Control

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a highly capable Control experience, but the data reveals a clear split between 1080p/1440p dominance and 4K limitations. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is strongly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s substantial headroom keeps frame rates consistent at lower settings. The following analysis breaks down exactly where this combo excels and where it falls short, using measured FPS data and comparative rankings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU and GPU in this combo each sit near distinct performance tiers, and the nearest rivals from the FACT PACK highlight how this pairing behaves. For the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, the average benchmark score is 93,785, placing it at the 96th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest competitor is the Intel Xeon 6520P, which scores 93,786 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two are effectively identical in overall processing power. Slightly behind are the AMD EPYC 4564P at 95,183 (deltaPct -1.5), the AMD EPYC 9175F at 95,615 (deltaPct -1.9), and the AMD EPYC 4565P at 95,764 (deltaPct -2.1). This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, a system with any of these EPYC processors would deliver nearly indistinguishable frame rates, though the Intel chip’s 24 cores and 24 threads with a 5.50 GHz boost clock give it a slight edge in single-threaded tasks that Control may utilize.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17,639 and ranks at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17,666 with a deltaPct of -0.2, placing it marginally ahead. The AMD Radeon 780M follows at 17,588 (deltaPct 0.3), meaning the RTX 4060 is only 0.3% faster than this integrated solution—an interesting data point for those considering lower-power alternatives. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551, deltaPct 0.5) and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17,509, deltaPct 0.7) are also within a fraction of a percent. For Control specifically, this means that swapping the RTX 4060 for any of these alternatives would produce very similar average FPS, though the RTX 4060’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and Ada Lovelace architecture may offer better driver-level optimization for the game’s physics-heavy rendering.

When combining these two components, the practical takeaway is that the CPU is overkill for this game at most settings, while the GPU is the limiting factor. Users upgrading from a slower CPU but keeping the RTX 4060 would see no meaningful FPS change in Control, as the data shows the GPU’s performance ceiling is reached well before the CPU’s capacity is taxed.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data across resolutions and presets makes it clear that the GPU dominates performance scaling in Control, while the CPU provides a stable foundation that never bottlenecks. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is substantial: 140 FPS at Low versus 77 FPS at Ultra, a drop of 63 FPS. This 45% reduction in frame rate is entirely attributable to the GPU’s workload increasing with graphical fidelity, as the CPU’s 24 threads are more than sufficient to feed the RTX 4060 at these frame rates. The same pattern holds at 2560x1440, where Low runs at 106 FPS and Ultra at 58 FPS, a 48 FPS gap. At 3840x2160, the spread narrows to 71 FPS at Low versus 39 FPS at Ultra, a 32 FPS difference, but the absolute numbers are much lower, indicating that the GPU is struggling with pixel throughput rather than any CPU limitation.

Resolution scaling further confirms this GPU-bound behavior. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings reduces average FPS from 88 to 67, a 23.9% drop. From 1440p to 2160p at High, the average falls from 67 to 45, a 32.8% drop. These percentages exceed what would be expected if the CPU were the bottleneck, as CPU-bound scenarios typically show minimal FPS changes with resolution. The fact that the Ultra preset at 1440p (58 FPS) is faster than the High preset at 2160p (45 FPS) reinforces that the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s and 8 GB VRAM are the constraining factors at higher resolutions. For users targeting 4K, the CPU’s role is negligible; the RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 performance simply cannot sustain 60 FPS at Ultra settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of this combo’s performance across three resolutions and four presets, with some entries including minimum and maximum frame rates for additional context. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 140 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and indicates a smooth experience even in intense combat scenarios. Medium settings average 99 FPS with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 114 FPS, showing that frame times are consistent with only a 30 FPS spread between the lowest and highest recorded values. High settings average 88 FPS, while Ultra averages 77 FPS—both comfortably above 60 FPS, though the lack of min/max data for these presets means the variance is unknown.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 106 FPS, still highly playable. Medium settings average 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 86 FPS; the 64 FPS minimum is just above the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting occasional dips during heavy effects but no sustained stutter. High settings average 67 FPS, which is playable but leaves less headroom, and Ultra drops to 58 FPS, falling below the playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. Low settings average 71 FPS, barely clearing 60 FPS. Medium settings average 51 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS—the 43 FPS minimum indicates significant frame drops during action sequences. High settings average 45 FPS, and Ultra averages 39 FPS, both unplayable for smooth gameplay. The min/max data for Medium at 2160p is particularly telling: a 15 FPS range between minimum and maximum shows that the GPU is struggling to maintain consistent frame pacing at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

