Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Doom
FPS 2016

Doom

89%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
183 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
110 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
70 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
66 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
40 FPS
7.4ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,500
Your CPU 37,943
Graphics Card
Required 27,325
Your GPU 23,021

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 40 45 59 66
1440p QHD 70 87 102 118
1080p Full HD 110 135 162 183

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 135
1920x1080 Low 183
1920x1080 Medium 162
1920x1080 Ultra 110
2560x1440 High 87
2560x1440 Low 118
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 Ultra 70
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 66
3840x2160 Medium 59
3840x2160 Ultra 40

Performance Analysis: Doom on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a thoroughly playable experience in Doom across the vast majority of configurations, with performance scaling predictably from a demanding 4K environment down to high-refresh-rate 1080p. The data shows a strong pairing where the GPU is the primary driver at higher resolutions, but the CPU’s capabilities become increasingly relevant as settings are lowered. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and how this specific combo compares to other hardware configurations in the database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly pushed to its limits. The Ultra preset yields an average of 39.6 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Dropping to High settings improves the average to 45 FPS, still shy of smooth gameplay. The Medium preset nearly hits the target with an average of 59.2 FPS, but it is the Low preset that crosses the line, delivering an average of 66.4 FPS. This makes Low the only viable 4K setting, and it does so with a comfortable margin above the threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440 reveals a much healthier performance picture. The Ultra preset achieves an average of 70 FPS, which is already above the playable threshold. High settings push the average to 87.2 FPS, while Medium reaches 101.8 FPS. The Low preset delivers a very high 118.1 FPS average. Every preset at this resolution is playable, with a clear progression from demanding to lightweight settings.

At 1920x1080, the combo excels, providing high refresh-rate performance. Even the most demanding Ultra preset averages 109.6 FPS. The High preset reaches 135.4 FPS, and Medium jumps to 162.4 FPS. The Low preset peaks at 182.9 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors. The scaling here shows that the system is well-balanced for 1080p, with no preset causing a significant bottleneck.

The performance deltas between presets are notable. At 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra is 26.8 FPS (from 66.4 down to 39.6), indicating the GPU is heavily taxed. At 1440p, the same preset swing results in a 48.1 FPS difference, showing more headroom. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 73.3 FPS, highlighting the system’s ability to scale with reduced graphical load.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution changes. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The average FPS drops drastically from 66.4 at Low to 39.6 at Ultra, a 40.4% reduction. This is a classic sign of pixel-pushing dominance, where the Intel Arc B580’s rendering throughput is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 9700X has ample headroom, as evidenced by the fact that even the fastest 4K setting cannot exceed 66.4 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the balance begins to even out, but the GPU still leads. The Ultra preset’s 70 FPS is a substantial improvement over 4K Ultra’s 39.6 FPS, a 76.8% performance increase. This suggests that the GPU is no longer as constrained, and the CPU’s role becomes more significant. However, the fact that Low settings still only reach 118.1 FPS indicates the CPU is not the primary limiter; otherwise, we would see a smaller spread between presets.

At 1920x1080, the CPU’s influence becomes more apparent. The Ultra preset’s 109.6 FPS is likely close to the CPU’s maximum frame delivery capability for this game. The jump to Low settings yields 182.9 FPS, which is a 66.9% increase over Ultra. This scaling, while still substantial, is less than at 1440p, suggesting the CPU is starting to cap the maximum achievable frame rate. The Ryzen 7 9700X, with its high single-thread performance, proves sufficient to feed the GPU, but the data shows diminishing returns as resolution drops.

The scaling between resolutions reinforces this. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings reduces the average FPS from 109.6 to 70, a 36.1% drop. Moving from 1440p to 4K at Ultra reduces it further to 39.6, a 43.4% drop. This non-linear scaling is typical of GPU-bound scenarios, confirming that the Arc B580 is the dominant factor in determining overall performance, regardless of the CPU’s capabilities.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X are all extremely close in average benchmark score, indicating that users with these CPUs would see nearly identical performance in Doom. The Intel Core i9-14901E is a direct match, with a deltaPct of 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is also within 0.1%, while the Intel Core 5 211E is 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 trails by 0.4%. In practical terms, any of these processors would yield the same frame rates as the 9700X in this game, as the benchmark differences are negligible.

For the Intel Arc B580, the rival landscape is more varied. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP has a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning it is essentially equivalent in overall compute performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% behind, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is 0.7% ahead. The NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% behind. While these GPUs have different architectural strengths, their average scores suggest they would produce similar frame rates in Doom. The RTX 3080, being slightly faster, might offer a few extra FPS in GPU-bound scenarios, but the differences are small enough that the overall playability verdict would remain unchanged.

A user with a Ryzen 7 9700X paired with any of these rival GPUs should expect a very similar experience. Conversely, an Arc B580 paired with one of the rival CPUs would also behave comparably. The combination of a 9700X and an Arc B580 sits in a performance tier where the delta between these alternatives is minor, making the choice largely irrelevant for this specific game.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + Intel Arc B580 combination holds the rank of 2834 out of 3712 tested combos in Doom. This places it in the 76th percentile of all systems in the database, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the tested configurations. This is a solid result, especially considering the component choices. The combo rank reflects not just the raw power of the parts, but also their synergy in this particular title.

The rank is likely buoyed by the strong performance of the Ryzen 7 9700X, which sits in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The Arc B580, while competent, only reaches the 68th percentile among GPUs. However, the game’s optimization for multi-threaded CPUs and the GPU’s raw compute power combine to produce a result that is greater than the sum of its parts. The data suggests that this combo is a better match for Doom than many other pairings that might have a higher-end GPU but a weaker CPU, or vice versa.

Being ranked 2834 out of 3712 means there is a substantial number of faster systems, but also a large majority of slower ones. For a mid-to-high-range pairing, this is an expected outcome. The ranking confirms that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it is far above average and more than capable of delivering a smooth experience in this game, as evidenced by the measured FPS data.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Doom at 4K with the Ultra preset?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 39.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The only playable setting at 4K is Low, which averages 66.4 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The Ultra preset is the best choice at 2560x1440, as it delivers an average of 70 FPS, which is above the playable threshold. This allows you to enjoy maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU is still the primary bottleneck, but the CPU’s role is more significant than at higher resolutions. The difference between the Ultra preset (109.6 FPS) and the Low preset (182.9 FPS) shows the GPU is still taxed, but the CPU is capable of delivering high frame rates when needed.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in this context?

A: The RTX 3080 has a 0.7% higher average benchmark score than the Arc B580. In practical terms, this means you would see nearly identical frame rates in Doom, with the RTX 3080 potentially being a few FPS faster in specific scenes.

Q: Is this combo ranked highly among all tested systems?

A: The combo is ranked 2834 out of 3712 tested configurations, placing it in the 76th percentile. It outperforms the majority of systems in the database, making it a strong performer for this game.

Q: What is the highest FPS achievable with this system?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 182.9, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is the peak performance for this combination in Doom.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is Low, which delivers 66.4 FPS. The Medium preset comes close at 59.2 FPS, but it misses the threshold. Therefore, Low is the only recommended setting for 4K.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the best choice, as it averages 70 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality while still being comfortably above the playable threshold. All other presets also exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra offers the best experience.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is again the best option, achieving an average of 109.6 FPS. This is more than enough for smooth gameplay and provides the full graphical experience. The system has enough headroom to run the game at maximum settings without any compromise.