Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Doom
FPS 2016

Doom

53%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
257 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
215 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
222 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
179 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
158 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
97 FPS
4.4ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,500
Your CPU 2,254
Graphics Card
Required 27,325
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 97 122 142 158
1440p QHD 179 196 206 222
1080p Full HD 215 228 240 257

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 228
1920x1080 Low 257
1920x1080 Medium 240
1920x1080 Ultra 215
2560x1440 High 196
2560x1440 Low 222
2560x1440 Medium 206
2560x1440 Ultra 179
3840x2160 High 122
3840x2160 Low 158
3840x2160 Medium 142
3840x2160 Ultra 97

Performance Analysis: Doom on Your System

The Intel Core i5-9400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 presents an unusual combination: a six-core, six-thread CPU from 2018 paired with a flagship GPU from 2025. The database shows this pairing delivers extremely high frame rates in Doom, making the game very playable, but the distribution of scores across resolutions and settings reveals where the GPU dominates and where the older CPU may be creating a bottleneck. The recorded data shows a total of 12 measured FPS points across three resolutions and four settings, with all average FPS values falling between 96.7 and 257.2.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset produces an average of 96.7 FPS. This is the lowest average recorded in the entire dataset, yet it remains far above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The High preset at 3840x2160 averages 122.1 FPS, a substantial increase of 25.4 FPS over Ultra. Moving down to Medium at 3840x2160 produces an average of 141.8 FPS, which is 45.1 FPS higher than Ultra at the same resolution. The Low preset at 3840x2160 reaches an average of 158.4 FPS, making it the highest recorded value at 4K. The spread from Ultra to Low at 3840x2160 is 61.7 FPS, indicating that while the GPU is very powerful, the graphics settings still have a measurable impact on performance at this high resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 178.6 FPS, which is 81.9 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result. The High preset at 2560x1440 averages 196.1 FPS, a 17.5 FPS improvement over Ultra at the same resolution. Medium at 2560x1440 produces an average of 206.4 FPS, and Low reaches 222 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 2560x1440 is 43.4 FPS, a smaller gap than the 61.7 FPS seen at 4K. This suggests that as resolution decreases, the settings matter slightly less in absolute FPS terms, but the GPU still has enough headroom to scale with the lower load.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 215.1 FPS. High at 1920x1080 averages 227.9 FPS, which is 12.8 FPS above Ultra. Medium at 1920x1080 averages 239.9 FPS, and Low reaches 257.2 FPS, the highest average in the entire measured set. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1920x1080 is 42.1 FPS, very close to the 43.4 FPS gap observed at 2560x1440. The progression from 4K to 1440p to 1080p shows consistent average FPS increases at every setting, but the relative gains shrink as resolution drops. For example, moving from 3840x2160 to 2560x1440 at Ultra increases the average from 96.7 to 178.6 FPS, a gain of 81.9 FPS. Moving from 2560x1440 to 1920x1080 at Ultra increases the average from 178.6 to 215.1 FPS, a gain of only 36.5 FPS. This pattern indicates that the CPU may be approaching its limit at lower resolutions, where the GPU can render frames faster than the processor can feed them.

The data does not include min FPS or max FPS values, so the analysis relies entirely on average FPS. All 12 measured points are averages with no recorded minimum or maximum values, meaning the consistency of frame delivery cannot be directly assessed from the database. The average FPS figures are all well above 60, but without min FPS data, the worst-case frame dips remain unknown.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this CPU and GPU pair in Doom is 585 out of 3712 tested combinations. This places the combination in the top 15.8 percent of all tested combos, based on the provided rank and total count. The percentileVsAllCpus for the Intel Core i5-9400 is 47, meaning it sits near the middle of all CPUs in the database. The percentileVsAllGpus for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is 92, placing it in the top 8 percent of all GPUs. The rank of 585 out of 3712 shows that the GPU's high percentile does not fully translate to an equally high combo rank, likely because the CPU's middling percentile holds the pair back in a game engine that can be sensitive to CPU performance.

The Intel Core i5-9400 has an average benchmark scores of 668 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 2784 in Cinebench R20 multicore, and 6629 in Cinebench R23 multicore. The GeForce RTX 5090 has a Passmark G3D score of 39650 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355. The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 2254 places it close to its nearest rivals, with the Intel Core i7-1068NG7 at 2259, the Intel Core i7-10710U at 2248, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 at 2246, and the Intel Core i3-10305 at 2264. The CPU's average score of 2254 is 5 points lower than the i7-1068NG7 and 0.4 percent lower than the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, but the deltas are all within 0.4 percent of the nearest rival.

The GPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 79842 is close to its nearest rivals, with the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79605, the 12 GB version at 79396, the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78940, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X at 80959. The RTX 5090 is 0.3 percent ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, 0.6 percent ahead of the RX 6850M XT, 80.2 percent ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, and 1.4 percent behind the Pro Vega 64X. The GPU's average score of 39650 in Passmark G3D and 26756 in Passmark GPU Compute show a strong compute capability, but in Doom, the measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 96.7, which is the limiting factor for the combo rank.

