual ceiling at 4K, the i7-14700F is more than sufficient to avoid holding back performance at lower resolutions.

Comparing the scaling between presets at the same resolution offers further insight. At 4K, dropping from Ultra to High yields a substantial 14 FPS gain (from 76.3 to 90.3), while the jump from High to Medium adds another 19 FPS (to 109.3). This suggests that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth are heavily taxed by the Ultra preset's effects. The fact that the RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and a 504.2 GB/s bandwidth is likely a key factor in maintaining playable frame rates even at 4K Ultra, as the game's texture data fits comfortably within the memory pool.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Doom, the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER pair ranks 603rd out of 3712 tested combos. This places it in the top 16.2% of all systems tested, a strong showing that underscores its high-performance nature. The rank reflects the measured average FPS across all tested settings and resolutions, with the absolute scores being high enough to push this combo well above the median performer.

The percentile data for the individual components aligns with this ranking. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The combination of two components that are both in the top quartile of their respective categories results in a system that is exceptionally well-balanced for gaming. The rank of 603 suggests that while there are many faster combinations, this specific pairing offers a level of performance that will satisfy the vast majority of users, particularly those targeting high refresh rates at 1440p or smooth 4K gameplay.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware could deliver similar results. For the processor, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is the closest competitor, with an average score just 0.6% lower than the i7-14700F. This indicates that a system with a Ryzen 9 7900X and an RTX 4070 SUPER would likely produce nearly identical frame rates in Doom. The Intel Xeon 6505P and Xeon Phi 7290 are also listed as rivals, though their performance deltas are negligible (-0.2% and +0.3% respectively), suggesting that in a gaming context, these server-class chips would perform on par with the consumer i7.

On the GPU side, the landscape is more interesting due to the inclusion of mobile parts. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has an average score that is -1% relative to the RTX 4070 SUPER, meaning the desktop card is slightly faster. This is a notable data point, suggesting that a laptop with an RTX 4090 Mobile could offer comparable gaming performance to this desktop configuration. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 and its 24 GB variant are also listed as near-equal performers, with deltas of -0.2% and -0.1%, respectively. These professional cards, while not designed for gaming, show that the RTX 4070 SUPER's raw compute power is in a specific performance bracket that has several cross-market equivalents.

When considering a system build, a user could expect similar in-game results by pairing the i7-14700F with an RTX 4090 Mobile (in a laptop) or by using a Ryzen 9 7900X with the same GPU. The deltaPct values suggest that the performance differences between these configurations would be within the margin of error for real-world benchmarking, making them all viable alternatives depending on platform preferences.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across the board. The Low preset delivers an average of 346.7 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. Medium settings produce 302.7 FPS, High settings yield 256.4 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains an average of 209 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system is heavily CPU-bound at this resolution, as the GPU has significant headroom to render frames as fast as the processor can submit them.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling begins to show a dip in performance. The Low preset still achieves a very high 226.8 FPS, followed by Medium at 194.4 FPS and High at 169 FPS. Ultra settings at 1440p drop to 138.7 FPS, which is still more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The reductions from 1080p to 1440p are roughly 35% across all presets, indicating a proportional increase in GPU workload.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the determining factor. The Low preset manages 120.9 FPS, which is still a very playable number. Medium settings drop to 109.3 FPS, and High settings to 90.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, which pushes the GPU to its limits, still delivers a respectable 76.3 FPS. The data shows a clear trend: even at 4K with maximum settings, the combination never falls below the playability threshold, though the margin of headroom shrinks considerably compared to lower resolutions.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally shows that this PC can run Doom with exceptional performance. The verdict by resolution confirms that all four presets are playable at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160, all exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 1080p, the system is capable of supporting 240Hz or even 360Hz monitors, with the Ultra preset hitting 209 FPS. At 1440p, the Ultra preset averages 138.7 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate 144Hz displays.

The most demanding scenario, 4K Ultra, produces an average of 76.3 FPS. While this is comfortably above 60 FPS, it does not leave as much headroom for demanding scenes or future driver overhead. However, the data shows that for the vast majority of gameplay, the system will remain smooth and responsive. For users with a 4K 60Hz display, this combination allows for maximum graphical fidelity without compromise. For those with 4K 120Hz or 144Hz panels, the High or Medium presets, which offer 90.3 and 109.3 FPS respectively, would be better choices to fully utilize the display's refresh rate.

Best Settings per Resolution

1920x1080: The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 209 FPS. All lower presets also clear the threshold, but Ultra provides the best visual quality without sacrificing performance.

2560x1440: At this resolution, the best setting is also Ultra, with an average of 138.7 FPS. This provides a high level of visual detail while maintaining a frame rate that is well-suited for 144Hz monitors.

3840x2160: For 4K gaming, the best setting is Ultra, achieving an average of 76.3 FPS. While there is not a massive amount of headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, the data confirms that the game runs smoothly at maximum settings. The High preset, at 90.3 FPS, offers a more comfortable margin for those who prefer a buffer against frame drops, but Ultra is the optimal choice for visual fidelity based on the measured average.