In the broader database of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and RTX 4060 ranks 2008th out of 3720 total combos for Control, placing it in the 54th percentile. This rank reflects the GPU’s mid-tier standing (61st percentile among all GPUs) rather than the CPU’s top-tier position (96th percentile), confirming that the RTX 4060 is the determining factor for gameplay performance. The rank is relative to all tested combos, which include both weaker and stronger pairings; a combo with a faster GPU but a slower CPU would likely rank higher in this game, as the data shows no CPU bottleneck at any resolution or preset.

The 2008th rank out of 3720 means that roughly 54% of tested combos perform better and 46% perform worse. This places the combo in the upper-middle tier, which aligns with the measured FPS: it excels at 1080p, handles 1440p well at medium and high settings, but fails to reach 60 FPS at 4K for most presets. Users comparing this to other combos should note that the CPU’s high benchmark scores do not translate to a higher rank, as Control’s engine is primarily GPU-limited. The rank also underscores that while the CPU is future-proof for other titles, it does not boost this combo’s standing in this specific game.

The Verdict

The verdict by resolution is clear: this PC can run Control at 60 FPS or above at 1080p and 1440p, but only at 4K with the Low preset. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 77 FPS. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this combo, allowing users to max out settings without worrying about frame rate. At 2560x1440, the playable settings are High (67 FPS), Medium (75 FPS), and Low (106 FPS); Ultra falls to 58 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. For 1440p, High is the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 3840x2160, only the Low preset averages 71 FPS, clearing 60 FPS, while Medium (51 FPS), High (45 FPS), and Ultra (39 FPS) all fall short. Users with a 4K display should stick to Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a better experience.

The data also indicates that the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the primary limitations at 4K, as the 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for high-resolution textures. The CPU’s performance is never a concern; even at 1080p Low with 140 FPS, the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has ample headroom. For users prioritizing frame rate over visuals, this combo is a strong choice for 1080p and a competent one for 1440p, but it is not a 4K gaming solution beyond minimal settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Control at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?

A: Yes, but only at the Low preset, which averages 71 FPS. Medium averages 51 FPS, High averages 45 FPS, and Ultra averages 39 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gameplay?

A: The High preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, averaging 67 FPS. Medium averages 75 FPS, and Low averages 106 FPS, but Ultra falls to 58 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17,639, which is 0.2% slower than the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666) and 0.3% faster than the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588). The differences are negligible for gameplay.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Control at 1080p?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, frame rates drop from 140 FPS at Low to 77 FPS at Ultra, a 63 FPS difference that is entirely due to GPU workload. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking ensures it never bottlenecks.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values for Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080, the minimum is 84 FPS. At 2560x1440, the minimum is 64 FPS. At 3840x2160, the minimum is 43 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

Q: Does this combo rank high among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 2008th out of 3720 combos, placing it in the 54th percentile. The rank is driven by the GPU’s 61st percentile standing, not the CPU’s 96th percentile.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 77 FPS. This allows users to enable all visual features without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, the High preset average 67 FPS is the best choice, as it provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (75 FPS) while remaining above the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the Low preset average 71 FPS is the only playable option; Medium falls to 51 FPS, which is below the threshold. For users who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate, the Medium preset at 1440p or the Low preset at 4K are the recommended starting points, but the data shows that 1080p Ultra is the only configuration that fully exploits this combo’s potential.