Doom

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is an exceptionally strong combination for running Doom, delivering frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested resolution and preset. The data shows a system capable of maxing out the game’s Ultra settings at 4K while still maintaining an average of 92.8 FPS, with performance scaling impressively at lower resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for this CPU and GPU combo at 3840x2160?

A: The data shows that Ultra is the best playable settings preset at 4K, with an average FPS of 92.8. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, confirming that the combo can handle maximum graphical fidelity at this resolution.

Q: How does the RTX 5080’s average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon 8060S, scores 55757, which is a 0.6% difference in the RTX 5080’s favor. Another close rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, scores 57367, which is 2.2% higher than the RTX 5080.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7500F a high-performing CPU relative to all others?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7500F sits in the 77th percentile when compared to all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 24964, placing it just 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-11850H (score 24935) and 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-13620H (score 24911).

Q: Which component is more critical for performance at 1920x1080 resolution?

A: At 1920x1080, the GPU becomes the primary performance driver. The frame rates are extremely high, ranging from 257.3 FPS at Ultra to 400.3 FPS at Low, which indicates that the RTX 5080 is capable of feeding frames far faster than the CPU’s single-thread performance could bottleneck, even though the Ryzen 5 7500F has a strong single-thread score of 3218 in Cinebench R23.

Q: Can this system run the game at 2560x1440 with all settings maxed out?

A: Yes, benchmark results indicate that Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 163 FPS. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, showing that the combination has significant headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 3840x2160?

A: At 3840x2160, the difference is substantial. Low settings average 148.6 FPS, while Ultra settings average 92.8 FPS. This represents a 55.8 FPS drop when moving from the lowest to the highest preset, indicating that the Ultra preset demands significantly more from the GPU.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear split in component responsibility depending on the resolution. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the dominant factor, as evidenced by the performance scaling across presets. The frame rate drops from 148.6 FPS at Low to 92.8 FPS at Ultra, a 55.8 FPS difference. This 37.6% reduction in performance when moving to the highest preset shows that the RTX 5080 is heavily taxed by the increased shading and texture work at 4K. The CPU’s role is less critical here, as even the most demanding preset still yields nearly double the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving down to 2560x1440, the GPU remains the primary bottleneck, but the margin widens. The spread between Low (276.5 FPS) and Ultra (163 FPS) is 113.5 FPS, showing that the GPU still scales significantly with preset changes. However, the absolute numbers are much higher, suggesting that the CPU is starting to play a more meaningful role in maintaining these elevated frame rates. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with its Zen 4 architecture, are sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s output at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the CPU’s importance grows relative to the GPU. The frame rates range from 400.3 FPS at Low to 257.3 FPS at Ultra, which are extreme values for any game. The fact that the Low preset reaches 400 FPS indicates that the RTX 5080 is not being fully utilized, as the CPU’s frame generation limit is being approached. This is a classic CPU-bound scenario at lower resolutions. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s single-thread performance, exemplified by its 3218 Cinebench R23 score, is what allows such high frame rates, but the data suggests that even this capable CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination ranks 164th out of 3712 tested combos for Doom. This places it in the top 4.4% of all configurations in the database, which is an exceptional result for a single game. The high ranking is driven by the GPU’s raw power, as the RTX 5080 sits in the 87th percentile for all GPUs, and the CPU’s solid performance, which is in the 77th percentile for all CPUs.

The combo’s rank is particularly impressive given that Doom is a fast-paced FPS that benefits from high frame rates. The data shows that this pairing is not just playable but highly optimized for the game, with the 4K Ultra average of 92.8 FPS being a standout figure. The combination outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database, making it a top-tier choice for this title. The rank also indicates that there is minimal bottlenecking between the two components, as both are contributing to the overall score rather than one holding the other back.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F are all within a 0.4% performance delta. The Intel Core i7-11850H has an average score of 24935, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen’s 24964. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, a 0.2% difference in its favor. The Intel Core i7-13620H scores 24911, and the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872, both slightly below the Ryzen. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Doom, as the differences are negligible for gaming workloads.

On the GPU side, the RTX 5080’s nearest rivals show a slightly wider range of results. The AMD Radeon 8060S is the closest, with an average score of 55757, just 0.6% below the RTX 5080’s 56083. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a 0.7% difference, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, a 2.3% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the only rival that outperforms the RTX 5080, scoring 57367, which is 2.2% higher. For Doom, a user with an RX 9070 GRE could expect slightly better frame rates, while those with any of the other rivals would see nearly identical performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at performance across all resolutions and presets. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 110.8 FPS on High, 148.6 FPS on Low, 132.2 FPS on Medium, and 92.8 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 55.8 FPS, which demonstrates the significant impact of graphical settings at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the numbers increase substantially. High settings average 202.3 FPS, Low settings average 276.5 FPS, Medium settings average 237.9 FPS, and Ultra settings average 163 FPS. This shows a 113.5 FPS difference between the lowest and highest presets, with all settings comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 1920x1080, the performance is extraordinary. High settings average 312.7 FPS, Low settings average 400.3 FPS, Medium settings average 368.5 FPS, and Ultra settings average 257.3 FPS. Even the most demanding preset at 1080p is more than four times the playability threshold, and the Low preset approaches 400 FPS, highlighting the system’s ability to drive high-refresh-rate displays.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that this PC can run Doom exceptionally well at all tested resolutions. At 3840x2160, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 92.8 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict for 4K is unambiguous: the system is fully capable of running the game at maximum settings with a comfortable margin.

At 2560x1440, the performance is even more impressive, with all presets averaging at least 163 FPS. This means the system can handle any settings configuration at 1440p without breaking a sweat, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are so high that the CPU becomes the limiting factor, but this is not a problem, as the lowest average is 257.3 FPS at Ultra. The verdict for 1080p is that the system is exceptionally well-suited for competitive play, where frame rates above 250 FPS are a significant advantage.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the best settings preset is Ultra, which achieves an average of 92.8 FPS. This is the most demanding preset that still maintains a frame rate above the 60 FPS playability threshold, making it the optimal choice for maximum visual quality at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the best settings preset is also Ultra, with an average of 163 FPS. This provides a perfect balance of high visual fidelity and smooth gameplay, with a frame rate that is more than double the playability threshold.

At 1920x1080, the best settings preset is Ultra, which averages 257.3 FPS. This is the highest preset available, and it still delivers a frame rate that is over four times the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring an incredibly smooth experience on any high-refresh-rate display.