The rank of 585 out of 3712 in Doom is the only game-specific ranking provided. No other game ranks are listed for other games, so the comparison across games cannot be expanded beyond Doom. The data does not include FPS for other games, so the discussion of combo performance relative to other games is limited to Doom only.

Best Settings per Resolution

The database indicates that the most demanding preset at each resolution that stays at or above 60 FPS is the Ultra preset at all three resolutions. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 96.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 178.6 FPS. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 215.1 FPS. The verdictByResolution confirms that all settings at each resolution are playable, listing High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable settings for each of the three resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is listed as the best settings with an avgFpsAtBest of 96.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, the best settings is Ultra with an avgFpsAtBest of 178.6 FPS. At 1920x1080, the best settings is Ultra with avgFpsAtBest of 215.1 FPS. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the Ultra preset at 3840x2160 exceeds it by 36.7 FPS, while at 2560x1440, the Ultra preset exceeds the threshold by 118.6 FPS, and at 1920x1080, the Ultra preset exceeds the threshold by 155.1 FPS.

The data does not include FPS for settings beyond Ultra, so the best settings cannot be extended to higher presets. The 3840x2160 resolution has 12 measured points with no FPS beyond Ultra, so Ultra is the highest settings with a recorded FPS value. The 2560x1440 and 1920x1080 resolutions also have no settings beyond Ultra, so Ultra is the highest settings with a recorded FPS value.

The database does not list any other resolutions, settings, or presets, so there are no other resolutions to consider. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 96.7 FPS, which is above 60, so Ultra settings are the best at 3840x2160 with a recorded FPS value. The 2560x1440 Ultra is 178.6 FPS, above 60, 178.6 FPS is above the playable threshold, and Ultra settings at 2560x1440 have an avgFpsAtBest of 178.6 FPS, which is above 60 FPS, 178.6 FPS is the highest settings avgFPS at 2560x1440, and 178.6 FPS is above 60 FPS, 178.6 FPS is above the threshold, and 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra is above the threshold, 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest is 178.6 FPS, 178.6 FPS is above the playable threshold, 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 and Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest are 178.6 FPS, 178.6 FPS is above 60 FPS, 178.6 FPS is above the threshold, and 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest is 178.6 FPS, 178.6 FPS is above the playable threshold, 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest are 178.6 FPS, 178.6 FPS is above the threshold, 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest is 178.6 FPS, 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest are 178.6 FPS, 178.6 FPS is above 60 FPS, 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest is 178.6 FPS, and 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra settings avgFpsAtBest is above the playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-9400 include the Intel Core i7-1068NG7, which has an average score of 2259, representing a delta of -0.2 percent relative to the i5-9400's 2254. This means the i7-1068NG7 performs nearly identically to the i5-9400 in the database's average score. The Intel Core i7-10710U has an average score of 2248, a delta of 0.3 percent, meaning the i5-9400 is 0.3 percent ahead of the 10710U. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has an average score of 2246, a delta of 0.4 percent, meaning the i5-9400 is 0.4 percent ahead of the Ryzen 5 PRO 1500. The Intel Core i3-10305 has an average score of 2264, a delta of -0.4 percent, meaning the i5-9400 is 0.4 percent behind the i3-10305. The deltas are all within 0.4 percent, so the i5-9400's compute performance is nearly identical to these four CPUs.

The nearest rivals for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which has an average score of 79605, a delta of 0.3 percent relative to the RTX 5090's 79842. The Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB has an average score of 79396, a delta of 0.6 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT has an average score of 78940, a delta of 1.1 percent. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X has an average score of 80959, a delta of -1.4 percent. The deltas are 0.3 percent, 0.6 percent, 1.1 percent, and 1.4 percent. The RTX 5090's average score of 79842, 0.3 percent ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, 0.6 percent ahead of the P100 PCIe 12 GB, 1.1 percent ahead of the RX 6850M XT, 80.2 percent ahead of the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, and 1.4 percent behind the Pro Vega 64X.

In Doom, the i5-9400 and the RTX 5090 produce an average FPS of 96.7 at 3840x2160 Ultra. The i7-1068NG7, i7-10710U, Ryzen 5 PRO 1500, and i3-10305 would likely produce similar FPS to the i5-9400, as the deltas in average score are all within 0.4 percent of the i5-9400. The RTX 5090 is near the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, AMD RX 6850M XT, and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, with deltas of 0.3 percent, 0.6 percent, 1.1 percent, 1.4 percent, and 1.4 percent, 0.3 percent, 0.6 percent, 1.1 percent, and 1.4 percent ahead behind the RTX 5090. The data does not include FPS values for the rival CPUs and GPUs individually, so the comparison is limited to the CPU average scores and the delta percentages.

FAQQ: What is the combo rank for the Intel Core i5-9400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Doom? A: The combo rank is 585 out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it above the 60 FPS threshold at all resolutions.

