Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Doom
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 51 | 63 | 74 | 85 |
| 1440p QHD | 95 | 116 | 137 | 157 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 179 | 211 | 243 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Doom on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a robust experience in Doom, with playable frame rates at every resolution tested. The data shows a clear scaling pattern where 1080p and 1440p resolutions allow for maximum settings, while 4K requires a slight compromise to stay above the 60 FPS threshold. This combination ranks in the 44th percentile of tested systems for this title, indicating a solid mid-pack performer.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional headroom across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 243 FPS, which represents the ceiling of the measured range. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 211 FPS, with a minimum of 180 FPS and a maximum of 243 FPS, showing the first measured variance window. The High preset averages 179 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra setting still maintains an average of 146 FPS. None of these numbers approach the playable threshold, making 1080p essentially effortless for this hardware.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but begins to show the expected resolution penalty. The Low preset averages 157 FPS, with Medium following at 137 FPS and a minimum of 116 FPS and maximum of 157 FPS. High settings produce a 116 FPS average, and Ultra maintains a 95 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 62 FPS, which indicates that the GPU scaling is consistent and predictable across the quality spectrum.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes noticeably. The Low preset averages 85 FPS, while Medium drops to 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS and maximum of 85 FPS. High settings average 63 FPS, which is just above the playable threshold. The Ultra preset falls to 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and represents the only non-playable configuration in the entire dataset. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a 34 FPS reduction, showing that the RTX 5060's 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth face their most significant challenge at this pixel count.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, delivering 146 FPS on average. This is the most demanding preset that remains well above the 60 FPS threshold, and the 146 FPS average leaves substantial margin for demanding scenes or background tasks.
For 2560x1440, Ultra is again the optimal choice, with an average of 95 FPS. This represents a 51 FPS drop compared to the 1080p Ultra result, but the performance remains smooth and consistent. The data indicates that this resolution/settings combination is the sweet spot for visual fidelity without sacrificing fluidity.
At 3840x2160, High settings are the best option that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging exactly 63 FPS. Medium also qualifies at 74 FPS, but the High preset offers better visual quality while still clearing the threshold. The Ultra preset at 51 FPS is the sole configuration that fails to meet the playable standard, so users targeting 4K should avoid it.
CPU and GPU Roles
The benchmark data reveals a clear GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions, with the CPU's influence diminishing as pixel count increases. At 1920x1080, the Ryzen 5 7400F's 6 cores and 12 threads with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz are sufficient to feed the RTX 5060, as evidenced by the 243 FPS Low preset result. The Zen 4 architecture's single-thread performance, reflected in a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, ensures that Doom's engine is not starved for instruction throughput at this resolution.
As resolution scales to 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. The 95 FPS Ultra result represents a 35% reduction from the 146 FPS 1080p Ultra score, which is consistent with the increased pixel workload rather than any CPU constraint. The RTX 5060's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 120 TMUs handle the geometry and texture work, while the CPU's role in frame pacing remains secondary.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck. The 51 FPS Ultra result versus the 146 FPS 1080p Ultra result demonstrates a 65% performance drop, which aligns with the 4x pixel count increase from 1080p to 4K. The CPU's contribution is effectively static across resolutions, as evidenced by the consistent scaling patterns — the delta between Low and Ultra at 4K is 34 FPS, nearly identical in proportion to the 97 FPS delta at 1080p. This indicates the Ryzen 5 7400F is never the limiting factor, even at the lowest resolution where CPU load would be highest relative to GPU load.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Ryzen 5 7400F's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks provide context for CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, a 0.1% delta from the 7400F's 32750 average, meaning these processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Doom at 1080p. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, a -0.2% delta, and would behave almost indistinguishably in CPU-limited sections. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0.2% delta) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% delta) round out the immediate competitive set, all within a 0.5% performance band.
On the GPU side, the RTX 5060's nearest rivals show interesting parity. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, a -0.3% delta from the 5060's 26331 average, suggesting virtually identical rasterization performance in Doom. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421 (-0.3% delta) and would produce nearly matching frame rates, though its older architecture may differ in driver overhead. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553, -0.8% delta) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (26011, 1.2% delta) represent the broader competitive envelope, with the RX 6750 XT being the closest alternative that slightly trails the 5060.
For users seeking similar overall system behavior, pairing the 7400F with any of these GPU alternatives would yield comparable FPS numbers, with differences under 2% in aggregate benchmark scores. The practical impact in Doom would be negligible at 1080p and 1440p, though the 4K Ultra preset might see minor variance given the RTX 5060's specific memory bandwidth characteristics.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Doom at 4K with maximum settings?
A: No. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages 51 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 63 FPS.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 95 FPS, making it the optimal choice. This is the most demanding preset that remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, with no minimum FPS recorded below 95.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to the RX 6750 XT in this system?
A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331, while the RX 6750 XT scores 26011, a 1.2% delta favoring the RTX 5060. In Doom, this translates to a marginal FPS advantage for the NVIDIA card across all resolutions.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F a bottleneck for the RTX 5060 at 1080p?
A: No. The 1080p Low preset achieves 243 FPS, and the Ultra preset maintains 146 FPS, indicating the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.70 GHz boost clock are sufficient. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs supports this conclusion.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 averages 211 FPS, with a minimum of 180 FPS and a maximum of 243 FPS. This provides a very smooth experience with headroom for variable scene complexity.
Q: Does this combo rank well among all tested systems for Doom?
A: The combination ranks 1640 out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle range. This position reflects its ability to play Doom at high frame rates across most resolutions, with only 4K Ultra falling below the playable threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination ranks 1640 out of 3712 tested combos for Doom, placing it in the 44th percentile of all systems evaluated. This mid-pack position is consistent with the hardware's individual standings — the CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile overall, while the GPU sits in the 72nd percentile. The discrepancy between component percentiles and the in-game rank suggests that Doom's engine is more sensitive to GPU throughput than CPU performance, which aligns with the measured FPS scaling patterns.
Compared to the full field of 3712 combos, this system outperforms 2072 configurations but trails 1639 others. The rank reflects a system that delivers high refresh rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and solid 4K performance with adjusted settings. The 51 FPS 4K Ultra result is the primary factor holding the rank back from a higher position, as the 146 FPS 1080p Ultra and 95 FPS 1440p Ultra results are competitive with many higher-tier configurations. For users prioritizing frame rate over resolution, this rank could be considered strong; for those seeking maxed-out 4K, the 1640th position highlights the GPU's limitation at the highest pixel counts.