Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Doom
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 42 | 50 | 57 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 78 | 92 | 106 |
| 1080p Full HD | 99 | 121 | 143 | 164 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Doom on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a solid 1080p and 1440p experience in Doom, but it falls short of the 60 FPS target at 4K. Benchmark data shows the system achieves playable frame rates across all presets at both 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, with the Ultra preset hitting 99 FPS and 64 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, however, even the Low preset only manages 57 FPS, making 4K unplayable by the 60 FPS standard.
FAQ
Q: What is the best playable setting at 1920x1080?
A: The Ultra preset runs at 99 FPS average, which is the highest quality setting that maintains 60+ FPS. The data shows no playable settings are excluded at this resolution, so you can use the maximum visual quality.
Q: Can this system run Doom at 2560x1440?
A: Yes, all four settings—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—stay at or above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset delivers 64 FPS average, while High reaches 78 FPS and Medium 92 FPS.
Q: Is 4K resolution viable with this hardware?
A: No. At 3840x2160, the best result is 57 FPS on Low settings. Medium averages 50 FPS, High drops to 42 FPS, and Ultra falls to 35 FPS. None of these meet the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitors?
A: The Intel Arc B570 scores 20,556 in average benchmarks, sitting within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582). It also trails the AMD Radeon R9 M390X by 0.5% and beats the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M by 0.4%.
Q: What is the CPU's performance standing among all tested processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58,386. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, scores 58,323, a 0.1% difference.
Q: Does the system maintain consistent frame times at lower resolutions?
A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the frame rate ranges from 121 FPS minimum to 164 FPS maximum, showing strong consistency. The 2560x1440 Medium preset similarly shows a tight 79-106 FPS range, indicating stable performance.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering 99 FPS average. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by 39 frames and represents the highest quality option available. The High preset provides 121 FPS, Medium hits 143 FPS, and Low runs at 164 FPS, but Ultra offers the best visual fidelity while remaining comfortably playable.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again leads with 64 FPS average, just 4 frames above the 60 FPS minimum. High delivers 78 FPS, Medium 92 FPS, and Low 106 FPS. The margin at Ultra is thinner than at 1080p, but it still meets the playability standard. Players seeking more headroom could drop to High for 14 additional frames.
At 3840x2160, no settings achieve 60 FPS. The closest is Low at 57 FPS, followed by Medium at 50 FPS, High at 42 FPS, and Ultra at 35 FPS. The verdict data lists no playable settings at this resolution, meaning the system cannot sustain smooth gameplay at 4K regardless of quality level.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions reveals how the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher pixel counts. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset drops from 99 FPS to 64 FPS, a 35% reduction. Moving to 3840x2160, the same preset falls to 35 FPS, another 45% decline. This progressive drop aligns with the Arc B570's 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 160-bit bus, which constrain throughput as pixel load increases.
The CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 100 FPS. At 1920x1080 Low, the system produces 164 FPS, and Medium reaches 143 FPS. These high frame rates indicate the Ryzen 7 9850X3D's 8 cores and 16 threads, boosted by 96 MB of shared L3 cache, can feed the GPU sufficiently at 1080p. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all processors supports this interpretation.
At 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward the GPU. The gap between Low (106 FPS) and Ultra (64 FPS) is 42 FPS, showing that settings changes have a larger impact than resolution scaling alone. The GPU's 65th percentile standing among all GPUs suggests it handles mid-range loads well but struggles when pushed to 4K. The data indicates the CPU maintains headroom at 1440p, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck at 4K where even Low settings cannot reach 60 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals in benchmark scores offer comparable frame rates in Doom. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, just 0.1% below the B570's 20,556, suggesting nearly identical performance in this title. The Intel Arc A750 is equally close at 20,582, a 0.1% advantage. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20,480, 0.4% slower) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, 0.5% faster) round out the cluster, meaning any of these GPUs would produce similar FPS numbers at the tested settings.
On the CPU side, the Ryzen 7 9850X3D's average score of 58,386 places it near the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58,323, 0.1% slower) and the Intel Core i9-14900 (58,115, 0.5% slower). The Intel Xeon w5-2545 (58,504, 0.2% faster) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (58,826, 0.7% faster) are also within a percentage point. These processors would deliver essentially the same CPU-bound performance in Doom at 1080p, where the frame rates exceed 120 FPS.
The practical implication is that swapping the B570 for an RTX 3070 Mobile or Arc A750 would yield nearly identical results—the 4K limitation persists, and 1440p Ultra remains playable at 64 FPS. Similarly, replacing the CPU with any of the four rivals wouldn't change the outcome, as the GPU dominates at 1440p and 4K while the CPU's advantage is only visible at 1080p High and above.
The Verdict
This system can run Doom at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with all presets achieving 60 FPS or better. At 1080p, the Ultra preset runs at 99 FPS, providing a smooth experience with maximum visual quality. The 1440p Ultra preset hits 64 FPS, clearing the threshold by a narrow margin, while High delivers 78 FPS for additional headroom.
At 3840x2160, the system fails to meet the 60 FPS standard at any setting. The Low preset's 57 FPS is the closest result, but it still falls short. Medium, High, and Ultra produce 50, 42, and 35 FPS respectively, all below the playability threshold. The verdict data confirms no playable settings exist at 4K.
For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combination is capable and consistent. The 1440p Ultra result is the standout achievement, offering high-fidelity visuals at a playable frame rate. The 4K shortfall is notable but not unexpected given the GPU's mid-range positioning and 10 GB memory capacity.
How This Combo Ranks
Among 3,712 tested combinations, this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 2,987th in Doom performance. That places it in the lower 20% of systems tested, reflecting the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong 92nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 65th percentile standing suggest the pairing underperforms relative to what each component achieves individually in other contexts.
The rank is driven primarily by the 4K results, where the system cannot reach 60 FPS. At 1080p and 1440p, the combination performs well, but the overall ranking weighs all tested scenarios. The 2,987th position indicates that many other combinations deliver better 4K performance, even if this system excels at lower resolutions. For players targeting 1080p or 1440p, the rank understates the practical experience, but for 4K enthusiasts, it correctly signals inadequacy.