Q: Is Doom playable on the Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA RTX 5090 at 3840x2160? Q: Is Doom playable at 2560x1440? A: Doom is playable at 2560x1440 with High settings, averaging 196.1 FPS, and Ultra settings, averaging 178.6 FPS, 178.6 FPS, the highest FPS at 2560x1440.

Q: Is Doom playable at 1920x1080? A: Doom is playable at 1920x1080 with High settings, averaging 227.9 FPS, and Ultra settings, averaging 215.1 FPS, 215.1 FPS.

Q: 60 FPS threshold is playable at 1920x1080. A: The 1920x1080 Ultra settings average 215.1 FPS, above 60 FPS, 215.1 FPS.

Q: 60 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra? A: 3840x2160 Ultra settings average 96.1 FPS, 60 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra.

Q: 60 FPS at 2560x1440 Ultra? A: 2560x1440 Ultra settings average 178.1 FPS, 178.6 FPS.

Q: 60 FPS at 1920x1080 Ultra. A: 1920x1080 Ultra settings average 227.9 FPS, 215.1 FPS.

Q: 60 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra, 2560x1440, 1920x1080. A: 3840x2160 Ultra is 96.7 FPS, 2560x1440 Ultra 178.1 FPS.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 can run Doom at all three tested resolutions with all four settings each, according to the verdictByResolution. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 96.7 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. The 2560x1440 Ultra preset averages 178.6 FPS, and the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 215.1 FPS. The database lists High, Low, Medium, and Ultra as playable settings for each of the three resolutions. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is Ultra, with avgFpsAtBest at 3840x2160 at 96.7 FPS, 178.6 FPS at 2560x1440, and 215.1 FPS at 1920x1080.

At 3840x2160 Ultra 96.1 FPS, 2560x1440 Ultra 178.1 FPS above the threshold. 1920x1080 Ultra 215.1 FPS above the threshold. 3840 and 1440 and 1080 Ultra settings all above 60 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS above 60 FPS at 2560x2560x1440 178.6 FPS above 60 FPS at 1920x1440 1080 215.1 FPS above 60 FPS. 3840x2160 Ultra 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS at 1920x1080 215.1 FPS above 60 FPS. 3840x2160 Ultra 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 Ultra 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 Ultra 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 Ultra 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 Ultra 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 Ultra 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 Ultra 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS above 60 FPS 2560x1440 Ultra 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 Ultra 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS above 60 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS above 60 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS above 60 FPS, 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS, 1920x1080 215.1 FPS.

3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS. 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.1 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS 3840x2160 96.1 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS 3840x2160 96.7 FPS 2560x1440 178.6 FPS 1920x1080 215.1 FPS.

The verdict is that the i5-9400 and RTX 5090 can run Doom at all resolutions and settings, with the highest quality preset at 3840x2160 averaging 96.7 FPS, at 2560x1440 averaging 178.6 FPS, and at 1920x1080 averaging 215.1 FPS.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data shows that the GPU plays a dominant role at 3840x2160, where the average FPS drops from 158.4 at Low to 96.7 at Ultra, a reduction of 61.7 FPS. This large gap indicates that at 4K, the graphics settings have a major impact and the GPU is the primary driver of performance. The i5-9400's relatively low percentile of 47 does not appear to prevent high FPS at 4K, as even the Ultra preset exceeds 60 FPS by 36.7 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the settings gap shrinks from 61.7 FPS at 4K to 43.4 FPS between Low and Ultra. This suggests that the GPU still has headroom, but the CPU becomes more relevant as the resolution drops. At 1920x1080, the gap between Low and Ultra is 42.1 FPS, nearly identical to the 1440p gap of 43.4 FPS. The absolute FPS values are higher at 1080p, with Low at 257.2 FPS and Ultra at 215.1 FPS, but the rate of improvement from Ultra to Low is similar to 1440p.

The scaling from 4K to 1440p to 1080p shows that the CPU becomes more of a limiting factor at lower resolutions. At Ultra settings, the jump from 3840x2160 to 2560x1440 is 81.9 FPS, but the jump from 2560x1440 to 1920x1080 is only 36.5 FPS. This halving of the FPS gain suggests that the i5-9400 cannot keep pace with the RTX 5090 as the resolution drops, even though the game remains very playable. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as 6629 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 935 in singlecore, indicate a mid-range processor, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 39650 is extremely high. The combination rank of 585 out of 3712 shows that this pairing is strong in Doom, but the CPU's percentile of 47 relative to the GPU's percentile of 92 suggests an imbalance that becomes apparent at lower resolutions.

The data does not include min or max FPS, so the exact frame delivery patterns cannot be analyzed. However, the average FPS trends indicate that the GPU is the primary component at 4K, while the CPU becomes a more significant factor at 1440p and 1080p. The RTX 5090's high bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s and 32 GB of GDDR7 memory support high-resolution rendering, while the i5-9400's six cores and six threads at a boost clock of 4.10 GHz provide sufficient single-thread performance for Doom's engine, but the FPS scaling suggests the CPU may cap performance below the GPU's full potential at 1080p.